重新审视印度国家麻醉药品和精神药物政策:一个重要的评价

Prashant Chakravarty, Dr. Azimkhan Pathan
{"title":"重新审视印度国家麻醉药品和精神药物政策:一个重要的评价","authors":"Prashant Chakravarty, Dr. Azimkhan Pathan","doi":"10.36647/jpri/02.02.a004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Commonly, this legal instrument, which serves as the foundation for the current global drug enforcement structure centred by the UN System, is misunderstood as merely a convention to integrate all previous international security agreements. This is a fallacious position that provides no historical background for contemporary discussions concerning the modification of a similar international agreement system. From a historic and international relations approach, this essay recreates the development of the Convention. A criticism of fundamental pre-1961 agreements is preceded by a comprehensive evaluation of the government records of a United Nations gathering for adopted families of the a Single Symposium on Narcotic Drugs as well as an examination of a status of the treaty as a \"solitary\" conference in light of successive treaties. The Single Conference on Controlled Substances constitutes a substantial departure from of the locus of control of earlier international conventions; a shift to a more prohibitive perspective that, in terms of international interactions, could be regarded as a transitional government as opposed to the a mere formalisation of earlier instruments. In this way, the essay stresses the eradication of drug use, which has been deeply ingrained in the cultural, economic, and religious traditions of numerous non-Western societies for millennia. In addition, despite being frequently disregarded, this Agreement has failed to perform its stated function as the \"only\" international instrument for drug control. As a result of the additional treaties signed in later years and the shifting socioeconomic and political settings, the control system contains substantial inconsistencies. Even if a shift of prescriptive focus has happened, this paper suggests that a single panel discussion of Controlled Drugs should be revived in order to correct past mistakes and contradictions within the government, especially with relation to scheduling and conventional narcotic use. Keywords : — Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances policy, traditional drug.","PeriodicalId":419985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Innovation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting The National Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances policy of India: A Critical Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Prashant Chakravarty, Dr. Azimkhan Pathan\",\"doi\":\"10.36647/jpri/02.02.a004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Commonly, this legal instrument, which serves as the foundation for the current global drug enforcement structure centred by the UN System, is misunderstood as merely a convention to integrate all previous international security agreements. This is a fallacious position that provides no historical background for contemporary discussions concerning the modification of a similar international agreement system. From a historic and international relations approach, this essay recreates the development of the Convention. A criticism of fundamental pre-1961 agreements is preceded by a comprehensive evaluation of the government records of a United Nations gathering for adopted families of the a Single Symposium on Narcotic Drugs as well as an examination of a status of the treaty as a \\\"solitary\\\" conference in light of successive treaties. The Single Conference on Controlled Substances constitutes a substantial departure from of the locus of control of earlier international conventions; a shift to a more prohibitive perspective that, in terms of international interactions, could be regarded as a transitional government as opposed to the a mere formalisation of earlier instruments. In this way, the essay stresses the eradication of drug use, which has been deeply ingrained in the cultural, economic, and religious traditions of numerous non-Western societies for millennia. In addition, despite being frequently disregarded, this Agreement has failed to perform its stated function as the \\\"only\\\" international instrument for drug control. As a result of the additional treaties signed in later years and the shifting socioeconomic and political settings, the control system contains substantial inconsistencies. Even if a shift of prescriptive focus has happened, this paper suggests that a single panel discussion of Controlled Drugs should be revived in order to correct past mistakes and contradictions within the government, especially with relation to scheduling and conventional narcotic use. Keywords : — Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances policy, traditional drug.\",\"PeriodicalId\":419985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36647/jpri/02.02.a004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36647/jpri/02.02.a004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项法律文书是目前以联合国系统为中心的全球禁毒执法结构的基础,但通常被误解为仅仅是一项整合以往所有国际安全协定的公约。这是一个错误的立场,没有为当代关于修改类似国际协定制度的讨论提供历史背景。本文从历史和国际关系的角度,再现了《公约》的发展历程。在对1961年以前各项基本协定提出批评之前,首先全面评价联合国为被收养家庭举行的一次麻醉药品单一专题讨论会的政府记录,并根据一系列条约审查该条约作为“单独”会议的地位。单一管制物质会议大大偏离了以前各项国际公约的管制地点;从国际交往的角度来看,转向一种更具禁止性的观点,可以被视为一个过渡政府,而不仅仅是早期文书的形式化。通过这种方式,这篇文章强调了根除毒品的使用,几千年来,毒品在许多非西方社会的文化、经济和宗教传统中已经根深蒂固。此外,尽管《协定》经常被忽视,但它未能履行其作为“唯一”国际药物管制文书的既定职能。由于后来几年签署的额外条约以及不断变化的社会经济和政治环境,控制系统存在很大的不一致性。即使发生了规定焦点的转移,本文建议应该恢复对管制药物的单一小组讨论,以纠正政府内部过去的错误和矛盾,特别是与计划和常规麻醉药品使用有关的问题。关键词:麻醉药品,精神药物政策,传统药物
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting The National Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances policy of India: A Critical Evaluation
Commonly, this legal instrument, which serves as the foundation for the current global drug enforcement structure centred by the UN System, is misunderstood as merely a convention to integrate all previous international security agreements. This is a fallacious position that provides no historical background for contemporary discussions concerning the modification of a similar international agreement system. From a historic and international relations approach, this essay recreates the development of the Convention. A criticism of fundamental pre-1961 agreements is preceded by a comprehensive evaluation of the government records of a United Nations gathering for adopted families of the a Single Symposium on Narcotic Drugs as well as an examination of a status of the treaty as a "solitary" conference in light of successive treaties. The Single Conference on Controlled Substances constitutes a substantial departure from of the locus of control of earlier international conventions; a shift to a more prohibitive perspective that, in terms of international interactions, could be regarded as a transitional government as opposed to the a mere formalisation of earlier instruments. In this way, the essay stresses the eradication of drug use, which has been deeply ingrained in the cultural, economic, and religious traditions of numerous non-Western societies for millennia. In addition, despite being frequently disregarded, this Agreement has failed to perform its stated function as the "only" international instrument for drug control. As a result of the additional treaties signed in later years and the shifting socioeconomic and political settings, the control system contains substantial inconsistencies. Even if a shift of prescriptive focus has happened, this paper suggests that a single panel discussion of Controlled Drugs should be revived in order to correct past mistakes and contradictions within the government, especially with relation to scheduling and conventional narcotic use. Keywords : — Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances policy, traditional drug.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信