核心家庭与后现代理论

T. Noble
{"title":"核心家庭与后现代理论","authors":"T. Noble","doi":"10.15057/8363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper addresses the question of whether postmodernist theory of the family reflects the emergence of a crisis for the family itself or a crisis in theoretical discourse about it. While family life is undergoing widespread change, this is not a recent phenomenon. If it is claimed that the family has changed to such a degree that it no longer corresponds to what has been identified as the modern form, the argument that it has moved into a postmodern phase should be related to the extent that modernisation has been achieved in the wider society. Material from three contrasted societies, Great Britain, Korea and Guyana, suggests there is no universal and systematic relationship between family change and the degree of modernisation. The characterisation of family life in the late twentieth century as postmodern reflects rather the problem theorists have in presenting an account of continuing change affecting an unstable and cyclical set of relationships. Postmodernism is essentially an issue in the sociology of knowledge rather than a matter of a radical discontinuity in social process. The readiness of postmodernist theory to abandon binary oppositions or over rationalised theorisations generally however is a possibly hopeful development in furthering our understanding of change.","PeriodicalId":335834,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of social studies","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Nuclear Family and Postmodern Theory\",\"authors\":\"T. Noble\",\"doi\":\"10.15057/8363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper addresses the question of whether postmodernist theory of the family reflects the emergence of a crisis for the family itself or a crisis in theoretical discourse about it. While family life is undergoing widespread change, this is not a recent phenomenon. If it is claimed that the family has changed to such a degree that it no longer corresponds to what has been identified as the modern form, the argument that it has moved into a postmodern phase should be related to the extent that modernisation has been achieved in the wider society. Material from three contrasted societies, Great Britain, Korea and Guyana, suggests there is no universal and systematic relationship between family change and the degree of modernisation. The characterisation of family life in the late twentieth century as postmodern reflects rather the problem theorists have in presenting an account of continuing change affecting an unstable and cyclical set of relationships. Postmodernism is essentially an issue in the sociology of knowledge rather than a matter of a radical discontinuity in social process. The readiness of postmodernist theory to abandon binary oppositions or over rationalised theorisations generally however is a possibly hopeful development in furthering our understanding of change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of social studies\",\"volume\":\"159 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of social studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15057/8363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of social studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/8363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文探讨的问题是,后现代主义家庭理论是否反映了家庭本身危机的出现,还是反映了家庭理论话语中的危机。虽然家庭生活正在发生广泛的变化,但这并不是最近才出现的现象。如果有人声称家庭已经改变到不再符合现代形式的程度,那么家庭已经进入后现代阶段的论点应该与现代化在更广泛的社会中实现的程度有关。来自英国、韩国和圭亚那这三个截然不同的社会的材料表明,家庭变化与现代化程度之间没有普遍和系统的关系。将二十世纪后期的家庭生活描述为后现代,反映了理论家在呈现影响不稳定和周期性关系的持续变化的描述时所遇到的问题。后现代主义本质上是一个知识社会学的问题,而不是社会过程的根本中断问题。然而,后现代主义理论准备放弃二元对立或过度合理化的理论,在促进我们对变化的理解方面可能是一个有希望的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Nuclear Family and Postmodern Theory
The paper addresses the question of whether postmodernist theory of the family reflects the emergence of a crisis for the family itself or a crisis in theoretical discourse about it. While family life is undergoing widespread change, this is not a recent phenomenon. If it is claimed that the family has changed to such a degree that it no longer corresponds to what has been identified as the modern form, the argument that it has moved into a postmodern phase should be related to the extent that modernisation has been achieved in the wider society. Material from three contrasted societies, Great Britain, Korea and Guyana, suggests there is no universal and systematic relationship between family change and the degree of modernisation. The characterisation of family life in the late twentieth century as postmodern reflects rather the problem theorists have in presenting an account of continuing change affecting an unstable and cyclical set of relationships. Postmodernism is essentially an issue in the sociology of knowledge rather than a matter of a radical discontinuity in social process. The readiness of postmodernist theory to abandon binary oppositions or over rationalised theorisations generally however is a possibly hopeful development in furthering our understanding of change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信