Євгеній Бевзюк
{"title":"ІМПЕРІЯ ЯК ІСТОРИКО-ГЕОПОЛІТИЧНИЙ ФЕНОМЕН","authors":"Євгеній Бевзюк","doi":"10.24144/2078-1431.2019.1(22).45-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been few researches recently in Ukraine investigating empires as a political phenomenon. The beginning of the XX century showed that empires were in the past, yet in the previous century, for the following empires collapsed: British, French, Prussian, Austro-Hungarian, Russian, Ottoman, Japanese. However, the issue of empires is not closed, has not been taken off the political agenda. The notion of empire was not yet investigated in the XIX century, and in the XX the scientists introduced such terms as imperial thinking, imperial ambitions, and imperial traditions. However, the content of the notion \"empire\" was not investigated or had a demonized meaning with a destructive sense. The research and analysis of empires had a serious theoretical significance for the objective perception of history, modernity, and development perspectives of international relations system. Although it must be emphasized that European countries actually claim to form their own organizational type of state. So, recently, quite often, researchers and politicians have expressed different assessments regarding the prospect of the development of forms of state-territorial organization of European countries. What is the future of the European Union? In decentralization and separation of states in the further integration of cultural and economic space? Is it possible for the united Europe to coexist within the confederacy or federal structure? Price issue concerns not only the EU, but also its territorial organization and, most importantly, the future format of the state. In this regard, the question arises: the prospects of the European alliance - the consolidation of the federation, the confederation of countries, and perhaps the future version of the renewed type of \"soft\" empire? We examined the separate principles and aspects of the imperial system. Empires existed in different ages, in different political and cultural environments. All empires were characterized by different models of colonization and space exploration. Different empires perceived their regions with their autochthonous population. However, in many respects the imperial dominant remained similar. This allows us to assume that the ethnic groups can perceive the imperial order at least if it is adapted to its ethno-social and ethnosciological peculiarities, and therefore, in our opinion, it will be incorrect to recall the empire-state only in the past.","PeriodicalId":377422,"journal":{"name":"Геополітика України: історія і сучасність","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Геополітика України: історія і сучасність","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2078-1431.2019.1(22).45-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近在乌克兰很少有研究将帝国作为一种政治现象进行调查。20世纪初表明,帝国已经成为过去,然而在上个世纪,以下帝国崩溃了:英国、法国、普鲁士、奥匈帝国、俄罗斯、奥斯曼帝国、日本。然而,帝国的问题并没有结束,也没有从政治议程上删除。在19世纪,帝国的概念还没有被研究,在20世纪,科学家们引入了诸如帝国思想、帝国野心和帝国传统等术语。然而,“帝国”这个概念的内容并没有被研究,或者被妖魔化了,具有破坏性的意义。对帝国的研究和分析对于客观认识国际关系体系的历史、现代性和发展前景具有重要的理论意义。虽然必须强调的是,欧洲国家实际上主张形成自己的国家组织类型。因此,最近,研究人员和政治家经常对欧洲国家国家-领土组织形式发展的前景表达不同的评估。欧盟的未来是什么?在分权和国家分离中进一步整合文化和经济空间?统一的欧洲有可能在邦联或联邦结构中共存吗?价格问题不仅关系到欧盟,也关系到欧盟的领土组织,最重要的是关系到欧盟未来的国家形态。在这方面,问题出现了:欧洲联盟的前景-联邦的巩固,国家联盟,也许是未来版本的新型“软”帝国?我们考察了帝制的不同原则和方面。帝国存在于不同的时代,不同的政治和文化环境中。所有帝国的特点都是不同的殖民和太空探索模式。不同的帝国用他们的本土人口来看待他们的地区。然而,在许多方面,帝国统治仍然相似。这使我们可以假设,如果帝国秩序适应其民族社会和民族人类学的特点,那么民族群体至少可以感知帝国秩序,因此,在我们看来,仅仅回忆过去的帝国国家是不正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ІМПЕРІЯ ЯК ІСТОРИКО-ГЕОПОЛІТИЧНИЙ ФЕНОМЕН
There have been few researches recently in Ukraine investigating empires as a political phenomenon. The beginning of the XX century showed that empires were in the past, yet in the previous century, for the following empires collapsed: British, French, Prussian, Austro-Hungarian, Russian, Ottoman, Japanese. However, the issue of empires is not closed, has not been taken off the political agenda. The notion of empire was not yet investigated in the XIX century, and in the XX the scientists introduced such terms as imperial thinking, imperial ambitions, and imperial traditions. However, the content of the notion "empire" was not investigated or had a demonized meaning with a destructive sense. The research and analysis of empires had a serious theoretical significance for the objective perception of history, modernity, and development perspectives of international relations system. Although it must be emphasized that European countries actually claim to form their own organizational type of state. So, recently, quite often, researchers and politicians have expressed different assessments regarding the prospect of the development of forms of state-territorial organization of European countries. What is the future of the European Union? In decentralization and separation of states in the further integration of cultural and economic space? Is it possible for the united Europe to coexist within the confederacy or federal structure? Price issue concerns not only the EU, but also its territorial organization and, most importantly, the future format of the state. In this regard, the question arises: the prospects of the European alliance - the consolidation of the federation, the confederation of countries, and perhaps the future version of the renewed type of "soft" empire? We examined the separate principles and aspects of the imperial system. Empires existed in different ages, in different political and cultural environments. All empires were characterized by different models of colonization and space exploration. Different empires perceived their regions with their autochthonous population. However, in many respects the imperial dominant remained similar. This allows us to assume that the ethnic groups can perceive the imperial order at least if it is adapted to its ethno-social and ethnosciological peculiarities, and therefore, in our opinion, it will be incorrect to recall the empire-state only in the past.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信