区域化测度方法的比较分析

Asta Gaigalienė, Otilija Jurakovaitė
{"title":"区域化测度方法的比较分析","authors":"Asta Gaigalienė, Otilija Jurakovaitė","doi":"10.1515/mosr-2021-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Regionalization denotes certain sub-systems, which appear to be present in the apparently globalized world. The research aim is to compare regionalization measurement methods, used in prior research. Results reveal that the most common gravity equations method could be improved by adding weighted network measures in order to capture the complexity of the researched phenomena.","PeriodicalId":177702,"journal":{"name":"Management of Organizations: Systematic Research","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regionalization Measurement Methods’ Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Asta Gaigalienė, Otilija Jurakovaitė\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/mosr-2021-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Regionalization denotes certain sub-systems, which appear to be present in the apparently globalized world. The research aim is to compare regionalization measurement methods, used in prior research. Results reveal that the most common gravity equations method could be improved by adding weighted network measures in order to capture the complexity of the researched phenomena.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management of Organizations: Systematic Research\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management of Organizations: Systematic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/mosr-2021-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management of Organizations: Systematic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mosr-2021-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

区域化是指在明显全球化的世界中出现的某些子系统。研究的目的是比较以往研究中使用的区划测量方法。结果表明,可以通过增加加权网络度量来改进最常用的重力方程方法,以捕捉研究现象的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regionalization Measurement Methods’ Comparative Analysis
Abstract Regionalization denotes certain sub-systems, which appear to be present in the apparently globalized world. The research aim is to compare regionalization measurement methods, used in prior research. Results reveal that the most common gravity equations method could be improved by adding weighted network measures in order to capture the complexity of the researched phenomena.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信