Vladimir Rupanov, C. Buckl, Ludger Fiege, M. Armbruster, A. Knoll, G. Spiegelberg
{"title":"根据ISO 26262对E/E架构设计决策进行早期安全评估","authors":"Vladimir Rupanov, C. Buckl, Ludger Fiege, M. Armbruster, A. Knoll, G. Spiegelberg","doi":"10.1145/2304656.2304658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ISO 26262 addresses development of safe in-vehicle functions by specifying methods potentially used in the design and development lifecycle. It does not indicate what is sufficient and leaves room for interpretation. However, the architects of electric/electronic systems need design boundaries to make decisions during architecture evolution without adding a risk of late architectural changes. Designing and changing a system benefits from correct selection of safety mechanisms at early design stages. This paper presents an iterative architecture design and refinement process that is centered around ISO 26262 requirements. We propose a domain-specific modeling scheme and component repositories to build up a bottom-up analysis framework that allows early quantitative safety evaluation. To guarantee that the target ASIL level can be reached, we complement our design-time component-level analysis with conservative top-down analysis. Given that analysis starts at early design stages, evolution of the architecture is supported by different levels of detail used in the analysis framework.","PeriodicalId":199564,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Architecting Critical Systems","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early safety evaluation of design decisions in E/E architecture according to ISO 26262\",\"authors\":\"Vladimir Rupanov, C. Buckl, Ludger Fiege, M. Armbruster, A. Knoll, G. Spiegelberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2304656.2304658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ISO 26262 addresses development of safe in-vehicle functions by specifying methods potentially used in the design and development lifecycle. It does not indicate what is sufficient and leaves room for interpretation. However, the architects of electric/electronic systems need design boundaries to make decisions during architecture evolution without adding a risk of late architectural changes. Designing and changing a system benefits from correct selection of safety mechanisms at early design stages. This paper presents an iterative architecture design and refinement process that is centered around ISO 26262 requirements. We propose a domain-specific modeling scheme and component repositories to build up a bottom-up analysis framework that allows early quantitative safety evaluation. To guarantee that the target ASIL level can be reached, we complement our design-time component-level analysis with conservative top-down analysis. Given that analysis starts at early design stages, evolution of the architecture is supported by different levels of detail used in the analysis framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Symposium on Architecting Critical Systems\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Symposium on Architecting Critical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2304656.2304658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Architecting Critical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2304656.2304658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
摘要
ISO 26262通过指定在设计和开发生命周期中可能使用的方法来解决安全车载功能的开发问题。它没有指出什么是充分的,并留下了解释的余地。然而,电气/电子系统的架构师需要设计边界来在架构演变过程中做出决策,而不会增加后期架构更改的风险。设计和更改系统得益于在早期设计阶段正确选择安全机制。本文提出了一个围绕ISO 26262要求的迭代架构设计和改进过程。我们提出一个领域特定的建模方案和组件存储库来构建一个自底向上的分析框架,允许早期的定量安全评估。为了保证达到目标ASIL级别,我们用保守的自顶向下的分析来补充我们的设计时组件级别分析。假设分析开始于早期设计阶段,那么体系结构的发展是由分析框架中使用的不同层次的细节支持的。
Early safety evaluation of design decisions in E/E architecture according to ISO 26262
ISO 26262 addresses development of safe in-vehicle functions by specifying methods potentially used in the design and development lifecycle. It does not indicate what is sufficient and leaves room for interpretation. However, the architects of electric/electronic systems need design boundaries to make decisions during architecture evolution without adding a risk of late architectural changes. Designing and changing a system benefits from correct selection of safety mechanisms at early design stages. This paper presents an iterative architecture design and refinement process that is centered around ISO 26262 requirements. We propose a domain-specific modeling scheme and component repositories to build up a bottom-up analysis framework that allows early quantitative safety evaluation. To guarantee that the target ASIL level can be reached, we complement our design-time component-level analysis with conservative top-down analysis. Given that analysis starts at early design stages, evolution of the architecture is supported by different levels of detail used in the analysis framework.