正在进行的工作-一般工程项目评估-我们处于什么位置?

A. Masoom, F. Masoom
{"title":"正在进行的工作-一般工程项目评估-我们处于什么位置?","authors":"A. Masoom, F. Masoom","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2004.1408477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying and adopting suitable assessment methods are the beginning steps in planning for an accreditation process of a program. For a non-degree-granting department such as the General Engineering Department at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville, where do we begin? It is not a degree-granting department; rather it feeds students into the pipeline of the majors after they have completed the basic and core engineering science courses. Assessment requires and reflects a long-term commitment to the program and its constituencies, viz., the students, alumni and industry partners. Like most engineering programs, we have a long history of self-assessment and improvement. However, we had a little documentation of processes already in place. This paper is a discussion of possible assessment measures for departments such as ours and also raises questions about what more could be done.","PeriodicalId":339926,"journal":{"name":"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work in progress - general engineering program assessment - where do we stand?\",\"authors\":\"A. Masoom, F. Masoom\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2004.1408477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Identifying and adopting suitable assessment methods are the beginning steps in planning for an accreditation process of a program. For a non-degree-granting department such as the General Engineering Department at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville, where do we begin? It is not a degree-granting department; rather it feeds students into the pipeline of the majors after they have completed the basic and core engineering science courses. Assessment requires and reflects a long-term commitment to the program and its constituencies, viz., the students, alumni and industry partners. Like most engineering programs, we have a long history of self-assessment and improvement. However, we had a little documentation of processes already in place. This paper is a discussion of possible assessment measures for departments such as ours and also raises questions about what more could be done.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2004.1408477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2004.1408477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定和采用合适的评估方法是规划一个项目认证过程的第一步。对于一个不授予学位的部门,比如威斯康星大学普拉特维尔分校的通用工程系,我们从哪里开始呢?它不是一个授予学位的部门;相反,它在学生完成基础和核心工程科学课程后,将他们送入专业的管道。评估要求并反映了对项目及其支持者(即学生、校友和行业合作伙伴)的长期承诺。像大多数工程项目一样,我们有很长的自我评估和改进的历史。然而,我们已经有了一些流程文档。本文是对我们这样的部门可能采取的评估措施的讨论,也提出了更多的问题,可以做些什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Work in progress - general engineering program assessment - where do we stand?
Identifying and adopting suitable assessment methods are the beginning steps in planning for an accreditation process of a program. For a non-degree-granting department such as the General Engineering Department at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville, where do we begin? It is not a degree-granting department; rather it feeds students into the pipeline of the majors after they have completed the basic and core engineering science courses. Assessment requires and reflects a long-term commitment to the program and its constituencies, viz., the students, alumni and industry partners. Like most engineering programs, we have a long history of self-assessment and improvement. However, we had a little documentation of processes already in place. This paper is a discussion of possible assessment measures for departments such as ours and also raises questions about what more could be done.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信