所得税:谁付,多少?

Cletus C. Coughlin
{"title":"所得税:谁付,多少?","authors":"Cletus C. Coughlin","doi":"10.20955/es.2006.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"W ith the tax filing season in full swing, these summary figures may provide some perspective on the issue of who is paying federal individual income taxes and, more importantly, the relative shares paid by different groups of taxpayers. (Note that, because I do not include the impact of other taxes, such as payroll taxes, my discussion does not address the overall tax system.) Federal tax receipts for 2003 totaled $1.7 trillion, with the largest share (43 percent) coming from individual income taxes (IIT). As shown in the table, receipts from IIT totaled $747.9 billion for 2003, the result of 128.6 million filed returns that reported total adjusted gross income (AGI) of $6.3 trillion. Thus, the ratio of taxes to income, known as the total average tax rate, was 11.9 percent. Under taking the same calculation for earlier years, one finds that the average tax rate for 2003 is the lowest rate for 1985-2003. The table also provides data on the income tax burdens of specific groups. By ordering the returns based on AGI from highest to lowest, one can calculate useful income and tax information. Let’s start with the top 50 percent and the bottom 50 percent: The former group accounted for 86 percent of AGI and paid more than 96.5 percent of IIT, while the latter group accounted for 14 percent of AGI and 3.5 percent of IIT. The average tax rate for the top 50 percent was 13.4 percent, while the rate for the bottom 50 percent was 3 percent. Both of these rates for 2003 are at their lowest levels for 19852003. Next, let’s look at groups in the top 50 percent. The top 25 percent accounted for 64.9 percent of AGI and paid 83.9 percent of IIT. Their tax rate was 15.4 percent. Meanwhile, the top 10 percent accounted for 42.4 percent of AGI and paid 65.8 percent of IIT. Their tax rate was 18.5 percent. Comparing the top 25 percent with the top 10 percent, one sees that those with higher incomes pay higher average tax rates. This fact continues to hold as we examine those with even higher income, which is a characteristic of a progressive income tax system (i.e., the income tax rate increases as income increases). The top 5 percent accounted for 31.2 percent of AGI and paid 54.4 percent of IIT. Their tax rate was 20.7 percent. Finally, the top 1 percent accounted for 16.8 percent of AGI and paid 34.3 percent of IIT. Their tax rate was 24.3 percent, roughly eight times the average rate of the bottom 50 percent. The rate of 24.3 percent is approximately twice the average rate for all taxpayers, which is roughly the midpoint of the range of 1.8 to 2.3 based on annual calculations for 1985-2003. Reaching political consensus on a tax system that simultaneously (i) provides desirable incentives to work, save, and invest; (ii) is viewed as fair; (iii) is easy to understand; and (iv) generates sufficient revenues to fund spending decisions has proven to be a major challenge in the United States.1 One place to start the discussion is with some basic facts about the existing income tax system.","PeriodicalId":305484,"journal":{"name":"National Economic Trends","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Income taxes: who pays and how much?\",\"authors\":\"Cletus C. Coughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.20955/es.2006.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"W ith the tax filing season in full swing, these summary figures may provide some perspective on the issue of who is paying federal individual income taxes and, more importantly, the relative shares paid by different groups of taxpayers. (Note that, because I do not include the impact of other taxes, such as payroll taxes, my discussion does not address the overall tax system.) Federal tax receipts for 2003 totaled $1.7 trillion, with the largest share (43 percent) coming from individual income taxes (IIT). As shown in the table, receipts from IIT totaled $747.9 billion for 2003, the result of 128.6 million filed returns that reported total adjusted gross income (AGI) of $6.3 trillion. Thus, the ratio of taxes to income, known as the total average tax rate, was 11.9 percent. Under taking the same calculation for earlier years, one finds that the average tax rate for 2003 is the lowest rate for 1985-2003. The table also provides data on the income tax burdens of specific groups. By ordering the returns based on AGI from highest to lowest, one can calculate useful income and tax information. Let’s start with the top 50 percent and the bottom 50 percent: The former group accounted for 86 percent of AGI and paid more than 96.5 percent of IIT, while the latter group accounted for 14 percent of AGI and 3.5 percent of IIT. The average tax rate for the top 50 percent was 13.4 percent, while the rate for the bottom 50 percent was 3 percent. Both of these rates for 2003 are at their lowest levels for 19852003. Next, let’s look at groups in the top 50 percent. The top 25 percent accounted for 64.9 percent of AGI and paid 83.9 percent of IIT. Their tax rate was 15.4 percent. Meanwhile, the top 10 percent accounted for 42.4 percent of AGI and paid 65.8 percent of IIT. Their tax rate was 18.5 percent. Comparing the top 25 percent with the top 10 percent, one sees that those with higher incomes pay higher average tax rates. This fact continues to hold as we examine those with even higher income, which