欧洲大学的伊斯兰神学

{"title":"欧洲大学的伊斯兰神学","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110752410-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Muslim presence in Europe has a long and ambivalent history, which differs from country to country. Every European country has its own history of encounter with Islam that is shaped by its own context. That is why different models and traditions have developed within the European countries for interacting with Islam, which means that, given the various approaches and practices in individual countries, it is impossible to speak of a pan-European outlook. Despite the different historically conditioned approaches of individual European countries to Islam, the developments in the 1960s and 1970s, when increased Muslim workers were recruited, showed similarities across borders. An oft-recurring assumption in the European context concerning the Muslim ‘guest worker’ is manifest in the expectation that the new arrivals would only be in Europe for a limited time and would then return to their home countries. Not only did the host countries – which recruited these people for economic reasons – think this would be the case, but the guest workers themselves, who had come for the same reasons, thought so as well. That is why nothing much was done to integrate the new workers into society. The new workers were not expected to adjust to society, nor did the governments initiate the process of naturalisation. As would be emphasised later, it was a serious oversight, for things turned out quite differently than was first expected. The guest workers stayed longer and brought their families over from their native countries, which meant that, in distinction from their previous isolated lives, they were forced to some extent by the influx of their families to actively participate in public life. These developments revealed the omissions of the preceding years. It also became clear that the former guest workers and their family members had in the meantime become an integral part of society. But there were no models for integration that could correct the omissions and make the integration of the migrants into society easier. The gradual change in the profile of the former guest workers, who had in the meantime become residents and whose children attended local schools, led to the first tentative steps towards integration. These initial considerations on integration first focused almost exclusively on learning German because inadequate knowledge of the language represented a major obstacle to communication that had in the meantime become unavoidable. The religious needs of Muslims, however, played no significant role, even though the debates on integration had greatly increased in the meantime.","PeriodicalId":188523,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Islamic Theology in European Universities\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110752410-003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Muslim presence in Europe has a long and ambivalent history, which differs from country to country. Every European country has its own history of encounter with Islam that is shaped by its own context. That is why different models and traditions have developed within the European countries for interacting with Islam, which means that, given the various approaches and practices in individual countries, it is impossible to speak of a pan-European outlook. Despite the different historically conditioned approaches of individual European countries to Islam, the developments in the 1960s and 1970s, when increased Muslim workers were recruited, showed similarities across borders. An oft-recurring assumption in the European context concerning the Muslim ‘guest worker’ is manifest in the expectation that the new arrivals would only be in Europe for a limited time and would then return to their home countries. Not only did the host countries – which recruited these people for economic reasons – think this would be the case, but the guest workers themselves, who had come for the same reasons, thought so as well. That is why nothing much was done to integrate the new workers into society. The new workers were not expected to adjust to society, nor did the governments initiate the process of naturalisation. As would be emphasised later, it was a serious oversight, for things turned out quite differently than was first expected. The guest workers stayed longer and brought their families over from their native countries, which meant that, in distinction from their previous isolated lives, they were forced to some extent by the influx of their families to actively participate in public life. These developments revealed the omissions of the preceding years. It also became clear that the former guest workers and their family members had in the meantime become an integral part of society. But there were no models for integration that could correct the omissions and make the integration of the migrants into society easier. The gradual change in the profile of the former guest workers, who had in the meantime become residents and whose children attended local schools, led to the first tentative steps towards integration. These initial considerations on integration first focused almost exclusively on learning German because inadequate knowledge of the language represented a major obstacle to communication that had in the meantime become unavoidable. The religious needs of Muslims, however, played no significant role, even though the debates on integration had greatly increased in the meantime.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Islam in Europe\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Islam in Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410-003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

穆斯林在欧洲的存在有一段漫长而矛盾的历史,这段历史因国而异。每个欧洲国家都有自己与伊斯兰相遇的历史,这是由其自身的背景所塑造的。这就是为什么在欧洲各国内部发展了不同的模式和传统来与伊斯兰教互动,这意味着,鉴于个别国家的各种方法和做法,不可能谈论泛欧前景。尽管个别欧洲国家对待伊斯兰教的历史方式不同,但在20世纪60年代和70年代,当越来越多的穆斯林工人被招募时,各国的发展表现出相似之处。在欧洲背景下,关于穆斯林“客工”的一个经常出现的假设是,新到达的人只会在欧洲呆一段有限的时间,然后就会返回他们的祖国。不仅是出于经济原因而雇用这些人的东道国认为情况会是这样,就连出于同样原因而来的外来工自己也这么认为。这就是为什么没有采取任何措施让新工人融入社会。新工人不需要适应社会,政府也没有启动入籍程序。正如后来所强调的那样,这是一个严重的疏忽,因为事情的结果与最初的预期大不相同。外来工人逗留的时间更长,并把他们的家人从本国带过来,这意味着,与他们以前的孤立生活不同,他们在一定程度上由于家人的涌入而被迫积极参与公共生活。这些事态发展揭示了前几年的疏忽。同样清楚的是,以前的外来工人和他们的家庭成员在此期间已成为社会不可分割的一部分。但是,没有一种融合模式可以纠正这些遗漏,使移民更容易融入社会。在此期间,以前的外来工人已经成为当地居民,他们的孩子在当地学校上学,他们的形象逐渐发生了变化,这导致了融合的第一步试探性的步骤。这些关于融合的最初考虑首先几乎完全集中在学习德语上,因为语言知识不足是交流的一个主要障碍,与此同时,这种障碍已经变得不可避免。然而,穆斯林的宗教需要并没有发挥重要作用,尽管与此同时关于融合的辩论大大增加了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Islamic Theology in European Universities
The Muslim presence in Europe has a long and ambivalent history, which differs from country to country. Every European country has its own history of encounter with Islam that is shaped by its own context. That is why different models and traditions have developed within the European countries for interacting with Islam, which means that, given the various approaches and practices in individual countries, it is impossible to speak of a pan-European outlook. Despite the different historically conditioned approaches of individual European countries to Islam, the developments in the 1960s and 1970s, when increased Muslim workers were recruited, showed similarities across borders. An oft-recurring assumption in the European context concerning the Muslim ‘guest worker’ is manifest in the expectation that the new arrivals would only be in Europe for a limited time and would then return to their home countries. Not only did the host countries – which recruited these people for economic reasons – think this would be the case, but the guest workers themselves, who had come for the same reasons, thought so as well. That is why nothing much was done to integrate the new workers into society. The new workers were not expected to adjust to society, nor did the governments initiate the process of naturalisation. As would be emphasised later, it was a serious oversight, for things turned out quite differently than was first expected. The guest workers stayed longer and brought their families over from their native countries, which meant that, in distinction from their previous isolated lives, they were forced to some extent by the influx of their families to actively participate in public life. These developments revealed the omissions of the preceding years. It also became clear that the former guest workers and their family members had in the meantime become an integral part of society. But there were no models for integration that could correct the omissions and make the integration of the migrants into society easier. The gradual change in the profile of the former guest workers, who had in the meantime become residents and whose children attended local schools, led to the first tentative steps towards integration. These initial considerations on integration first focused almost exclusively on learning German because inadequate knowledge of the language represented a major obstacle to communication that had in the meantime become unavoidable. The religious needs of Muslims, however, played no significant role, even though the debates on integration had greatly increased in the meantime.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信