A. Olson, Nadine Hartmann, R. Schlenker‐Herceg, L. Wallace
{"title":"进行性纤维化间质性肺病的患病率","authors":"A. Olson, Nadine Hartmann, R. Schlenker‐Herceg, L. Wallace","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is an important group of patients with a progressive fibrosing form of interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) (Flaherty, K.R. et al. BMJ Open Respir Res 2017;4:e000212) who do not meet idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) diagnostic criteria but have a similar natural history and prognosis. Compared to IPF, the relative prevalence of PF-ILD is unknown. Aims and objectives: To estimate the prevalence of PF-ILD in Europe and the USA. Methods: Systematic literature review in Medline and Embase (1990–2017) focused on the prevalence of ILD and the forms of ILD known to be at risk for a progressive fibrosing phenotype. Supplemented by data from physician surveys and interviews, prevalence estimates were generated for each subtype and then combined to estimate overall PF-ILD prevalence. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the upper bounds of the estimate. Results: The overall prevalence of ILD (per 10,000 persons) was reported as 0.63–7.6 in 4 studies in Europe and 7.43 in the USA. Prevalence estimates for individual progressive fibrosing ILDs and PF-ILD overall are presented in the Table. PF-ILD prevalence (per 10,000 persons) ranged from 0.22–2.0 in Europe and was 2.80 in the USA. Conclusions: PF-ILD affects fewer than 5 in 10,000 persons in Europe and the USA, a patient population with an unmet need for treatment. Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim. Editorial assistance: Complete HealthVizion.","PeriodicalId":267660,"journal":{"name":"Rare ILD/DPLD","volume":"302 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease\",\"authors\":\"A. Olson, Nadine Hartmann, R. Schlenker‐Herceg, L. Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There is an important group of patients with a progressive fibrosing form of interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) (Flaherty, K.R. et al. BMJ Open Respir Res 2017;4:e000212) who do not meet idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) diagnostic criteria but have a similar natural history and prognosis. Compared to IPF, the relative prevalence of PF-ILD is unknown. Aims and objectives: To estimate the prevalence of PF-ILD in Europe and the USA. Methods: Systematic literature review in Medline and Embase (1990–2017) focused on the prevalence of ILD and the forms of ILD known to be at risk for a progressive fibrosing phenotype. Supplemented by data from physician surveys and interviews, prevalence estimates were generated for each subtype and then combined to estimate overall PF-ILD prevalence. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the upper bounds of the estimate. Results: The overall prevalence of ILD (per 10,000 persons) was reported as 0.63–7.6 in 4 studies in Europe and 7.43 in the USA. Prevalence estimates for individual progressive fibrosing ILDs and PF-ILD overall are presented in the Table. PF-ILD prevalence (per 10,000 persons) ranged from 0.22–2.0 in Europe and was 2.80 in the USA. Conclusions: PF-ILD affects fewer than 5 in 10,000 persons in Europe and the USA, a patient population with an unmet need for treatment. Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim. Editorial assistance: Complete HealthVizion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rare ILD/DPLD\",\"volume\":\"302 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rare ILD/DPLD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rare ILD/DPLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevalence of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease
Background: There is an important group of patients with a progressive fibrosing form of interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) (Flaherty, K.R. et al. BMJ Open Respir Res 2017;4:e000212) who do not meet idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) diagnostic criteria but have a similar natural history and prognosis. Compared to IPF, the relative prevalence of PF-ILD is unknown. Aims and objectives: To estimate the prevalence of PF-ILD in Europe and the USA. Methods: Systematic literature review in Medline and Embase (1990–2017) focused on the prevalence of ILD and the forms of ILD known to be at risk for a progressive fibrosing phenotype. Supplemented by data from physician surveys and interviews, prevalence estimates were generated for each subtype and then combined to estimate overall PF-ILD prevalence. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the upper bounds of the estimate. Results: The overall prevalence of ILD (per 10,000 persons) was reported as 0.63–7.6 in 4 studies in Europe and 7.43 in the USA. Prevalence estimates for individual progressive fibrosing ILDs and PF-ILD overall are presented in the Table. PF-ILD prevalence (per 10,000 persons) ranged from 0.22–2.0 in Europe and was 2.80 in the USA. Conclusions: PF-ILD affects fewer than 5 in 10,000 persons in Europe and the USA, a patient population with an unmet need for treatment. Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim. Editorial assistance: Complete HealthVizion.