美国人获得医疗服务不公平的病理

Allison K. Hoffman, M. Hall
{"title":"美国人获得医疗服务不公平的病理","authors":"Allison K. Hoffman, M. Hall","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190846756.013.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter maps out the complex picture of access to medical care in the United States. It reflects on how variable access illustrates an American ambivalence about health solidarity. The chapter first considers healthcare financing as one critical element that defines access to medical care and describes the multifaceted US healthcare financing structure, predominated by public insurance programs for select populations and regulated private insurance for others. Next, this chapter describes how access is equally shaped by legal requirements that create treatment obligations for doctors or hospitals regardless of how someone pays for care. There is no constitutional right to health in the United States, but various layers of statutory and common law have created some guarantees. That said, despite efforts to increase access over the past decades, the United States is still extraordinary, as compared to peer nations, on the unevenness of access to medical care among its population.","PeriodicalId":173189,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Health Law","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The American Pathology of Inequitable Access to Medical Care\",\"authors\":\"Allison K. Hoffman, M. Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190846756.013.55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter maps out the complex picture of access to medical care in the United States. It reflects on how variable access illustrates an American ambivalence about health solidarity. The chapter first considers healthcare financing as one critical element that defines access to medical care and describes the multifaceted US healthcare financing structure, predominated by public insurance programs for select populations and regulated private insurance for others. Next, this chapter describes how access is equally shaped by legal requirements that create treatment obligations for doctors or hospitals regardless of how someone pays for care. There is no constitutional right to health in the United States, but various layers of statutory and common law have created some guarantees. That said, despite efforts to increase access over the past decades, the United States is still extraordinary, as compared to peer nations, on the unevenness of access to medical care among its population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":173189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Health Law\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Health Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190846756.013.55\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Health Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190846756.013.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章描绘了美国获得医疗保健的复杂图景。它反映了美国人在卫生团结问题上的矛盾心理。本章首先将医疗保健融资视为定义获得医疗保健的一个关键因素,并描述了多方面的美国医疗保健融资结构,主要是针对特定人群的公共保险计划和针对其他人的受监管的私人保险。接下来,本章描述了获取如何同样受到法律要求的影响,这些法律要求规定了医生或医院的治疗义务,而不管某人如何支付医疗费用。在美国没有宪法规定的健康权利,但不同层次的成文法和普通法创造了一些保障。也就是说,尽管在过去的几十年里,美国努力增加获得医疗服务的机会,但与其他国家相比,美国人口获得医疗服务的不平等程度仍然很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The American Pathology of Inequitable Access to Medical Care
This chapter maps out the complex picture of access to medical care in the United States. It reflects on how variable access illustrates an American ambivalence about health solidarity. The chapter first considers healthcare financing as one critical element that defines access to medical care and describes the multifaceted US healthcare financing structure, predominated by public insurance programs for select populations and regulated private insurance for others. Next, this chapter describes how access is equally shaped by legal requirements that create treatment obligations for doctors or hospitals regardless of how someone pays for care. There is no constitutional right to health in the United States, but various layers of statutory and common law have created some guarantees. That said, despite efforts to increase access over the past decades, the United States is still extraordinary, as compared to peer nations, on the unevenness of access to medical care among its population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信