{"title":"集中式无线接入网光前调技术性能比较","authors":"A. Delmade, D. Venkitesh, R. D. Koilpillai","doi":"10.1109/ANTS.2016.7947836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work presents performance comparison of three schemes for fronthauling in Centralized Radio Access Network Architecture (C-RAN) namely, Digitized Baseband over Fiber (DBBoF), Analog Intermediate Frequency over Fiber (AIFoF) and Digitized Intermediate Frequency over Fiber (DIFoF). The SNR and optical power requirements for each of these schemes for a transmission of 20 MHz and 160 MHz WLAN signals through an AWGN wireless channel are compared through simulations. Results indicates that DBBoF and DIFoF techniques require 5 dBm smaller optical power than AIFoF to require same SNR of 17 dB to achieve BER of 10−3 for 20 MHz signal. For 160 MHz signal DBBoF yields a better performance compared to AIFoF for the same optical power levels, but requires larger line rates.","PeriodicalId":248902,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS)","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of optical fronthauling techniques for centralized radio access network\",\"authors\":\"A. Delmade, D. Venkitesh, R. D. Koilpillai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ANTS.2016.7947836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work presents performance comparison of three schemes for fronthauling in Centralized Radio Access Network Architecture (C-RAN) namely, Digitized Baseband over Fiber (DBBoF), Analog Intermediate Frequency over Fiber (AIFoF) and Digitized Intermediate Frequency over Fiber (DIFoF). The SNR and optical power requirements for each of these schemes for a transmission of 20 MHz and 160 MHz WLAN signals through an AWGN wireless channel are compared through simulations. Results indicates that DBBoF and DIFoF techniques require 5 dBm smaller optical power than AIFoF to require same SNR of 17 dB to achieve BER of 10−3 for 20 MHz signal. For 160 MHz signal DBBoF yields a better performance compared to AIFoF for the same optical power levels, but requires larger line rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":248902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS)\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTS.2016.7947836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTS.2016.7947836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance comparison of optical fronthauling techniques for centralized radio access network
This work presents performance comparison of three schemes for fronthauling in Centralized Radio Access Network Architecture (C-RAN) namely, Digitized Baseband over Fiber (DBBoF), Analog Intermediate Frequency over Fiber (AIFoF) and Digitized Intermediate Frequency over Fiber (DIFoF). The SNR and optical power requirements for each of these schemes for a transmission of 20 MHz and 160 MHz WLAN signals through an AWGN wireless channel are compared through simulations. Results indicates that DBBoF and DIFoF techniques require 5 dBm smaller optical power than AIFoF to require same SNR of 17 dB to achieve BER of 10−3 for 20 MHz signal. For 160 MHz signal DBBoF yields a better performance compared to AIFoF for the same optical power levels, but requires larger line rates.