瑞典硬化还是假性硬化?20世纪80年代的瑞典

A. Offer, Gabriel Söderberg
{"title":"瑞典硬化还是假性硬化?20世纪80年代的瑞典","authors":"A. Offer, Gabriel Söderberg","doi":"10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691196312.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers the state of Swedish economics in the 1980s. Between 1976 and 1982, Sweden suffered a sequence of economic buffetings. Government expenditure rose to more than 60 percent of GDP, and public employment embraced one-third of the workforce. In response, business flung itself into massive protest, setting up think tanks which published massively, agitating in parliament, the press, and even in the streets. The discipline of economics mobilized too. Assar Lindbeck cranked up criticism of his old party, and finally resigned from it in 1982 over the wage-fund issue, a few weeks before the election. But in defiance of his forebodings, the eight years of Social Democratic government after 1982 were economically more successful than the previous six under centre-right (‘bourgeois’) governments: inflation fell most of the time, output increased, and unemployment stayed low.","PeriodicalId":189824,"journal":{"name":"The Nobel Factor","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Swedosclerosis or Pseudosclerosis? Sweden in the 1980s\",\"authors\":\"A. Offer, Gabriel Söderberg\",\"doi\":\"10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691196312.003.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter considers the state of Swedish economics in the 1980s. Between 1976 and 1982, Sweden suffered a sequence of economic buffetings. Government expenditure rose to more than 60 percent of GDP, and public employment embraced one-third of the workforce. In response, business flung itself into massive protest, setting up think tanks which published massively, agitating in parliament, the press, and even in the streets. The discipline of economics mobilized too. Assar Lindbeck cranked up criticism of his old party, and finally resigned from it in 1982 over the wage-fund issue, a few weeks before the election. But in defiance of his forebodings, the eight years of Social Democratic government after 1982 were economically more successful than the previous six under centre-right (‘bourgeois’) governments: inflation fell most of the time, output increased, and unemployment stayed low.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Nobel Factor\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Nobel Factor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691196312.003.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nobel Factor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691196312.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章考察了20世纪80年代瑞典经济的状况。1976年至1982年间,瑞典遭受了一系列经济冲击。政府支出占国内生产总值的比重上升到60%以上,公共就业占劳动力的三分之一。作为回应,商界投身到大规模的抗议活动中,成立了大量发表文章的智库,在议会、新闻界甚至街头进行鼓动。经济学学科也动员起来了。阿萨尔·林德贝克(Assar Lindbeck)加大了对他的旧政党的批评,并最终在1982年大选前几周因工资基金问题退出该党。但与他的预言相反,1982年之后的8年社会民主党政府在经济上比中右翼(“资产阶级”)政府领导下的前6年更成功:通货膨胀在大部分时间里下降,产出增加,失业率保持在低水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Swedosclerosis or Pseudosclerosis? Sweden in the 1980s
This chapter considers the state of Swedish economics in the 1980s. Between 1976 and 1982, Sweden suffered a sequence of economic buffetings. Government expenditure rose to more than 60 percent of GDP, and public employment embraced one-third of the workforce. In response, business flung itself into massive protest, setting up think tanks which published massively, agitating in parliament, the press, and even in the streets. The discipline of economics mobilized too. Assar Lindbeck cranked up criticism of his old party, and finally resigned from it in 1982 over the wage-fund issue, a few weeks before the election. But in defiance of his forebodings, the eight years of Social Democratic government after 1982 were economically more successful than the previous six under centre-right (‘bourgeois’) governments: inflation fell most of the time, output increased, and unemployment stayed low.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信