is a characteristic of a progressive income tax system (i.e., the income tax rate increases as income increases). The top 5 percent accounted for 31.2 percent of AGI and paid 54.4 percent of IIT. Their tax rate was 20.7 percent. Finally, the top 1 percent accounted for 16.8 percent of AGI and paid 34.3 percent of IIT. Their tax rate was 24.3 percent, roughly eight times the average rate of the bottom 50 percent. The rate of 24.3 percent is approximately twice the average rate for all taxpayers, which is roughly the midpoint of the range of 1.8 to 2.3 based on annual calculations for 1985-2003. Reaching political consensus on a tax system that simultaneously (i) provides desirable incentives to work, save, and invest; (ii) is viewed as fair; (iii) is easy to understand; and (iv) generates sufficient revenues to fund spending decisions has proven to be a major challenge in the United States.1 One place to start the discussion is with some basic facts about the existing income tax system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Economic Trends\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Economic Trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20955/es.2006.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Economic Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20955/es.2006.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着报税季节的全面展开,这些汇总数据可能会提供一些关于谁在支付联邦个人所得税的问题的观点,更重要的是,不同纳税人群体支付的相对份额。(请注意,因为我没有考虑其他税种的影响,比如工资税,所以我的讨论没有涉及整个税收系统。)2003年联邦税收收入总计1.7万亿美元,其中最大的份额(43%)来自个人所得税(IIT)。如表所示,2003年来自印度理工学院的收入合共7,479亿元,即1.286亿份已提交的报税表所报告的调整后总收入为6.3万亿元。因此,税收与收入的比率,即总平均税率,为11.9%。对前几年进行同样的计算,人们发现2003年的平均税率是1985-2003年的最低税率。该表还提供了具体群体所得税负担的数据。通过根据AGI将回报从高到低排序,人们可以计算出有用的收入和税收信息。让我们从前50%和后50%开始:前一组占AGI的86%,支付的IIT超过96.5%,而后一组占AGI的14%和IIT的3.5%。收入最高的50%的平均税率为13.4%,而收入最低的50%的平均税率为3%。2003年的这两个比率都处于1985 - 2003年的最低水平。接下来,让我们看看排名前50%的群体。收入最高的25%的人占AGI的64.9%,支付了IIT的83.9%。税率为15.4%。与此同时,收入最高的10%的人占总收益的42.4%,支付了65.8%的个人所得税。税率为18.5%。将收入最高的25%的人与收入最高的10%的人进行比较,人们会发现收入越高的人缴纳的平均税率越高。当我们研究那些收入更高的人时,这一事实继续成立,这是累进所得税制度的一个特征(即,所得税税率随着收入的增加而增加)。收入最高的5%占总收益的31.2%,支付了个人所得税的54.4%。税率为20.7%。最后,收入最高的1%占总收益的16.8%,支付了34.3%的个人所得税。他们的税率为24.3%,大约是底层50%人口平均税率的8倍。24.3%的税率大约是所有纳税人平均税率的两倍,这是根据1985年至2003年每年计算的1.8%至2.3%的中点。就税收制度达成政治共识,同时(i)为工作、储蓄和投资提供理想的激励;(ii)被视为公平;(三)易于理解;(iv)产生足够的收入来为支出决策提供资金,这在美国已被证明是一项重大挑战。1首先要讨论的是有关现行所得税制度的一些基本事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Income taxes: who pays and how much?
W ith the tax filing season in full swing, these summary figures may provide some perspective on the issue of who is paying federal individual income taxes and, more importantly, the relative shares paid by different groups of taxpayers. (Note that, because I do not include the impact of other taxes, such as payroll taxes, my discussion does not address the overall tax system.) Federal tax receipts for 2003 totaled $1.7 trillion, with the largest share (43 percent) coming from individual income taxes (IIT). As shown in the table, receipts from IIT totaled $747.9 billion for 2003, the result of 128.6 million filed returns that reported total adjusted gross income (AGI) of $6.3 trillion. Thus, the ratio of taxes to income, known as the total average tax rate, was 11.9 percent. Under taking the same calculation for earlier years, one finds that the average tax rate for 2003 is the lowest rate for 1985-2003. The table also provides data on the income tax burdens of specific groups. By ordering the returns based on AGI from highest to lowest, one can calculate useful income and tax information. Let’s start with the top 50 percent and the bottom 50 percent: The former group accounted for 86 percent of AGI and paid more than 96.5 percent of IIT, while the latter group accounted for 14 percent of AGI and 3.5 percent of IIT. The average tax rate for the top 50 percent was 13.4 percent, while the rate for the bottom 50 percent was 3 percent. Both of these rates for 2003 are at their lowest levels for 19852003. Next, let’s look at groups in the top 50 percent. The top 25 percent accounted for 64.9 percent of AGI and paid 83.9 percent of IIT. Their tax rate was 15.4 percent. Meanwhile, the top 10 percent accounted for 42.4 percent of AGI and paid 65.8 percent of IIT. Their tax rate was 18.5 percent. Comparing the top 25 percent with the top 10 percent, one sees that those with higher incomes pay higher average tax rates. This fact continues to hold as we examine those with even higher income, which is a characteristic of a progressive income tax system (i.e., the income tax rate increases as income increases). The top 5 percent accounted for 31.2 percent of AGI and paid 54.4 percent of IIT. Their tax rate was 20.7 percent. Finally, the top 1 percent accounted for 16.8 percent of AGI and paid 34.3 percent of IIT. Their tax rate was 24.3 percent, roughly eight times the average rate of the bottom 50 percent. The rate of 24.3 percent is approximately twice the average rate for all taxpayers, which is roughly the midpoint of the range of 1.8 to 2.3 based on annual calculations for 1985-2003. Reaching political consensus on a tax system that simultaneously (i) provides desirable incentives to work, save, and invest; (ii) is viewed as fair; (iii) is easy to understand; and (iv) generates sufficient revenues to fund spending decisions has proven to be a major challenge in the United States.1 One place to start the discussion is with some basic facts about the existing income tax system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信