Intifada Atin Nisya
{"title":"PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ATAS PENYALAHGUNAAN PEMBAYARAN BEA PEROLEHAN HAK ATAS TANAH DAN BANGUNAN (BPHTB) OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH (PPAT)","authors":"Intifada Atin Nisya","doi":"10.31090/HUKUMBISNIS.V3I1.835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This journal is entitled as Criminal Liability for Misappropriation Payments for the Acquisition of Land and Building Rights (BPHTB) by Official Certifier of Title Deeds (PPAT). Normative juridical legal research was applied in this study. The approach used in this problem is the legal approach (statute approach), case approach (case approach), and conceptual approach (conceptual approach). \n            The background study of this thesis is about the problem for the notary as the Official Certifier of Title Deeds / Land Deed Official (PPAT) who is involved in a criminal act. There are several cases of tax evasion and also fictitious tax invoices. One of the cases in this case is the PPAT in Semarang, which ended is subject to criminal acts of Corruption. It was proved by the tax payment money when he should have paid the tax but not paid and she did some data manipulation to enrich himself. In order to establish an action as a violation against the law, the loss of state finances or just against the law has an item belonging to another person in his power, where the goods are not from the proceeds of crime. Based on this background, there are two main issues, namely How does the Ratio Decide in court decisions related to cases of misuse of BPHTB payments made by PPAT and What is the validity of the sale and purchase deed if BPHTB tax invoice and PPh (final) falsified?","PeriodicalId":134994,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31090/HUKUMBISNIS.V3I1.835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本期刊的题目是《由官方业权证明书(PPAT)取得土地和建筑权利(BPHTB)的挪用款项的刑事责任》。本研究采用规范的法律研究方法。在这个问题中使用的方法是法律方法(成文法方法),案例方法(案例方法)和概念方法(概念方法)。本文的背景研究是关于公证员作为业契/地契官员(PPAT)的官方证明人在涉及犯罪行为时所面临的问题。有几起偷税漏税和伪造税务发票的案件。此案中的一个案例是三宝垄的PPAT,它最终受到腐败犯罪行为的影响。当他应该纳税却没有缴纳税款时,她做了一些数据操纵来中饱私囊。为了将一项行为确立为违法行为,国家财政损失或仅仅是违法行为将属于他人的物品掌握在其手中,而该物品并非来自犯罪所得。基于此背景,有两个主要问题,即PPAT滥用BPHTB付款案件的法院判决如何决定比例,以及如果BPHTB税务发票和PPh(最终)伪造,买卖契约的有效性如何?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ATAS PENYALAHGUNAAN PEMBAYARAN BEA PEROLEHAN HAK ATAS TANAH DAN BANGUNAN (BPHTB) OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH (PPAT)
This journal is entitled as Criminal Liability for Misappropriation Payments for the Acquisition of Land and Building Rights (BPHTB) by Official Certifier of Title Deeds (PPAT). Normative juridical legal research was applied in this study. The approach used in this problem is the legal approach (statute approach), case approach (case approach), and conceptual approach (conceptual approach).             The background study of this thesis is about the problem for the notary as the Official Certifier of Title Deeds / Land Deed Official (PPAT) who is involved in a criminal act. There are several cases of tax evasion and also fictitious tax invoices. One of the cases in this case is the PPAT in Semarang, which ended is subject to criminal acts of Corruption. It was proved by the tax payment money when he should have paid the tax but not paid and she did some data manipulation to enrich himself. In order to establish an action as a violation against the law, the loss of state finances or just against the law has an item belonging to another person in his power, where the goods are not from the proceeds of crime. Based on this background, there are two main issues, namely How does the Ratio Decide in court decisions related to cases of misuse of BPHTB payments made by PPAT and What is the validity of the sale and purchase deed if BPHTB tax invoice and PPh (final) falsified?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信