动态精神病学的兴衰

A. Horwitz
{"title":"动态精神病学的兴衰","authors":"A. Horwitz","doi":"10.1093/med/9780190907860.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After psychiatry’s ascendancy during the two decades after World War II ended, the profession entered its most troubled period. From the emergence of the anti-psychiatry movement in the mid-1960s through the resurrection of a biomedical model in the DSM-III in 1980, the field endured a time of continual crisis. The general culture shed its earlier infatuation with analytic ideas and turned sharply against the discipline. The medical profession, biologically oriented psychiatrists, and third-party insurers, too, came to reject psychodynamic approaches. The National Institute of Mental Health as well discarded its initial psychosocial emphasis in favor of a strong biological focus. Another government agency, the Food and Drug Administration, forced drug companies to stop advertising their products as remedies for general distress and mandated that they show efficacy in treating specific diseases. The high pedestal that dynamic psychiatry rested on in the postwar period swiftly crumbled.","PeriodicalId":434335,"journal":{"name":"Between Sanity and Madness","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Decline and Fall of Dynamic Psychiatry\",\"authors\":\"A. Horwitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780190907860.003.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After psychiatry’s ascendancy during the two decades after World War II ended, the profession entered its most troubled period. From the emergence of the anti-psychiatry movement in the mid-1960s through the resurrection of a biomedical model in the DSM-III in 1980, the field endured a time of continual crisis. The general culture shed its earlier infatuation with analytic ideas and turned sharply against the discipline. The medical profession, biologically oriented psychiatrists, and third-party insurers, too, came to reject psychodynamic approaches. The National Institute of Mental Health as well discarded its initial psychosocial emphasis in favor of a strong biological focus. Another government agency, the Food and Drug Administration, forced drug companies to stop advertising their products as remedies for general distress and mandated that they show efficacy in treating specific diseases. The high pedestal that dynamic psychiatry rested on in the postwar period swiftly crumbled.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Between Sanity and Madness\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Between Sanity and Madness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190907860.003.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Between Sanity and Madness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190907860.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在第二次世界大战结束后的20年里,精神病学占据了主导地位,这一职业进入了最困难的时期。从20世纪60年代中期反精神病学运动的出现到1980年DSM-III中生物医学模型的复活,该领域经历了一段持续的危机时期。一般文化摆脱了早先对分析思想的迷恋,转而尖锐地反对这门学科。医学界、以生物学为导向的精神病学家和第三方保险公司也开始拒绝心理动力学方法。美国国家心理健康研究所也放弃了最初的社会心理重点,转而关注生物学。另一个政府机构,食品和药物管理局,迫使制药公司停止宣传他们的产品是对一般痛苦的补救措施,并强制要求他们在治疗特定疾病方面表现出疗效。战后充满活力的精神病学所依赖的崇高地位迅速崩溃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Decline and Fall of Dynamic Psychiatry
After psychiatry’s ascendancy during the two decades after World War II ended, the profession entered its most troubled period. From the emergence of the anti-psychiatry movement in the mid-1960s through the resurrection of a biomedical model in the DSM-III in 1980, the field endured a time of continual crisis. The general culture shed its earlier infatuation with analytic ideas and turned sharply against the discipline. The medical profession, biologically oriented psychiatrists, and third-party insurers, too, came to reject psychodynamic approaches. The National Institute of Mental Health as well discarded its initial psychosocial emphasis in favor of a strong biological focus. Another government agency, the Food and Drug Administration, forced drug companies to stop advertising their products as remedies for general distress and mandated that they show efficacy in treating specific diseases. The high pedestal that dynamic psychiatry rested on in the postwar period swiftly crumbled.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信