限制性输血对全髋关节置换术后急性肾损伤的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验

H. Son, Y. Choi, Ji Yoon Lee, Y. Ro
{"title":"限制性输血对全髋关节置换术后急性肾损伤的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验","authors":"H. Son, Y. Choi, Ji Yoon Lee, Y. Ro","doi":"10.30579/mbse.2020.3.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corresponding author Hyo Jung Son Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Police Hospital, Songee-ro 123, Songpagu, Seoul 05715, Korea Tel: +82-2-3400-1492 Fax: +82-2-3400-1249 E-mail: gidget80@police.go.kr ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7710-7605 Blood transfusion is an important method of fluid management and benefits patients when properly used; however, it involves the risk of side effects such as critical organ damage. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a restrictive transfusion strategy (transfusion threshold of hemoglobin 8 g/dL) compared to a conventional transfusion strategy (transfusion threshold of hemoglobin 10 g/dL) on postoperative AKI among patients undergoing total hip replacement arthroplasty (THRA). Patients undergoing THRA were divided into two groups: restrictive transfusion strategy (n=72) and conventional transfusion strategy (n=72). Stroke volume variation was performed to maintain methods, complications, and preoperative and postoperative laboratory tests. They were categorized according to changes in plasma creatinine (Cr) concentration within 48 hours after THRA using Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred in three patients (4.2%) in the restrictive transfusion strategy group and two patients (2.8%) in the conventional transfusion strategy group (p=0.99). The mean serum Cr levels 48 hours after surgery were 0.76±0.36 and 0.66±0.20 mg/dL in the restrictive transfusion strategy group and the conventional transfusion strategy group, respectively (p=0.30). Perioperative restrictive transfusion or conventional transfusion in patients undergoing elective THRA is not related to AKI when maintaining proper volume status during surgery.","PeriodicalId":259565,"journal":{"name":"Medical Biological Science and Engineering","volume":"497 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of restrictive blood transfusion on postoperative acute kidney injury after total hip replacement arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"H. Son, Y. Choi, Ji Yoon Lee, Y. Ro\",\"doi\":\"10.30579/mbse.2020.3.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Corresponding author Hyo Jung Son Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Police Hospital, Songee-ro 123, Songpagu, Seoul 05715, Korea Tel: +82-2-3400-1492 Fax: +82-2-3400-1249 E-mail: gidget80@police.go.kr ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7710-7605 Blood transfusion is an important method of fluid management and benefits patients when properly used; however, it involves the risk of side effects such as critical organ damage. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a restrictive transfusion strategy (transfusion threshold of hemoglobin 8 g/dL) compared to a conventional transfusion strategy (transfusion threshold of hemoglobin 10 g/dL) on postoperative AKI among patients undergoing total hip replacement arthroplasty (THRA). Patients undergoing THRA were divided into two groups: restrictive transfusion strategy (n=72) and conventional transfusion strategy (n=72). Stroke volume variation was performed to maintain methods, complications, and preoperative and postoperative laboratory tests. They were categorized according to changes in plasma creatinine (Cr) concentration within 48 hours after THRA using Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred in three patients (4.2%) in the restrictive transfusion strategy group and two patients (2.8%) in the conventional transfusion strategy group (p=0.99). The mean serum Cr levels 48 hours after surgery were 0.76±0.36 and 0.66±0.20 mg/dL in the restrictive transfusion strategy group and the conventional transfusion strategy group, respectively (p=0.30). Perioperative restrictive transfusion or conventional transfusion in patients undergoing elective THRA is not related to AKI when maintaining proper volume status during surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Biological Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"497 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Biological Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30579/mbse.2020.3.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Biological Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30579/mbse.2020.3.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通讯作者Hyo Jung Son韩国首尔松坡区松基路123国立警察医院麻醉与疼痛科电话:+82-2-3400-1492传真:+82-2-3400-1249 E-mail: gidget80@police.go.kr ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7710-7605输血是一种重要的液体管理方法,正确使用对患者有益;然而,它有副作用的风险,比如严重的器官损伤。本研究旨在评估限制性输血策略(血红蛋白8 g/dL输血阈值)与常规输血策略(血红蛋白10 g/dL输血阈值)对全髋关节置换术(THRA)患者术后AKI的疗效和安全性。接受THRA的患者分为两组:限制性输血组(n=72)和常规输血组(n=72)。通过脑卒中容量变化来维持方法、并发症以及术前和术后的实验室检查。根据急性肾损伤网络标准,根据THRA后48小时内血浆肌酐(Cr)浓度的变化进行分类。限制性输血组3例(4.2%)发生急性肾损伤,常规输血组2例(2.8%)发生急性肾损伤(p=0.99)。限制性输血组和常规输血组术后48 h血清Cr平均值分别为0.76±0.36、0.66±0.20 mg/dL (p=0.30)。择期THRA患者围术期限制性输血或常规输血与AKI无关,术中保持适当的容积状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of restrictive blood transfusion on postoperative acute kidney injury after total hip replacement arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Corresponding author Hyo Jung Son Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Police Hospital, Songee-ro 123, Songpagu, Seoul 05715, Korea Tel: +82-2-3400-1492 Fax: +82-2-3400-1249 E-mail: gidget80@police.go.kr ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7710-7605 Blood transfusion is an important method of fluid management and benefits patients when properly used; however, it involves the risk of side effects such as critical organ damage. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a restrictive transfusion strategy (transfusion threshold of hemoglobin 8 g/dL) compared to a conventional transfusion strategy (transfusion threshold of hemoglobin 10 g/dL) on postoperative AKI among patients undergoing total hip replacement arthroplasty (THRA). Patients undergoing THRA were divided into two groups: restrictive transfusion strategy (n=72) and conventional transfusion strategy (n=72). Stroke volume variation was performed to maintain methods, complications, and preoperative and postoperative laboratory tests. They were categorized according to changes in plasma creatinine (Cr) concentration within 48 hours after THRA using Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred in three patients (4.2%) in the restrictive transfusion strategy group and two patients (2.8%) in the conventional transfusion strategy group (p=0.99). The mean serum Cr levels 48 hours after surgery were 0.76±0.36 and 0.66±0.20 mg/dL in the restrictive transfusion strategy group and the conventional transfusion strategy group, respectively (p=0.30). Perioperative restrictive transfusion or conventional transfusion in patients undergoing elective THRA is not related to AKI when maintaining proper volume status during surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信