法医和分析工具的研究

S. Raghavan, S. Raghavan
{"title":"法医和分析工具的研究","authors":"S. Raghavan, S. Raghavan","doi":"10.1109/SADFE.2013.6911540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are a wide range of forensic and analysis tools to examine digital evidence in existence today. Traditional tool design examines each source of digital evidence as a BLOB (binary large object) and it is up to the examiner to identify the relevant items from evidence. In the face of rapid technological advancements we are increasingly confronted with a diverse set of digital evidence and being able to identify a particular tool for conducting a specific analysis is an essential task. In this paper, we present a systematic study of contemporary forensic and analysis tools using a hypothesis based review to identify the different functionalities supported by these tools. We highlight the limitations of the forensic tools in regards to evidence corroboration and develop a case for building evidence correlation functionalities into these tools.","PeriodicalId":287131,"journal":{"name":"2013 8th International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensics Engineering (SADFE)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of forensic & analysis tools\",\"authors\":\"S. Raghavan, S. Raghavan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SADFE.2013.6911540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are a wide range of forensic and analysis tools to examine digital evidence in existence today. Traditional tool design examines each source of digital evidence as a BLOB (binary large object) and it is up to the examiner to identify the relevant items from evidence. In the face of rapid technological advancements we are increasingly confronted with a diverse set of digital evidence and being able to identify a particular tool for conducting a specific analysis is an essential task. In this paper, we present a systematic study of contemporary forensic and analysis tools using a hypothesis based review to identify the different functionalities supported by these tools. We highlight the limitations of the forensic tools in regards to evidence corroboration and develop a case for building evidence correlation functionalities into these tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 8th International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensics Engineering (SADFE)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 8th International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensics Engineering (SADFE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SADFE.2013.6911540\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 8th International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensics Engineering (SADFE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SADFE.2013.6911540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

目前有各种各样的法医和分析工具来检查现有的数字证据。传统的工具设计将每个数字证据来源作为一个BLOB(二进制大对象)进行检查,并由审查员从证据中识别相关项目。面对快速的技术进步,我们越来越多地面对各种各样的数字证据,能够确定一种特定的工具来进行特定的分析是一项必不可少的任务。在本文中,我们提出了当代法医和分析工具的系统研究,使用基于假设的审查,以确定这些工具支持的不同功能。我们强调了法医工具在证据确证方面的局限性,并开发了一个在这些工具中建立证据关联功能的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study of forensic & analysis tools
There are a wide range of forensic and analysis tools to examine digital evidence in existence today. Traditional tool design examines each source of digital evidence as a BLOB (binary large object) and it is up to the examiner to identify the relevant items from evidence. In the face of rapid technological advancements we are increasingly confronted with a diverse set of digital evidence and being able to identify a particular tool for conducting a specific analysis is an essential task. In this paper, we present a systematic study of contemporary forensic and analysis tools using a hypothesis based review to identify the different functionalities supported by these tools. We highlight the limitations of the forensic tools in regards to evidence corroboration and develop a case for building evidence correlation functionalities into these tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信