关于共同创造和共同生产研究中的对话参与和各种研究人员立场的批判性讨论

A. Bager, Lone Hersted, O. Ness
{"title":"关于共同创造和共同生产研究中的对话参与和各种研究人员立场的批判性讨论","authors":"A. Bager, Lone Hersted, O. Ness","doi":"10.54337/academicquarter.vi24.7247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we introduce volume two of our themed issue on co-creation and co-production and discuss various basic assumptions related to collaborative research. In collaborative studies in general, dialogue is often highlighted as an important process element with important implications for empowerment for those involved. However, the underlying understandings and implications of dialogic practice are seldom examined in depth. We raise a critical reflexive discussion on different approaches to dialogic engagement and present four high-level discourses guiding organizational scholarship to discuss crucial differences and similarities. Moreover, we outline seven researcher ideal types that reflect diverse degrees of dialogic engagement. Our aspiration is to provide useful insights, models, and questions that can guide participatory scholars in fostering critical awareness of their own position and the sometimes taken-for-granted assumptions guiding their studies.","PeriodicalId":285489,"journal":{"name":"Academic Quarter | Akademisk kvarter","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical discussion on dialogic engagement and various researcher positions in research concerning co-creation and co-production\",\"authors\":\"A. Bager, Lone Hersted, O. Ness\",\"doi\":\"10.54337/academicquarter.vi24.7247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we introduce volume two of our themed issue on co-creation and co-production and discuss various basic assumptions related to collaborative research. In collaborative studies in general, dialogue is often highlighted as an important process element with important implications for empowerment for those involved. However, the underlying understandings and implications of dialogic practice are seldom examined in depth. We raise a critical reflexive discussion on different approaches to dialogic engagement and present four high-level discourses guiding organizational scholarship to discuss crucial differences and similarities. Moreover, we outline seven researcher ideal types that reflect diverse degrees of dialogic engagement. Our aspiration is to provide useful insights, models, and questions that can guide participatory scholars in fostering critical awareness of their own position and the sometimes taken-for-granted assumptions guiding their studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Quarter | Akademisk kvarter\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Quarter | Akademisk kvarter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54337/academicquarter.vi24.7247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Quarter | Akademisk kvarter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54337/academicquarter.vi24.7247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们将介绍关于共同创造和共同生产的主题问题的第二卷,并讨论与合作研究相关的各种基本假设。在一般的合作研究中,对话往往被强调为一个重要的过程要素,对赋予有关人员权力具有重要影响。然而,对话练习的潜在理解和含义很少被深入研究。我们对对话参与的不同方法进行了批判性的反思性讨论,并提出了四种指导组织学术讨论关键差异和相似之处的高级话语。此外,我们概述了七种研究者理想类型,反映了不同程度的对话参与。我们的愿望是提供有用的见解、模型和问题,以指导参与式学者培养对自己立场的批判性意识,以及指导他们研究的有时被视为理所当然的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical discussion on dialogic engagement and various researcher positions in research concerning co-creation and co-production
In this article, we introduce volume two of our themed issue on co-creation and co-production and discuss various basic assumptions related to collaborative research. In collaborative studies in general, dialogue is often highlighted as an important process element with important implications for empowerment for those involved. However, the underlying understandings and implications of dialogic practice are seldom examined in depth. We raise a critical reflexive discussion on different approaches to dialogic engagement and present four high-level discourses guiding organizational scholarship to discuss crucial differences and similarities. Moreover, we outline seven researcher ideal types that reflect diverse degrees of dialogic engagement. Our aspiration is to provide useful insights, models, and questions that can guide participatory scholars in fostering critical awareness of their own position and the sometimes taken-for-granted assumptions guiding their studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信