超宽带和蓝牙低功耗室内定位技术的安全威胁与性能评估

İsmail Dervişoğlu, U. Yavanoglu
{"title":"超宽带和蓝牙低功耗室内定位技术的安全威胁与性能评估","authors":"İsmail Dervişoğlu, U. Yavanoglu","doi":"10.1109/ISCTURKEY53027.2021.9654342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most basic positioning technology GPS cannot be used effectively due to the distortion of its signals in closed areas. Therefore, different technologies are used for positioning within these areas. Examples of these technologies include Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), a low-power and cost-effective technology, and Ultra Wideband (UWB) technologies that have many advantages by broadcasting with short pulses at high bandwidth. In this study, indoor positioning systems were developed using BLE and UWB technologies, and security threats and location prediction performances of these systems were examined. There are differences between BLE and UWB technologies such as standard, bandwidth and distance estimation algorithms. Because of these differences, the security threats related to these two technologies differ. In this context, security problems that may arise depending on the technology used in the system are mentioned. In addition, the performance of these systems developed using these two different technologies, was compared by conducting distance and positioning tests in the same area with an area of 12m x 15m. In the tests conducted to compare the positioning performance from these tests, it was calculated that the UWB indoor positioning system had a positioning error of 0.43 m and the BLE indoor positioning system had a positioning error of 1.54 m in the same environment.","PeriodicalId":383915,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Information Security and Cryptology (ISCTURKEY)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Security Threats and Performance Evaluation of Ultra Wideband and Bluetooth Low Energy Technologies for Indoor Positioning\",\"authors\":\"İsmail Dervişoğlu, U. Yavanoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCTURKEY53027.2021.9654342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most basic positioning technology GPS cannot be used effectively due to the distortion of its signals in closed areas. Therefore, different technologies are used for positioning within these areas. Examples of these technologies include Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), a low-power and cost-effective technology, and Ultra Wideband (UWB) technologies that have many advantages by broadcasting with short pulses at high bandwidth. In this study, indoor positioning systems were developed using BLE and UWB technologies, and security threats and location prediction performances of these systems were examined. There are differences between BLE and UWB technologies such as standard, bandwidth and distance estimation algorithms. Because of these differences, the security threats related to these two technologies differ. In this context, security problems that may arise depending on the technology used in the system are mentioned. In addition, the performance of these systems developed using these two different technologies, was compared by conducting distance and positioning tests in the same area with an area of 12m x 15m. In the tests conducted to compare the positioning performance from these tests, it was calculated that the UWB indoor positioning system had a positioning error of 0.43 m and the BLE indoor positioning system had a positioning error of 1.54 m in the same environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference on Information Security and Cryptology (ISCTURKEY)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference on Information Security and Cryptology (ISCTURKEY)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCTURKEY53027.2021.9654342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Information Security and Cryptology (ISCTURKEY)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCTURKEY53027.2021.9654342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最基本的定位技术GPS在封闭区域由于信号失真而无法有效利用。因此,在这些区域内使用不同的技术进行定位。这些技术的例子包括低功耗低成本技术蓝牙(BLE)和超宽带(UWB)技术,UWB技术通过在高带宽下以短脉冲广播具有许多优势。在本研究中,利用BLE和UWB技术开发了室内定位系统,并对这些系统的安全威胁和位置预测性能进行了测试。低频段和超宽带技术在标准、带宽和距离估计算法等方面存在差异。由于这些差异,与这两种技术相关的安全威胁也不同。在此上下文中,提到了根据系统中使用的技术可能出现的安全问题。此外,利用这两种不同技术开发的这些系统的性能,通过在同一区域进行距离和定位测试,面积为12米× 15米。在对比这些测试的定位性能的测试中,计算出在相同环境下,UWB室内定位系统的定位误差为0.43 m, BLE室内定位系统的定位误差为1.54 m。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Security Threats and Performance Evaluation of Ultra Wideband and Bluetooth Low Energy Technologies for Indoor Positioning
The most basic positioning technology GPS cannot be used effectively due to the distortion of its signals in closed areas. Therefore, different technologies are used for positioning within these areas. Examples of these technologies include Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), a low-power and cost-effective technology, and Ultra Wideband (UWB) technologies that have many advantages by broadcasting with short pulses at high bandwidth. In this study, indoor positioning systems were developed using BLE and UWB technologies, and security threats and location prediction performances of these systems were examined. There are differences between BLE and UWB technologies such as standard, bandwidth and distance estimation algorithms. Because of these differences, the security threats related to these two technologies differ. In this context, security problems that may arise depending on the technology used in the system are mentioned. In addition, the performance of these systems developed using these two different technologies, was compared by conducting distance and positioning tests in the same area with an area of 12m x 15m. In the tests conducted to compare the positioning performance from these tests, it was calculated that the UWB indoor positioning system had a positioning error of 0.43 m and the BLE indoor positioning system had a positioning error of 1.54 m in the same environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信