本科课程形成性评价的范式转换:参与式行动研究

S. M. Sari, Iis Inayati, A. Sidiqa
{"title":"本科课程形成性评价的范式转换:参与式行动研究","authors":"S. M. Sari, Iis Inayati, A. Sidiqa","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.210930.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of “assessment for learning” has been widely defined as a form of assessment that facilitates the improvement of students’ learning. However, there’s still limited evidence of real implementation of formative assessment, especially related to the sociocultural issues. This study explored the formative paradigm change in students and lecturers in our context. A participatory action research approach was used in two groups of the undergraduate medical teachers (N=18), and students (N=30). This research contains two cyclical processes of reflection for over 4 months. In between the cycle, we have workshops and continuing discussions about formative assessment. The FGD and in-depth interviews were done to explore the gap between the cycle qualitatively. The results showed the gaps and challenges in changing the paradigm. We identified three themes of paradigm changes : (1) “Formative is the assessment of knowledge” to “the assessment of thinking skills and professionalism”; (2) Feedback “derived in group and one direction explanation” to “individually driven and a dialogic form”; (3) Formative assessment result is “score-minded” to “the improvement of thinking skills and process-minded”. Besides, we found the themes of challenges in these paradigm changes, such as (1) the good practice in “how to” assess and feedback dialog in cultural context; (2) students’ self-reflection skills ; (3) student and teachers’ collaboration. We conclude that there is no simple way to implement the new paradigm of assessment, especially related to the cultural adaptation. We recommend this participatory approach to be a crucial part in the assessment paradigm changes.","PeriodicalId":239200,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)","volume":"331 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Paradigm Change of Formative Assessment in the Undergraduate Curriculum: The Participatory Action Research (PAR)\",\"authors\":\"S. M. Sari, Iis Inayati, A. Sidiqa\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/assehr.k.210930.049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of “assessment for learning” has been widely defined as a form of assessment that facilitates the improvement of students’ learning. However, there’s still limited evidence of real implementation of formative assessment, especially related to the sociocultural issues. This study explored the formative paradigm change in students and lecturers in our context. A participatory action research approach was used in two groups of the undergraduate medical teachers (N=18), and students (N=30). This research contains two cyclical processes of reflection for over 4 months. In between the cycle, we have workshops and continuing discussions about formative assessment. The FGD and in-depth interviews were done to explore the gap between the cycle qualitatively. The results showed the gaps and challenges in changing the paradigm. We identified three themes of paradigm changes : (1) “Formative is the assessment of knowledge” to “the assessment of thinking skills and professionalism”; (2) Feedback “derived in group and one direction explanation” to “individually driven and a dialogic form”; (3) Formative assessment result is “score-minded” to “the improvement of thinking skills and process-minded”. Besides, we found the themes of challenges in these paradigm changes, such as (1) the good practice in “how to” assess and feedback dialog in cultural context; (2) students’ self-reflection skills ; (3) student and teachers’ collaboration. We conclude that there is no simple way to implement the new paradigm of assessment, especially related to the cultural adaptation. We recommend this participatory approach to be a crucial part in the assessment paradigm changes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)\",\"volume\":\"331 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210930.049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210930.049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

“为学习而评估”的概念被广泛定义为一种促进学生学习的评估形式。然而,真正实施形成性评估的证据仍然有限,特别是与社会文化问题相关的证据。本研究探讨了在我们的背景下,学生和教师的形成范式变化。采用参与式行动研究方法对两组医学本科教师(N=18)和学生(N=30)进行调查。这项研究包含两个周期的反思过程,历时4个多月。在这两个周期之间,我们有关于形成性评估的研讨会和持续讨论。进行了FGD和深度访谈,以定性地探讨周期之间的差距。结果表明,在改变范式方面存在差距和挑战。我们确定了范式变化的三个主题:(1)“形成性是对知识的评估”到“思维技能和专业精神的评估”;(2)“群体衍生、单向解释”到“个体驱动、对话形式”的反馈;(3)形成性评价结果由“分数导向型”向“思维能力和过程导向型”转变。此外,我们还发现了这些范式变化的挑战主题,如(1)文化背景下“如何”评估和反馈对话的良好实践;(2)学生的自我反思能力;(3)师生合作。我们的结论是,没有简单的方法来实施新的评估范式,特别是涉及到文化适应。我们建议将这种参与性方法作为评估范式变化的关键部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Paradigm Change of Formative Assessment in the Undergraduate Curriculum: The Participatory Action Research (PAR)
The concept of “assessment for learning” has been widely defined as a form of assessment that facilitates the improvement of students’ learning. However, there’s still limited evidence of real implementation of formative assessment, especially related to the sociocultural issues. This study explored the formative paradigm change in students and lecturers in our context. A participatory action research approach was used in two groups of the undergraduate medical teachers (N=18), and students (N=30). This research contains two cyclical processes of reflection for over 4 months. In between the cycle, we have workshops and continuing discussions about formative assessment. The FGD and in-depth interviews were done to explore the gap between the cycle qualitatively. The results showed the gaps and challenges in changing the paradigm. We identified three themes of paradigm changes : (1) “Formative is the assessment of knowledge” to “the assessment of thinking skills and professionalism”; (2) Feedback “derived in group and one direction explanation” to “individually driven and a dialogic form”; (3) Formative assessment result is “score-minded” to “the improvement of thinking skills and process-minded”. Besides, we found the themes of challenges in these paradigm changes, such as (1) the good practice in “how to” assess and feedback dialog in cultural context; (2) students’ self-reflection skills ; (3) student and teachers’ collaboration. We conclude that there is no simple way to implement the new paradigm of assessment, especially related to the cultural adaptation. We recommend this participatory approach to be a crucial part in the assessment paradigm changes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信