使用默认逻辑的智能文本处理

A. Hunter
{"title":"使用默认逻辑的智能文本处理","authors":"A. Hunter","doi":"10.1109/TAI.1996.560397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a need to develop more intelligent means for handling text in applications such as information retrieval, information filtering, and message classification. This raises the need for mechanisms for ascertaining what an item of text is about. Even though natural language processing offers the best results, it is not always viable. A less accurate, but more viable alternative, is to reason with keywords in the text. Unfortunately, classical reasoning is often inadequate for determining from some keywords what a text is about. In particular it does not allow context-dependent interpretation of keywords. So for example, if some text has the keyword oil, it is usually also about minerals, though with exceptions such as when it has the keyword cooling. To address this kind of problem, we consider a model of \"aboutness\" based on default logic.","PeriodicalId":209171,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","volume":"329 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intelligent text handling using default logic\",\"authors\":\"A. Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TAI.1996.560397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a need to develop more intelligent means for handling text in applications such as information retrieval, information filtering, and message classification. This raises the need for mechanisms for ascertaining what an item of text is about. Even though natural language processing offers the best results, it is not always viable. A less accurate, but more viable alternative, is to reason with keywords in the text. Unfortunately, classical reasoning is often inadequate for determining from some keywords what a text is about. In particular it does not allow context-dependent interpretation of keywords. So for example, if some text has the keyword oil, it is usually also about minerals, though with exceptions such as when it has the keyword cooling. To address this kind of problem, we consider a model of \\\"aboutness\\\" based on default logic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":209171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"329 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.1996.560397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.1996.560397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

需要开发更智能的方法来处理应用程序中的文本,如信息检索、信息过滤和消息分类。这就提出了确定文本内容的机制的需求。尽管自然语言处理提供了最好的结果,但它并不总是可行的。一个不太准确但更可行的替代方法是使用文本中的关键字进行推理。不幸的是,经典推理往往不足以从一些关键词来确定文本的内容。特别是,它不允许对关键字进行上下文相关的解释。例如,如果一些文本有关键字油,它通常也是关于矿物的,尽管有例外,比如当它有关键字冷却。为了解决这类问题,我们考虑一个基于默认逻辑的“about”模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intelligent text handling using default logic
There is a need to develop more intelligent means for handling text in applications such as information retrieval, information filtering, and message classification. This raises the need for mechanisms for ascertaining what an item of text is about. Even though natural language processing offers the best results, it is not always viable. A less accurate, but more viable alternative, is to reason with keywords in the text. Unfortunately, classical reasoning is often inadequate for determining from some keywords what a text is about. In particular it does not allow context-dependent interpretation of keywords. So for example, if some text has the keyword oil, it is usually also about minerals, though with exceptions such as when it has the keyword cooling. To address this kind of problem, we consider a model of "aboutness" based on default logic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信