描述模型质量评估框架

Dominique Ernadote
{"title":"描述模型质量评估框架","authors":"Dominique Ernadote","doi":"10.1109/SYSENG.2018.8544381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous systems engineering projects use descriptive models structured by standard metamodels such as SysML, UML, or NAF. Model-based systems engineering is now so well established in the world of systems engineering that there is no longer questions about the usefulness of such modeling activities. However, it is still difficult to determine what is the current level of quality and how far the models are from the expected project objectives. This paper proposes a framework which reduces the pain of elaborating a quality process aside of the main systems engineering tasks so that a project manager can quickly be aware of the modeling progress statuses. The proposed framework is based on a modeling method which is itself modeled so that to allow a predefined set of modeling artefacts self-learning the quality aspects, and generating the appropriate dashboards at different levels of details.","PeriodicalId":192753,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE)","volume":"2625 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Framework for Descriptive Models Quality Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Dominique Ernadote\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SYSENG.2018.8544381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Numerous systems engineering projects use descriptive models structured by standard metamodels such as SysML, UML, or NAF. Model-based systems engineering is now so well established in the world of systems engineering that there is no longer questions about the usefulness of such modeling activities. However, it is still difficult to determine what is the current level of quality and how far the models are from the expected project objectives. This paper proposes a framework which reduces the pain of elaborating a quality process aside of the main systems engineering tasks so that a project manager can quickly be aware of the modeling progress statuses. The proposed framework is based on a modeling method which is itself modeled so that to allow a predefined set of modeling artefacts self-learning the quality aspects, and generating the appropriate dashboards at different levels of details.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE)\",\"volume\":\"2625 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSENG.2018.8544381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSENG.2018.8544381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

许多系统工程项目使用由标准元模型(如SysML、UML或NAF)构建的描述性模型。基于模型的系统工程现在在系统工程的世界中已经很好地建立起来了,因此不再有关于这种建模活动的有用性的问题。然而,仍然很难确定当前的质量水平是什么,以及模型离预期的项目目标有多远。本文提出了一个框架,该框架减少了在主要系统工程任务之外详细阐述质量过程的痛苦,以便项目经理可以快速了解建模进度状态。所建议的框架基于一种建模方法,该方法本身是建模的,以便允许一组预定义的建模工件自学习质量方面,并在不同的细节级别上生成适当的指示板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Framework for Descriptive Models Quality Assessment
Numerous systems engineering projects use descriptive models structured by standard metamodels such as SysML, UML, or NAF. Model-based systems engineering is now so well established in the world of systems engineering that there is no longer questions about the usefulness of such modeling activities. However, it is still difficult to determine what is the current level of quality and how far the models are from the expected project objectives. This paper proposes a framework which reduces the pain of elaborating a quality process aside of the main systems engineering tasks so that a project manager can quickly be aware of the modeling progress statuses. The proposed framework is based on a modeling method which is itself modeled so that to allow a predefined set of modeling artefacts self-learning the quality aspects, and generating the appropriate dashboards at different levels of details.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信