可分离微电网成网策略的性能比较分析

A.J.G. Abrantes-Ferreira, A. Lima
{"title":"可分离微电网成网策略的性能比较分析","authors":"A.J.G. Abrantes-Ferreira, A. Lima","doi":"10.1109/COBEP53665.2021.9684127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the scenario of growing penetration of Distributed Generation (DG) units, grid-forming (GFM) strategies are emerging as important candidates to become key players in future low inertia grids. These methods are either based on emulation of synchronous machines at different levels of abstraction or based on the behavior of nonlinear oscillators, the so-called dispatchable Virtual Oscillator Control (dVOC). However, it is not clear which are the strengths and weaknesses of each GFM technique in a general comparative scenario of operation in systemic operation. In this work, part of this question were addressed, where firstly a novel Linear-Droop dVOC-based strategy is proposed and qualitatively compared to another dVOC-based strategy and to Conventional Doop Control in a application scenario of a disconnectable low-voltage microgrid with the aim of evaluating the transient and steady state performance in scenarios of (dis)connenction of loads in both grid-connected and islanded operating modes through time-domain simulations via PSIM™. dVOC-based methods presented overall superior transient performance compared to Droop Control, reaching settling times 8x faster for islanded-mode operation and 4x faster for grid-connected operation. Furthermore, for operation with higher X/R ratio dVOC-based methods presented overall superior transient and steady-state performance compared to Droop Control. On the other hand, the results showed that dVOC-based methods regulates inverter output voltage and frequency based on droop relationships of internal oscillator model quantities, making unclear what is the behavior of quantities at the output of the inverter, which may degrade effectiveness of active and reactive power sharing between GFM units.","PeriodicalId":442384,"journal":{"name":"2021 Brazilian Power Electronics Conference (COBEP)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Performance Analysis of Grid-Forming Strategies Applied to Disconnectable Microgrids\",\"authors\":\"A.J.G. Abrantes-Ferreira, A. Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COBEP53665.2021.9684127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the scenario of growing penetration of Distributed Generation (DG) units, grid-forming (GFM) strategies are emerging as important candidates to become key players in future low inertia grids. These methods are either based on emulation of synchronous machines at different levels of abstraction or based on the behavior of nonlinear oscillators, the so-called dispatchable Virtual Oscillator Control (dVOC). However, it is not clear which are the strengths and weaknesses of each GFM technique in a general comparative scenario of operation in systemic operation. In this work, part of this question were addressed, where firstly a novel Linear-Droop dVOC-based strategy is proposed and qualitatively compared to another dVOC-based strategy and to Conventional Doop Control in a application scenario of a disconnectable low-voltage microgrid with the aim of evaluating the transient and steady state performance in scenarios of (dis)connenction of loads in both grid-connected and islanded operating modes through time-domain simulations via PSIM™. dVOC-based methods presented overall superior transient performance compared to Droop Control, reaching settling times 8x faster for islanded-mode operation and 4x faster for grid-connected operation. Furthermore, for operation with higher X/R ratio dVOC-based methods presented overall superior transient and steady-state performance compared to Droop Control. On the other hand, the results showed that dVOC-based methods regulates inverter output voltage and frequency based on droop relationships of internal oscillator model quantities, making unclear what is the behavior of quantities at the output of the inverter, which may degrade effectiveness of active and reactive power sharing between GFM units.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Brazilian Power Electronics Conference (COBEP)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Brazilian Power Electronics Conference (COBEP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COBEP53665.2021.9684127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Brazilian Power Electronics Conference (COBEP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COBEP53665.2021.9684127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在分布式发电(DG)装置日益普及的情况下,电网形成(GFM)策略正在成为未来低惯性电网的关键参与者。这些方法要么基于不同抽象层次的同步机仿真,要么基于非线性振荡器的行为,即所谓的可调度虚拟振荡器控制(dVOC)。然而,在系统操作的一般比较情况下,每种GFM技术的优缺点尚不清楚。在这项工作中,解决了这个问题的一部分,首先提出了一种新颖的基于线性下垂的dvoc策略,并在可断开的低压微电网的应用场景中定性地与另一种基于dvoc的策略和传统的控制进行了比较,目的是通过PSIM™的时域模拟来评估并网和孤岛运行模式下负载(断开)连接场景下的瞬态和稳态性能。与下垂控制相比,基于dvoc的方法总体上具有优越的瞬态性能,孤岛模式运行的沉降时间快8倍,并网运行的沉降时间快4倍。此外,对于更高X/R比的操作,与下垂控制相比,基于dvoc的方法总体上具有更优越的瞬态和稳态性能。另一方面,研究结果表明,基于dvoc的方法基于内部振荡器模型量的下垂关系调节逆变器输出电压和频率,使得逆变器输出量的行为不明确,这可能会降低GFM单元之间有功和无功共享的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Performance Analysis of Grid-Forming Strategies Applied to Disconnectable Microgrids
In the scenario of growing penetration of Distributed Generation (DG) units, grid-forming (GFM) strategies are emerging as important candidates to become key players in future low inertia grids. These methods are either based on emulation of synchronous machines at different levels of abstraction or based on the behavior of nonlinear oscillators, the so-called dispatchable Virtual Oscillator Control (dVOC). However, it is not clear which are the strengths and weaknesses of each GFM technique in a general comparative scenario of operation in systemic operation. In this work, part of this question were addressed, where firstly a novel Linear-Droop dVOC-based strategy is proposed and qualitatively compared to another dVOC-based strategy and to Conventional Doop Control in a application scenario of a disconnectable low-voltage microgrid with the aim of evaluating the transient and steady state performance in scenarios of (dis)connenction of loads in both grid-connected and islanded operating modes through time-domain simulations via PSIM™. dVOC-based methods presented overall superior transient performance compared to Droop Control, reaching settling times 8x faster for islanded-mode operation and 4x faster for grid-connected operation. Furthermore, for operation with higher X/R ratio dVOC-based methods presented overall superior transient and steady-state performance compared to Droop Control. On the other hand, the results showed that dVOC-based methods regulates inverter output voltage and frequency based on droop relationships of internal oscillator model quantities, making unclear what is the behavior of quantities at the output of the inverter, which may degrade effectiveness of active and reactive power sharing between GFM units.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信