基金投资组合网络:气候风险视角

Adrien Amzallag
{"title":"基金投资组合网络:气候风险视角","authors":"Adrien Amzallag","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3924326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the European financial sector, investment funds are more exposed to climate-sensitive economic sectors than banks, insurers and pension funds. However, few investment fund climate-related financial risk assessments have been conducted. We attempt to help fill this gap, using a dataset of EUR 8 trillion of European investment fund portfolio holdings. We recover the network of fund portfolio overlaps (interconnections) and augment this with information on the relative environmental performance ('dirtiness') of fund portfolios. Funds whose portfolios are tilted towards more polluting assets (brown funds) distribute their portfolio over a larger number of companies than funds with cleaner portfolios (green funds). This apparent diversification hides a concentration risk: brown funds are more closely connected with each other (have more similar portfolios) than green fund portfolios, which tend to ‘herd’ less (have less similar portfolios to those of other green funds). This suggests that widespread climate-related financial shocks are likely to disproportionately affect brown funds. A climate risk scenario exercise confirms this: within total system-wide losses of EUR 152 billion to EUR 443 billion, most brown funds’ losses range from about 9% to 18% of affected assets, in contrast to green funds’ losses, which usually range from 3% to 8%. In addition, brown funds have more systemic impact: they contribute more to total system-wide losses (by virtue of their greater interconnections within the fund universe) than green funds. These findings provide support for ongoing EU regulatory and supervisory initiatives on sustainable finance.","PeriodicalId":214634,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Climate Change & Energy Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fund portfolio networks: a climate risk perspective\",\"authors\":\"Adrien Amzallag\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3924326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within the European financial sector, investment funds are more exposed to climate-sensitive economic sectors than banks, insurers and pension funds. However, few investment fund climate-related financial risk assessments have been conducted. We attempt to help fill this gap, using a dataset of EUR 8 trillion of European investment fund portfolio holdings. We recover the network of fund portfolio overlaps (interconnections) and augment this with information on the relative environmental performance ('dirtiness') of fund portfolios. Funds whose portfolios are tilted towards more polluting assets (brown funds) distribute their portfolio over a larger number of companies than funds with cleaner portfolios (green funds). This apparent diversification hides a concentration risk: brown funds are more closely connected with each other (have more similar portfolios) than green fund portfolios, which tend to ‘herd’ less (have less similar portfolios to those of other green funds). This suggests that widespread climate-related financial shocks are likely to disproportionately affect brown funds. A climate risk scenario exercise confirms this: within total system-wide losses of EUR 152 billion to EUR 443 billion, most brown funds’ losses range from about 9% to 18% of affected assets, in contrast to green funds’ losses, which usually range from 3% to 8%. In addition, brown funds have more systemic impact: they contribute more to total system-wide losses (by virtue of their greater interconnections within the fund universe) than green funds. These findings provide support for ongoing EU regulatory and supervisory initiatives on sustainable finance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DecisionSciRN: Climate Change & Energy Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DecisionSciRN: Climate Change & Energy Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3924326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Climate Change & Energy Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3924326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在欧洲金融部门,投资基金比银行、保险公司和养老基金更容易接触到气候敏感的经济部门。然而,很少有投资基金进行与气候相关的金融风险评估。我们试图帮助填补这一空白,使用8万亿欧元的欧洲投资基金组合持有的数据集。我们恢复了基金投资组合重叠(互连)的网络,并用基金投资组合的相对环境绩效(“肮脏”)的信息来增强它。投资组合倾向于污染更严重的资产的基金(棕色基金)比投资组合更清洁的基金(绿色基金)将其投资组合分配给更多的公司。这种明显的多样化隐藏了集中风险:棕色基金彼此之间的联系更紧密(拥有更多相似的投资组合),而绿色基金的投资组合往往“羊群”更少(与其他绿色基金的投资组合相似程度更低)。这表明,与气候相关的广泛金融冲击可能对棕色基金产生不成比例的影响。一项气候风险情景演练证实了这一点:在1520亿至4430亿欧元的全系统总损失中,大多数棕色基金的损失约占受影响资产的9%至18%,而绿色基金的损失通常在3%至8%之间。此外,棕色基金具有更大的系统性影响:与绿色基金相比,它们对全系统损失的贡献更大(由于它们在基金领域内的相互联系更大)。这些发现为欧盟正在进行的可持续金融监管举措提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fund portfolio networks: a climate risk perspective
Within the European financial sector, investment funds are more exposed to climate-sensitive economic sectors than banks, insurers and pension funds. However, few investment fund climate-related financial risk assessments have been conducted. We attempt to help fill this gap, using a dataset of EUR 8 trillion of European investment fund portfolio holdings. We recover the network of fund portfolio overlaps (interconnections) and augment this with information on the relative environmental performance ('dirtiness') of fund portfolios. Funds whose portfolios are tilted towards more polluting assets (brown funds) distribute their portfolio over a larger number of companies than funds with cleaner portfolios (green funds). This apparent diversification hides a concentration risk: brown funds are more closely connected with each other (have more similar portfolios) than green fund portfolios, which tend to ‘herd’ less (have less similar portfolios to those of other green funds). This suggests that widespread climate-related financial shocks are likely to disproportionately affect brown funds. A climate risk scenario exercise confirms this: within total system-wide losses of EUR 152 billion to EUR 443 billion, most brown funds’ losses range from about 9% to 18% of affected assets, in contrast to green funds’ losses, which usually range from 3% to 8%. In addition, brown funds have more systemic impact: they contribute more to total system-wide losses (by virtue of their greater interconnections within the fund universe) than green funds. These findings provide support for ongoing EU regulatory and supervisory initiatives on sustainable finance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信