通过整合地震层位井联顶解释和方位电阻率工具的地质导向距离到地层边界计算,最大限度地减少储层顶部结构的不确定性:泰国海上案例研究

Numan Phettongkam, H. Ngo, A. Ruangsirikulchai, Ngamwilai Somwangsombat, Rutchanok Nasomsong, Saris Visessumon, Kampanart Jankham, P. Loviruchsutee, N. Gongsakdi, P. Chommali, Viktor Dovgopolyy, Jesús Rodríguez, Anis Sitthivanich
{"title":"通过整合地震层位井联顶解释和方位电阻率工具的地质导向距离到地层边界计算,最大限度地减少储层顶部结构的不确定性:泰国海上案例研究","authors":"Numan Phettongkam, H. Ngo, A. Ruangsirikulchai, Ngamwilai Somwangsombat, Rutchanok Nasomsong, Saris Visessumon, Kampanart Jankham, P. Loviruchsutee, N. Gongsakdi, P. Chommali, Viktor Dovgopolyy, Jesús Rodríguez, Anis Sitthivanich","doi":"10.2523/iptc-23018-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reservoir top structure interpretation through seismic usually associated with uncertainty especially when sparse number of wells are available. This leads to uncertainty in gross rock volume and oil-in-place calculation. It is quite common with reservoir top interpretation picking varies significantly from optimistic to pessimistic case especially at the point distant away from wellbore.\n This paper integrates the geosteering distance-to-boundary (DTB) calculation from horizontal well drilling to minimize the uncertainty window of top interpretation from surface seismic to deliver more accurate remaining oil-in place.\n During the geosteering operation, seismic horizon interpretation of reservoir target sand with multiple scenarios in offshore field was compared with the distance to boundary calculation that map the reservoir top structure with azimuthal resistivity tool. Prior to geosteer horizontal well in the oil-rim reservoir after long production, pilot hole was drilled to update the current fluid contact. Reservoir top interpretation is revised by including horizon top structure tied to well data from the pilot hole and existing wells in the area.\n The revised top structure which includes the pessimistic and optimistic case generally has significant difference in remaining OIP. Upon geosteering horizontal well, DTB calculation from azimuthal resistivity tool was capable to map the top reservoir boundary in real-time with reference from the seismic top interpretation from heel to toe of the lateral with good quality mapping of entire top reservoir structure.\n Distance to boundary (DTB) with good quality of top reservoir structure mapping throughout the section tracked closely to optimistic case of seismic top interpretation of target sand. Geosteering with azimuthal resistivity with RSS directional tool mapped the top of the reservoir on the upside and OWC from the downside up to 4.8 m away from the tool. As the top is expected to dip down and intersected the trajectory at multiple scenarios, the mapped boundary provided insights of gentle dipping trend, suggesting the top of reservoir could extend laterally longer than pessimistic case. With the result closer to optimistic case, the calculated remaining OIP volume calculated was on the optimistic side with significant difference, larger volume, from pessimistic case of OIP calculation.\n Integration of seismic top interpretation with geosteering distance to boundary application in lateral well could minimize the uncertainty in reservoir top horizon interpretation. The workflow enabled to place the well in the sweet spot while managing the uncertainty of top structure. With production from horizontal well, the well production rate is expected to increase to 2900 BOPD for initial oil production compare to below 1000 BOPD prior to horizontal well drilling. This workflow could be applied for future lateral well with high uncertainty of the target to place the well in sweetspot for field life extension and production optimization.","PeriodicalId":185347,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimising Reservoir Top Structure Uncertainty through Integration of Seismic Horizon Well-Tied Top Interpretation and Geosteering Distance-to-Bed-Boundary Calculation from Azimuthal Resistivity Tool: Case Study from Offshore Thailand\",\"authors\":\"Numan Phettongkam, H. Ngo, A. Ruangsirikulchai, Ngamwilai Somwangsombat, Rutchanok Nasomsong, Saris Visessumon, Kampanart Jankham, P. Loviruchsutee, N. Gongsakdi, P. Chommali, Viktor Dovgopolyy, Jesús Rodríguez, Anis Sitthivanich\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-23018-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Reservoir top structure interpretation through seismic usually associated with uncertainty especially when sparse number of wells are available. This leads to uncertainty in gross rock volume and oil-in-place calculation. It is quite common with reservoir top interpretation picking varies significantly from optimistic to pessimistic case especially at the point distant away from wellbore.\\n This paper integrates the geosteering distance-to-boundary (DTB) calculation from horizontal well drilling to minimize the uncertainty window of top interpretation from surface seismic to deliver more accurate remaining oil-in place.\\n During the geosteering operation, seismic horizon interpretation of reservoir target sand with multiple scenarios in offshore field was compared with the distance to boundary calculation that map the reservoir top structure with azimuthal resistivity tool. Prior to geosteer horizontal well in the oil-rim reservoir after long production, pilot hole was drilled to update the current fluid contact. Reservoir top interpretation is revised by including horizon top structure tied to well data from the pilot hole and existing wells in the area.\\n The revised top structure which includes the pessimistic and optimistic case generally has significant difference in remaining OIP. Upon geosteering horizontal well, DTB calculation from azimuthal resistivity tool was capable to map the top reservoir boundary in real-time with reference from the seismic top interpretation from heel to toe of the lateral with good quality mapping of entire top reservoir structure.