评估模型和设计仿真算法中的性能问题

Roland Ewald, J. Himmelspach, M. Jeschke, Stefan Leye, A. Uhrmacher
{"title":"评估模型和设计仿真算法中的性能问题","authors":"Roland Ewald, J. Himmelspach, M. Jeschke, Stefan Leye, A. Uhrmacher","doi":"10.1109/HIBI.2009.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increase and diversity of simulation methods bears witness of the need for more efficient discrete event simulations in computational biology – but how efficient are those methods, and how to ensure an efficient simulation for a concrete model?As the performance of simulation methods depends on the model, the simulator, and the infrastructure, general answers to those questions are likely to remain illusive; they have to besought individually and experimentally instead. This requires configurable implementations of many algorithms, means to define and conduct meaningful experiments on them, and mechanisms for storing and analyzing observed performance data.In this paper, we first overview basic approaches for improving simulation performance and illustrate the challenges when comparing different methods. We then argue that providing all the aforementioned components in a single tool, in our case the open source modeling and simulation framework JAMES II,reveals many synergies in effectively pursuing both questions.This is exemplified by presenting results of recent studies and introducing a new component to swiftly evaluate simulator code changes against previous experimental data.","PeriodicalId":403061,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Workshop on High Performance Computational Systems Biology","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Issues in Evaluating Models and Designing Simulation Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Roland Ewald, J. Himmelspach, M. Jeschke, Stefan Leye, A. Uhrmacher\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HIBI.2009.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increase and diversity of simulation methods bears witness of the need for more efficient discrete event simulations in computational biology – but how efficient are those methods, and how to ensure an efficient simulation for a concrete model?As the performance of simulation methods depends on the model, the simulator, and the infrastructure, general answers to those questions are likely to remain illusive; they have to besought individually and experimentally instead. This requires configurable implementations of many algorithms, means to define and conduct meaningful experiments on them, and mechanisms for storing and analyzing observed performance data.In this paper, we first overview basic approaches for improving simulation performance and illustrate the challenges when comparing different methods. We then argue that providing all the aforementioned components in a single tool, in our case the open source modeling and simulation framework JAMES II,reveals many synergies in effectively pursuing both questions.This is exemplified by presenting results of recent studies and introducing a new component to swiftly evaluate simulator code changes against previous experimental data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 International Workshop on High Performance Computational Systems Biology\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 International Workshop on High Performance Computational Systems Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HIBI.2009.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Workshop on High Performance Computational Systems Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HIBI.2009.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

模拟方法的增加和多样性见证了计算生物学中对更有效的离散事件模拟的需求-但是这些方法的效率如何,以及如何确保对具体模型的有效模拟?由于仿真方法的性能取决于模型、模拟器和基础设施,这些问题的一般答案可能仍然是虚幻的;他们不得不单独地、实验性地去寻求。这需要许多算法的可配置实现,定义和对它们进行有意义的实验的方法,以及存储和分析观察到的性能数据的机制。在本文中,我们首先概述了提高仿真性能的基本方法,并说明了比较不同方法时面临的挑战。然后,我们认为在一个工具中提供上述所有组件,在我们的例子中是开源建模和仿真框架JAMES II,可以有效地解决这两个问题。通过展示最近的研究结果和引入一个新的组件来根据以前的实验数据快速评估模拟器代码的变化,可以举例说明这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Issues in Evaluating Models and Designing Simulation Algorithms
The increase and diversity of simulation methods bears witness of the need for more efficient discrete event simulations in computational biology – but how efficient are those methods, and how to ensure an efficient simulation for a concrete model?As the performance of simulation methods depends on the model, the simulator, and the infrastructure, general answers to those questions are likely to remain illusive; they have to besought individually and experimentally instead. This requires configurable implementations of many algorithms, means to define and conduct meaningful experiments on them, and mechanisms for storing and analyzing observed performance data.In this paper, we first overview basic approaches for improving simulation performance and illustrate the challenges when comparing different methods. We then argue that providing all the aforementioned components in a single tool, in our case the open source modeling and simulation framework JAMES II,reveals many synergies in effectively pursuing both questions.This is exemplified by presenting results of recent studies and introducing a new component to swiftly evaluate simulator code changes against previous experimental data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信