在监控时代,国际人权法在保护网络隐私方面的作用

Elizabeth Watt
{"title":"在监控时代,国际人权法在保护网络隐私方面的作用","authors":"Elizabeth Watt","doi":"10.23919/CYCON.2017.8240330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whilst the political dust on mass surveillance is slowly settling down, what has become apparent is the uncertainty regarding the interpretation and application of the right to privacy norms under Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 in the context of cyberspace. Despite the world-wide condemnation of these practices by, inter alia, the United Nations and international human rights organisations, little consensus has been reached on how to bring them in line with international human rights law. This paper proposes that the most pragmatic solution is updating Article 17 by replacing General Comment No.16. There are many issues that require attention. The paper focuses on two fundamental aspects of this process, namely the development of more detailed understanding of what is meant by the right to privacy in the 21st century, and the challenge posed by foreign cyber surveillance to the principle of extraterritorial application of human rights treaties. To that end, the paper identifies that the ‘effective control’ test, developed by international human rights courts and bodies adopted to determine jurisdiction, is unsuitable in the context of state-sponsored cyber surveillance. The paper considers a number of suggestions made by legal scholars, which hinge on the control of communications, rather than the physical control over areas or individuals. Such a ‘virtual control’ approach seems in line with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, according to which extraterritorial obligations may arise when states exercise authority and control over an individual's human rights, despite not having physical control over that individual. The paper argues that the ‘virtual control’ test, understood as a remote control over the individual's right to privacy of communications, may help to close the normative gap that state intelligence agencies keenly exploit at the moment.","PeriodicalId":423770,"journal":{"name":"2017 9th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon)","volume":"383 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of international human rights law in the protection of online privacy in the age of surveillance\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Watt\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/CYCON.2017.8240330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whilst the political dust on mass surveillance is slowly settling down, what has become apparent is the uncertainty regarding the interpretation and application of the right to privacy norms under Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 in the context of cyberspace. Despite the world-wide condemnation of these practices by, inter alia, the United Nations and international human rights organisations, little consensus has been reached on how to bring them in line with international human rights law. This paper proposes that the most pragmatic solution is updating Article 17 by replacing General Comment No.16. There are many issues that require attention. The paper focuses on two fundamental aspects of this process, namely the development of more detailed understanding of what is meant by the right to privacy in the 21st century, and the challenge posed by foreign cyber surveillance to the principle of extraterritorial application of human rights treaties. To that end, the paper identifies that the ‘effective control’ test, developed by international human rights courts and bodies adopted to determine jurisdiction, is unsuitable in the context of state-sponsored cyber surveillance. The paper considers a number of suggestions made by legal scholars, which hinge on the control of communications, rather than the physical control over areas or individuals. Such a ‘virtual control’ approach seems in line with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, according to which extraterritorial obligations may arise when states exercise authority and control over an individual's human rights, despite not having physical control over that individual. The paper argues that the ‘virtual control’ test, understood as a remote control over the individual's right to privacy of communications, may help to close the normative gap that state intelligence agencies keenly exploit at the moment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 9th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon)\",\"volume\":\"383 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 9th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/CYCON.2017.8240330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 9th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/CYCON.2017.8240330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

虽然大规模监控的政治尘埃正在慢慢尘埃落定,但显而易见的是,在网络空间背景下,《1966年公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第17条所规定的隐私权规范的解释和适用存在不确定性。尽管联合国和国际人权组织在世界范围内谴责这些做法,但在如何使其符合国际人权法方面几乎没有达成共识。本文建议,最务实的解决办法是更新第17条,取代第16号一般性意见。有许多问题需要注意。本文关注这一过程的两个基本方面,即对21世纪隐私权含义的更详细理解的发展,以及外国网络监控对人权条约的域外适用原则构成的挑战。为此,该论文指出,由国际人权法院和机构开发的用于确定管辖权的“有效控制”测试不适用于国家支持的网络监视。本文考虑了法律学者提出的一些建议,这些建议取决于对通信的控制,而不是对地区或个人的物理控制。这种“虚拟控制”方法似乎符合欧洲人权法院的判例,根据该判例,当国家对个人的人权行使权力和控制时,尽管对该人没有实际控制,但可能会产生域外义务。论文认为,“虚拟控制”测试,被理解为对个人通信隐私权的远程控制,可能有助于缩小国家情报机构目前热衷利用的规范差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of international human rights law in the protection of online privacy in the age of surveillance
Whilst the political dust on mass surveillance is slowly settling down, what has become apparent is the uncertainty regarding the interpretation and application of the right to privacy norms under Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 in the context of cyberspace. Despite the world-wide condemnation of these practices by, inter alia, the United Nations and international human rights organisations, little consensus has been reached on how to bring them in line with international human rights law. This paper proposes that the most pragmatic solution is updating Article 17 by replacing General Comment No.16. There are many issues that require attention. The paper focuses on two fundamental aspects of this process, namely the development of more detailed understanding of what is meant by the right to privacy in the 21st century, and the challenge posed by foreign cyber surveillance to the principle of extraterritorial application of human rights treaties. To that end, the paper identifies that the ‘effective control’ test, developed by international human rights courts and bodies adopted to determine jurisdiction, is unsuitable in the context of state-sponsored cyber surveillance. The paper considers a number of suggestions made by legal scholars, which hinge on the control of communications, rather than the physical control over areas or individuals. Such a ‘virtual control’ approach seems in line with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, according to which extraterritorial obligations may arise when states exercise authority and control over an individual's human rights, despite not having physical control over that individual. The paper argues that the ‘virtual control’ test, understood as a remote control over the individual's right to privacy of communications, may help to close the normative gap that state intelligence agencies keenly exploit at the moment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信