\\n Distance to boundary (DTB) with good quality of top reservoir structure mapping throughout the section tracked closely to optimistic case of seismic top interpretation of target sand. Geosteering with azimuthal resistivity with RSS directional tool mapped the top of the reservoir on the upside and OWC from the downside up to 4.8 m away from the tool. As the top is expected to dip down and intersected the trajectory at multiple scenarios, the mapped boundary provided insights of gentle dipping trend, suggesting the top of reservoir could extend laterally longer than pessimistic case. With the result closer to optimistic case, the calculated remaining OIP volume calculated was on the optimistic side with significant difference, larger volume, from pessimistic case of OIP calculation.\\n Integration of seismic top interpretation with geosteering distance to boundary application in lateral well could minimize the uncertainty in reservoir top horizon interpretation. The workflow enabled to place the well in the sweet spot while managing the uncertainty of top structure. With production from horizontal well, the well production rate is expected to increase to 2900 BOPD for initial oil production compare to below 1000 BOPD prior to horizontal well drilling. This workflow could be applied for future lateral well with high uncertainty of the target to place the well in sweetspot for field life extension and production optimization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23018-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23018-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过地震解释油藏顶部结构通常具有不确定性,特别是在井数稀少的情况下。这导致了总岩石体积和含油量计算的不确定性。通常情况下,油藏顶部解释选择在乐观和悲观的情况下差异很大,特别是在远离井筒的地方。本文集成了水平井钻井的地质导向距边界(DTB)计算,以最大限度地减少地面地震顶部解释的不确定性窗口,从而提供更准确的剩余油。在地质导向作业中,将海上油田多种场景下储层目标砂的地震层位解释与利用方位角电阻率工具绘制储层顶部构造的距离边界计算进行了对比。在长时间生产后的油环油藏中,在进行地质导向水平井之前,需要钻导孔以更新当前的流体接触。通过将层顶结构与该地区的先导井和现有井的井数据相结合,对储层顶部解释进行了修正。修订后的顶层结构包括悲观和乐观情况,在剩余的伊办中一般有显著差异。在地质导向水平井上,利用方位角电阻率工具计算的DTB,可以参考地震顶解释,从侧向井跟到井底,实时绘制顶储层边界图,对整个顶储层构造进行了高质量的绘制。整个剖面的顶部储层构造填图质量良好,与目标砂层地震顶部解释的乐观情况密切相关。利用方位电阻率和RSS定向工具进行地质导向,绘制了上部的油藏顶部和下部距离工具4.8 m的OWC。由于在多种情况下,储层顶部预计会向下倾斜并与轨迹相交,因此绘制的边界提供了平缓倾斜趋势的信息,表明储层顶部横向延伸的时间可能比悲观情况更长。结果更接近于乐观情况,计算出的剩余OIP体积与OIP计算的悲观情况有显著差异,体积更大。将地震顶层解释与地质导向距离相结合,应用于水平井中,可以最大限度地减少储层顶层位解释的不确定性。该工作流程能够在控制顶部结构不确定性的同时,将井置于最佳位置。水平井生产后,初期产油量预计将增加到2900桶/天,而水平井之前的产油量不到1000桶/天。该工作流程可应用于目标高度不确定的横向井,将井置于甜点位置,以延长油田寿命和优化生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimising Reservoir Top Structure Uncertainty through Integration of Seismic Horizon Well-Tied Top Interpretation and Geosteering Distance-to-Bed-Boundary Calculation from Azimuthal Resistivity Tool: Case Study from Offshore Thailand
Reservoir top structure interpretation through seismic usually associated with uncertainty especially when sparse number of wells are available. This leads to uncertainty in gross rock volume and oil-in-place calculation. It is quite common with reservoir top interpretation picking varies significantly from optimistic to pessimistic case especially at the point distant away from wellbore. This paper integrates the geosteering distance-to-boundary (DTB) calculation from horizontal well drilling to minimize the uncertainty window of top interpretation from surface seismic to deliver more accurate remaining oil-in place. During the geosteering operation, seismic horizon interpretation of reservoir target sand with multiple scenarios in offshore field was compared with the distance to boundary calculation that map the reservoir top structure with azimuthal resistivity tool. Prior to geosteer horizontal well in the oil-rim reservoir after long production, pilot hole was drilled to update the current fluid contact. Reservoir top interpretation is revised by including horizon top structure tied to well data from the pilot hole and existing wells in the area. The revised top structure which includes the pessimistic and optimistic case generally has significant difference in remaining OIP. Upon geosteering horizontal well, DTB calculation from azimuthal resistivity tool was capable to map the top reservoir boundary in real-time with reference from the seismic top interpretation from heel to toe of the lateral with good quality mapping of entire top reservoir structure. Distance to boundary (DTB) with good quality of top reservoir structure mapping throughout the section tracked closely to optimistic case of seismic top interpretation of target sand. Geosteering with azimuthal resistivity with RSS directional tool mapped the top of the reservoir on the upside and OWC from the downside up to 4.8 m away from the tool. As the top is expected to dip down and intersected the trajectory at multiple scenarios, the mapped boundary provided insights of gentle dipping trend, suggesting the top of reservoir could extend laterally longer than pessimistic case. With the result closer to optimistic case, the calculated remaining OIP volume calculated was on the optimistic side with significant difference, larger volume, from pessimistic case of OIP calculation. Integration of seismic top interpretation with geosteering distance to boundary application in lateral well could minimize the uncertainty in reservoir top horizon interpretation. The workflow enabled to place the well in the sweet spot while managing the uncertainty of top structure. With production from horizontal well, the well production rate is expected to increase to 2900 BOPD for initial oil production compare to below 1000 BOPD prior to horizontal well drilling. This workflow could be applied for future lateral well with high uncertainty of the target to place the well in sweetspot for field life extension and production optimization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信