横流中不同射流结构的性能比较

M. Lewandowski, Paul J. Kristo, Abdullah G. Weiss, M. Kimber
{"title":"横流中不同射流结构的性能比较","authors":"M. Lewandowski, Paul J. Kristo, Abdullah G. Weiss, M. Kimber","doi":"10.1115/icone2020-16655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, the well understood single round jet in crossflow is compared to an array of three jets aligned on the central axis of the crossflow, all of which are distinct with independent temperature and flow control. The benefit of this study is to better understand how an array of jets mix with a crossflow in turbulent conditions in an effort to further validate computation models for a variety of multiple-jet applications. The test section involves jets issuing vertically downward into a cross flow provided by a low speed wind tunnel. The jets are spaced two diameters apart, providing for an upstream, middle, and downstream jet. The hydraulic interactions are tracked via a stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (S-PIV) system. Several reference measurements and the uncertainty of the results are discussed to aid analogous computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models in the future. First order statistics between the single and triple jet cases with fixed flow rates are compared. Temporal analysis yields dominant frequencies at distinct regions within the flow. Insights into flow control of multiple jets in a cross flow is discussed. The experimental data sets compare the classical single jet in cross flow to the extension of multiple jets. Several differences in the flow behavior are found. The data sets serve as benchmark cases for future CFD models that will aim to replicate these flow types in different real-world applications such as coolant flows in a gas cooled reactor.","PeriodicalId":414088,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Student Paper Competition; Thermal-Hydraulics; Verification and Validation","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Behavior of Different Jet Configurations in a Crossflow\",\"authors\":\"M. Lewandowski, Paul J. Kristo, Abdullah G. Weiss, M. Kimber\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/icone2020-16655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this study, the well understood single round jet in crossflow is compared to an array of three jets aligned on the central axis of the crossflow, all of which are distinct with independent temperature and flow control. The benefit of this study is to better understand how an array of jets mix with a crossflow in turbulent conditions in an effort to further validate computation models for a variety of multiple-jet applications. The test section involves jets issuing vertically downward into a cross flow provided by a low speed wind tunnel. The jets are spaced two diameters apart, providing for an upstream, middle, and downstream jet. The hydraulic interactions are tracked via a stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (S-PIV) system. Several reference measurements and the uncertainty of the results are discussed to aid analogous computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models in the future. First order statistics between the single and triple jet cases with fixed flow rates are compared. Temporal analysis yields dominant frequencies at distinct regions within the flow. Insights into flow control of multiple jets in a cross flow is discussed. The experimental data sets compare the classical single jet in cross flow to the extension of multiple jets. Several differences in the flow behavior are found. The data sets serve as benchmark cases for future CFD models that will aim to replicate these flow types in different real-world applications such as coolant flows in a gas cooled reactor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 3: Student Paper Competition; Thermal-Hydraulics; Verification and Validation\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 3: Student Paper Competition; Thermal-Hydraulics; Verification and Validation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/icone2020-16655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Student Paper Competition; Thermal-Hydraulics; Verification and Validation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/icone2020-16655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本研究中,我们将横向流动中被充分理解的单个圆形射流与排列在横向流动中心轴上的三个射流阵列进行了比较,它们都是不同的,具有独立的温度和流动控制。这项研究的好处是更好地理解在湍流条件下射流阵列如何与横流混合,从而进一步验证各种多射流应用的计算模型。测试部分包括垂直向下喷射到低速风洞提供的横流中。射流间隔两个直径,提供上游、中部和下游射流。通过立体粒子图像测速(S-PIV)系统跟踪水力相互作用。讨论了几种参考测量和结果的不确定性,以帮助将来类似的计算流体动力学(CFD)模型。比较了固定流量下单射流和三射流的一阶统计量。时间分析在流的不同区域产生主导频率。讨论了交叉流中多射流的流动控制问题。实验数据集比较了经典的单喷流与多喷流的扩展。在流动特性上发现了一些差异。这些数据集可以作为未来CFD模型的基准案例,这些模型的目标是在不同的实际应用中复制这些流动类型,例如气冷反应堆中的冷却剂流动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Behavior of Different Jet Configurations in a Crossflow
In this study, the well understood single round jet in crossflow is compared to an array of three jets aligned on the central axis of the crossflow, all of which are distinct with independent temperature and flow control. The benefit of this study is to better understand how an array of jets mix with a crossflow in turbulent conditions in an effort to further validate computation models for a variety of multiple-jet applications. The test section involves jets issuing vertically downward into a cross flow provided by a low speed wind tunnel. The jets are spaced two diameters apart, providing for an upstream, middle, and downstream jet. The hydraulic interactions are tracked via a stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (S-PIV) system. Several reference measurements and the uncertainty of the results are discussed to aid analogous computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models in the future. First order statistics between the single and triple jet cases with fixed flow rates are compared. Temporal analysis yields dominant frequencies at distinct regions within the flow. Insights into flow control of multiple jets in a cross flow is discussed. The experimental data sets compare the classical single jet in cross flow to the extension of multiple jets. Several differences in the flow behavior are found. The data sets serve as benchmark cases for future CFD models that will aim to replicate these flow types in different real-world applications such as coolant flows in a gas cooled reactor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信