SAC-Bi与SnPb的跌落冲击性能比较

P. Vyas, M. Belhadi, Xin Wei, Ehab Hamasha, Abdallah Alakayleh, Arvind Srinivasan, Raj Kiran Akula, S. Hamasha, J. Suhling, P. Lall
{"title":"SAC-Bi与SnPb的跌落冲击性能比较","authors":"P. Vyas, M. Belhadi, Xin Wei, Ehab Hamasha, Abdallah Alakayleh, Arvind Srinivasan, Raj Kiran Akula, S. Hamasha, J. Suhling, P. Lall","doi":"10.1109/iTherm54085.2022.9899679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lead free soldering has become mainstream since the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive. Solders have come a long way from the traditional SnPb (Tin-Lead) to lead-free alloys doped with elements such as Bismuth (Bi), Antimony (Sb), Nickel (Ni), etc. Following the transition from ductile lead-based alloys to strong but brittle lead-free solder alloys, the board-level drop test has become a vital reliability evaluation criterion for electronic packages. In this paper, a drop shock reliability comparison was made between SAC305, SAC-Bi, and SnPb. The tested component was a 0.8mm pitch, 15mm body CABGA208. The test vehicle has an Organic Surface Protection (OSP) surface finish and a matching solder sphere with paste alloys. Ten test boards were subjected to drop test, with a peak acceleration of 1500G and 0.5ms pulse duration per JEDEC drop test condition B. After the drop test, a Weibull analysis was performed to study the drop shock reliability for each alloy. Microstructure analysis was also performed to determine the failure mode and the failure location on the board. It was observed that SAC-3.3Bi has the highest drop shock reliability among all the alloys, followed by SAC305, while Sn63Pb37 had the lowest drop shock reliability.","PeriodicalId":351706,"journal":{"name":"2022 21st IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (iTherm)","volume":"33 7-8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drop Shock Performance of SAC-Bi Compared to SnPb\",\"authors\":\"P. Vyas, M. Belhadi, Xin Wei, Ehab Hamasha, Abdallah Alakayleh, Arvind Srinivasan, Raj Kiran Akula, S. Hamasha, J. Suhling, P. Lall\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/iTherm54085.2022.9899679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lead free soldering has become mainstream since the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive. Solders have come a long way from the traditional SnPb (Tin-Lead) to lead-free alloys doped with elements such as Bismuth (Bi), Antimony (Sb), Nickel (Ni), etc. Following the transition from ductile lead-based alloys to strong but brittle lead-free solder alloys, the board-level drop test has become a vital reliability evaluation criterion for electronic packages. In this paper, a drop shock reliability comparison was made between SAC305, SAC-Bi, and SnPb. The tested component was a 0.8mm pitch, 15mm body CABGA208. The test vehicle has an Organic Surface Protection (OSP) surface finish and a matching solder sphere with paste alloys. Ten test boards were subjected to drop test, with a peak acceleration of 1500G and 0.5ms pulse duration per JEDEC drop test condition B. After the drop test, a Weibull analysis was performed to study the drop shock reliability for each alloy. Microstructure analysis was also performed to determine the failure mode and the failure location on the board. It was observed that SAC-3.3Bi has the highest drop shock reliability among all the alloys, followed by SAC305, while Sn63Pb37 had the lowest drop shock reliability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":351706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 21st IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (iTherm)\",\"volume\":\"33 7-8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 21st IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (iTherm)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/iTherm54085.2022.9899679\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 21st IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (iTherm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iTherm54085.2022.9899679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

自有害物质限制(RoHS)指令以来,无铅焊接已成为主流。焊料已经从传统的SnPb(锡铅)发展到添加铋(Bi)、锑(Sb)、镍(Ni)等元素的无铅合金。随着铅基合金从延展性向强而脆的无铅钎料合金过渡,板级跌落试验已成为电子封装可靠性评估的重要标准。本文对SAC305、SAC-Bi和SnPb的跌落冲击可靠性进行了比较。测试组件为0.8mm节距,15mm本体CABGA208。测试车辆具有有机表面保护(OSP)表面处理和与膏体合金相匹配的焊接球。对10块试验板进行跌落试验,在JEDEC跌落试验条件b下,峰值加速度为1500G,脉冲持续时间为0.5ms。跌落试验结束后,对各合金的跌落冲击可靠性进行Weibull分析。通过微观结构分析,确定了故障模式和故障位置。结果表明,SAC-3.3Bi合金的跌落冲击可靠性最高,SAC305次之,Sn63Pb37合金的跌落冲击可靠性最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drop Shock Performance of SAC-Bi Compared to SnPb
Lead free soldering has become mainstream since the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive. Solders have come a long way from the traditional SnPb (Tin-Lead) to lead-free alloys doped with elements such as Bismuth (Bi), Antimony (Sb), Nickel (Ni), etc. Following the transition from ductile lead-based alloys to strong but brittle lead-free solder alloys, the board-level drop test has become a vital reliability evaluation criterion for electronic packages. In this paper, a drop shock reliability comparison was made between SAC305, SAC-Bi, and SnPb. The tested component was a 0.8mm pitch, 15mm body CABGA208. The test vehicle has an Organic Surface Protection (OSP) surface finish and a matching solder sphere with paste alloys. Ten test boards were subjected to drop test, with a peak acceleration of 1500G and 0.5ms pulse duration per JEDEC drop test condition B. After the drop test, a Weibull analysis was performed to study the drop shock reliability for each alloy. Microstructure analysis was also performed to determine the failure mode and the failure location on the board. It was observed that SAC-3.3Bi has the highest drop shock reliability among all the alloys, followed by SAC305, while Sn63Pb37 had the lowest drop shock reliability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信