2019年出版的《日本商业史精选》书评

Kazuo Hori, M. Hagiwara
{"title":"2019年出版的《日本商业史精选》书评","authors":"Kazuo Hori, M. Hagiwara","doi":"10.5029/jrbh.37.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"East Asia has made a remarkable economic development during the twentieth century. The aim of this book is to highlight a unique characteristic of this economic development and point out its challenge to the present world. Many studies on East Asia’s economic development presupposed the development model based on historical experiences in Europe and the United States. They understood the development of developing economies in East Asia as a process to catch up with developed economies in Europe and the United States. However, by conducting a long-term investigation covering a century-long period since the late nineteenth century, this book demonstrates that development patterns of East Asian economies are different from those of Western countries. In addition, by applying the same analytical framework to both Japanese and Chinese economies, which have hitherto been only contrasted with each other, it reveals that economies in the East Asian region consisting of China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan have developed, showing both similarities and differences. This challenging subject of theorizing development patterns of East Asian economies differing from those of Western countries is very intriguing. It is particularly worth noting that this book shows the following similarities and differences in the development of East Asian economies. With regard to similarities, first, a continuous economic development was realized intrinsically through the expansion of the domestic market. Second, the East Asian economies developed not as a closed chain within the East Asian region but as part of the global economy. As for a difference, the processes of economic development were different between Japan and China, because modern industries emerged at different periods. More concretely, in Japan, in which modern industries had emerged during the 1880s and 1890s, heavy and chemical industries developed during the interwar period, contributing to the advancement and sophistication of industries. Whereas, in China, in which modern industries emerged during the 1910s and 1920s, the secondary sector of industry consisted mostly of light industries, and the development of heavy industries was only limited. Despite these interesting findings, however, consumer goods industries such as the apparel and auto industries should have been included in the investigation in addition to core manufacturing industries dealt with in this book for the purpose of a better understanding of the economic development of East Asia, which has now become the “world’s factory.”","PeriodicalId":199811,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Research in Business History","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Selected Books on Japanese Business History Published in 2019\",\"authors\":\"Kazuo Hori, M. Hagiwara\",\"doi\":\"10.5029/jrbh.37.84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"East Asia has made a remarkable economic development during the twentieth century. The aim of this book is to highlight a unique characteristic of this economic development and point out its challenge to the present world. Many studies on East Asia’s economic development presupposed the development model based on historical experiences in Europe and the United States. They understood the development of developing economies in East Asia as a process to catch up with developed economies in Europe and the United States. However, by conducting a long-term investigation covering a century-long period since the late nineteenth century, this book demonstrates that development patterns of East Asian economies are different from those of Western countries. In addition, by applying the same analytical framework to both Japanese and Chinese economies, which have hitherto been only contrasted with each other, it reveals that economies in the East Asian region consisting of China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan have developed, showing both similarities and differences. This challenging subject of theorizing development patterns of East Asian economies differing from those of Western countries is very intriguing. It is particularly worth noting that this book shows the following similarities and differences in the development of East Asian economies. With regard to similarities, first, a continuous economic development was realized intrinsically through the expansion of the domestic market. Second, the East Asian economies developed not as a closed chain within the East Asian region but as part of the global economy. As for a difference, the processes of economic development were different between Japan and China, because modern industries emerged at different periods. More concretely, in Japan, in which modern industries had emerged during the 1880s and 1890s, heavy and chemical industries developed during the interwar period, contributing to the advancement and sophistication of industries. Whereas, in China, in which modern industries emerged during the 1910s and 1920s, the secondary sector of industry consisted mostly of light industries, and the development of heavy industries was only limited. Despite these interesting findings, however, consumer goods industries such as the apparel and auto industries should have been included in the investigation in addition to core manufacturing industries dealt with in this book for the purpose of a better understanding of the economic development of East Asia, which has now become the “world’s factory.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":199811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Research in Business History\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Research in Business History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5029/jrbh.37.84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Research in Business History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5029/jrbh.37.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

东亚在二十世纪取得了令人瞩目的经济发展。这本书的目的是强调这种经济发展的一个独特特征,并指出它对当今世界的挑战。许多关于东亚经济发展的研究都基于欧美的历史经验预设了这种发展模式。他们把东亚发展中经济体的发展理解为追赶欧美发达经济体的过程。然而,通过对19世纪末以来长达一个世纪的长期调查,这本书证明了东亚经济体的发展模式与西方国家不同。此外,通过将相同的分析框架应用于日本和中国经济,揭示了东亚地区由中国、日本、韩国和台湾组成的经济已经发展,既有相似之处,也有差异。将东亚经济体不同于西方国家的发展模式理论化这一具有挑战性的课题非常耐人寻味。特别值得注意的是,本书展示了东亚经济体发展的以下异同点。就相似之处而言,首先,经济的持续发展本质上是通过扩大国内市场来实现的。第二,东亚经济的发展不是东亚区域内的封闭链条,而是作为全球经济的一部分。至于差异,日本和中国的经济发展过程是不同的,因为现代工业出现的时期不同。更具体地说,在日本,现代工业在19世纪80年代和90年代出现,重工业和化学工业在两次世界大战之间发展起来,促进了工业的进步和复杂化。而在20世纪10年代和20年代出现现代工业的中国,第二产业主要是轻工业,重工业的发展十分有限。然而,尽管有这些有趣的发现,为了更好地了解已经成为“世界工厂”的东亚的经济发展,除了本书所涉及的核心制造业之外,还应该将服装和汽车等消费品行业纳入调查范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of Selected Books on Japanese Business History Published in 2019
East Asia has made a remarkable economic development during the twentieth century. The aim of this book is to highlight a unique characteristic of this economic development and point out its challenge to the present world. Many studies on East Asia’s economic development presupposed the development model based on historical experiences in Europe and the United States. They understood the development of developing economies in East Asia as a process to catch up with developed economies in Europe and the United States. However, by conducting a long-term investigation covering a century-long period since the late nineteenth century, this book demonstrates that development patterns of East Asian economies are different from those of Western countries. In addition, by applying the same analytical framework to both Japanese and Chinese economies, which have hitherto been only contrasted with each other, it reveals that economies in the East Asian region consisting of China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan have developed, showing both similarities and differences. This challenging subject of theorizing development patterns of East Asian economies differing from those of Western countries is very intriguing. It is particularly worth noting that this book shows the following similarities and differences in the development of East Asian economies. With regard to similarities, first, a continuous economic development was realized intrinsically through the expansion of the domestic market. Second, the East Asian economies developed not as a closed chain within the East Asian region but as part of the global economy. As for a difference, the processes of economic development were different between Japan and China, because modern industries emerged at different periods. More concretely, in Japan, in which modern industries had emerged during the 1880s and 1890s, heavy and chemical industries developed during the interwar period, contributing to the advancement and sophistication of industries. Whereas, in China, in which modern industries emerged during the 1910s and 1920s, the secondary sector of industry consisted mostly of light industries, and the development of heavy industries was only limited. Despite these interesting findings, however, consumer goods industries such as the apparel and auto industries should have been included in the investigation in addition to core manufacturing industries dealt with in this book for the purpose of a better understanding of the economic development of East Asia, which has now become the “world’s factory.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信