Asaf Adi, O. Etzion, Dagan Gilat, Royi Ronen, G. Sharon, Inna Skarbovsky
{"title":"响应式规则从动态依赖模型推断","authors":"Asaf Adi, O. Etzion, Dagan Gilat, Royi Ronen, G. Sharon, Inna Skarbovsky","doi":"10.1145/1013367.1013411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defining dependency models is sometimes an easier, more intuitive way for ontology representation than defining reactive rules directly, as it provides a higher level of abstraction. We will shortly introduce the ADI (Active Dependency Integration) model capabilities, emphasizing new developments: 1. Support of automatic dependencies instantiation from an abstract definition that expresses a general dependency in the ontology, namely a \"template\". 2. Inference of rules for dynamic dependency models where dependencies and entities may be inserted deleted and updated. We use the eTrade example in order to exemplify those capabilities.","PeriodicalId":409891,"journal":{"name":"WWW Alt. '04","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reactive rules inference from dynamic dependency models\",\"authors\":\"Asaf Adi, O. Etzion, Dagan Gilat, Royi Ronen, G. Sharon, Inna Skarbovsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1013367.1013411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Defining dependency models is sometimes an easier, more intuitive way for ontology representation than defining reactive rules directly, as it provides a higher level of abstraction. We will shortly introduce the ADI (Active Dependency Integration) model capabilities, emphasizing new developments: 1. Support of automatic dependencies instantiation from an abstract definition that expresses a general dependency in the ontology, namely a \\\"template\\\". 2. Inference of rules for dynamic dependency models where dependencies and entities may be inserted deleted and updated. We use the eTrade example in order to exemplify those capabilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WWW Alt. '04\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WWW Alt. '04\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1013367.1013411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WWW Alt. '04","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1013367.1013411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reactive rules inference from dynamic dependency models
Defining dependency models is sometimes an easier, more intuitive way for ontology representation than defining reactive rules directly, as it provides a higher level of abstraction. We will shortly introduce the ADI (Active Dependency Integration) model capabilities, emphasizing new developments: 1. Support of automatic dependencies instantiation from an abstract definition that expresses a general dependency in the ontology, namely a "template". 2. Inference of rules for dynamic dependency models where dependencies and entities may be inserted deleted and updated. We use the eTrade example in order to exemplify those capabilities.