将意志力纳入决策理论

Natalie Gold
{"title":"将意志力纳入决策理论","authors":"Natalie Gold","doi":"10.1017/9781108329170.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". In decision-theory, problems of self-control can be modelled as problems of intra-personal cooperation, between a series of transient agents who each make choices at particular times. Early agents in the series can try to influence the actions of later agents, but there is no rational way to exert willpower. I show how willpower can be introduced into decision theory by applying the theory of team reasoning, which was originally developed to understand cooperation between individuals in groups and allows that there can be multiple levels of agency, the individual and the team. In the case of intertemporal choice, the levels are the transient agent and the person over time. Intra-personal team reasoning, understood as a psychological process of identifying with the person over time, can generate a plausible theory of rational control if the intertemporal problem is structured as a threshold public goods game. In this framework, willpower is the ability to align one’s present self with one’s extended interests by identifying with the person over time. I show how intra-personal team reasoning creates a space for resolutions in decision theory and how it resolves a puzzle that exists in accounts that understand willpower as making and then not reconsidering resolutions.","PeriodicalId":436463,"journal":{"name":"Self-Control, Decision Theory, and Rationality","volume":"1571 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Putting Willpower into Decision Theory\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Gold\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108329170.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". In decision-theory, problems of self-control can be modelled as problems of intra-personal cooperation, between a series of transient agents who each make choices at particular times. Early agents in the series can try to influence the actions of later agents, but there is no rational way to exert willpower. I show how willpower can be introduced into decision theory by applying the theory of team reasoning, which was originally developed to understand cooperation between individuals in groups and allows that there can be multiple levels of agency, the individual and the team. In the case of intertemporal choice, the levels are the transient agent and the person over time. Intra-personal team reasoning, understood as a psychological process of identifying with the person over time, can generate a plausible theory of rational control if the intertemporal problem is structured as a threshold public goods game. In this framework, willpower is the ability to align one’s present self with one’s extended interests by identifying with the person over time. I show how intra-personal team reasoning creates a space for resolutions in decision theory and how it resolves a puzzle that exists in accounts that understand willpower as making and then not reconsidering resolutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Self-Control, Decision Theory, and Rationality\",\"volume\":\"1571 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Self-Control, Decision Theory, and Rationality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108329170.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Self-Control, Decision Theory, and Rationality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108329170.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

. 在决策理论中,自我控制的问题可以被建模为个人内部合作的问题,在一系列短暂的代理之间,每个代理在特定的时间做出选择。系列中的早期主体可以尝试影响后期主体的行为,但没有合理的方式来发挥意志力。我展示了如何通过应用团队推理理论将意志力引入决策理论,团队推理最初是为了理解群体中个人之间的合作而发展起来的,并允许有多个层次的代理,个人和团队。在跨期选择的情况下,水平是短暂的代理和人随着时间的推移。个人内部团队推理被理解为一种随着时间的推移而认同他人的心理过程,如果跨期问题被构建为一种门槛公共产品博弈,则可以产生一种合理的理性控制理论。在这个框架中,意志力是一种通过长期认同他人,将现在的自己与长远利益结合起来的能力。我展示了个人内部的团队推理如何在决策理论中为决心创造空间,以及它如何解决存在于将意志力理解为做出决定然后不重新考虑的账户中的难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Putting Willpower into Decision Theory
. In decision-theory, problems of self-control can be modelled as problems of intra-personal cooperation, between a series of transient agents who each make choices at particular times. Early agents in the series can try to influence the actions of later agents, but there is no rational way to exert willpower. I show how willpower can be introduced into decision theory by applying the theory of team reasoning, which was originally developed to understand cooperation between individuals in groups and allows that there can be multiple levels of agency, the individual and the team. In the case of intertemporal choice, the levels are the transient agent and the person over time. Intra-personal team reasoning, understood as a psychological process of identifying with the person over time, can generate a plausible theory of rational control if the intertemporal problem is structured as a threshold public goods game. In this framework, willpower is the ability to align one’s present self with one’s extended interests by identifying with the person over time. I show how intra-personal team reasoning creates a space for resolutions in decision theory and how it resolves a puzzle that exists in accounts that understand willpower as making and then not reconsidering resolutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信