集中式无线接入网光前调技术性能比较

A. Delmade, D. Venkitesh, R. D. Koilpillai
{"title":"集中式无线接入网光前调技术性能比较","authors":"A. Delmade, D. Venkitesh, R. D. Koilpillai","doi":"10.1109/ANTS.2016.7947836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work presents performance comparison of three schemes for fronthauling in Centralized Radio Access Network Architecture (C-RAN) namely, Digitized Baseband over Fiber (DBBoF), Analog Intermediate Frequency over Fiber (AIFoF) and Digitized Intermediate Frequency over Fiber (DIFoF). The SNR and optical power requirements for each of these schemes for a transmission of 20 MHz and 160 MHz WLAN signals through an AWGN wireless channel are compared through simulations. Results indicates that DBBoF and DIFoF techniques require 5 dBm smaller optical power than AIFoF to require same SNR of 17 dB to achieve BER of 10−3 for 20 MHz signal. For 160 MHz signal DBBoF yields a better performance compared to AIFoF for the same optical power levels, but requires larger line rates.","PeriodicalId":248902,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS)","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of optical fronthauling techniques for centralized radio access network\",\"authors\":\"A. Delmade, D. Venkitesh, R. D. Koilpillai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ANTS.2016.7947836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work presents performance comparison of three schemes for fronthauling in Centralized Radio Access Network Architecture (C-RAN) namely, Digitized Baseband over Fiber (DBBoF), Analog Intermediate Frequency over Fiber (AIFoF) and Digitized Intermediate Frequency over Fiber (DIFoF). The SNR and optical power requirements for each of these schemes for a transmission of 20 MHz and 160 MHz WLAN signals through an AWGN wireless channel are compared through simulations. Results indicates that DBBoF and DIFoF techniques require 5 dBm smaller optical power than AIFoF to require same SNR of 17 dB to achieve BER of 10−3 for 20 MHz signal. For 160 MHz signal DBBoF yields a better performance compared to AIFoF for the same optical power levels, but requires larger line rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":248902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS)\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTS.2016.7947836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTS.2016.7947836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文介绍了集中式无线接入网架构(C-RAN)中三种前端处理方案的性能比较,即数字化基带光纤(DBBoF)、模拟中频光纤(AIFoF)和数字化中频光纤(DIFoF)。通过仿真比较了每种方案在通过AWGN无线信道传输20 MHz和160 MHz WLAN信号时的信噪比和光功率要求。结果表明,对于20mhz信号,DBBoF和DIFoF技术所需的光功率比AIFoF小5 dBm,信噪比为17 dB,而BER为10−3。对于160 MHz的信号,DBBoF在相同的光功率水平下比AIFoF产生更好的性能,但需要更大的线路速率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance comparison of optical fronthauling techniques for centralized radio access network
This work presents performance comparison of three schemes for fronthauling in Centralized Radio Access Network Architecture (C-RAN) namely, Digitized Baseband over Fiber (DBBoF), Analog Intermediate Frequency over Fiber (AIFoF) and Digitized Intermediate Frequency over Fiber (DIFoF). The SNR and optical power requirements for each of these schemes for a transmission of 20 MHz and 160 MHz WLAN signals through an AWGN wireless channel are compared through simulations. Results indicates that DBBoF and DIFoF techniques require 5 dBm smaller optical power than AIFoF to require same SNR of 17 dB to achieve BER of 10−3 for 20 MHz signal. For 160 MHz signal DBBoF yields a better performance compared to AIFoF for the same optical power levels, but requires larger line rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信