基于Landsat 8 OLI的不同机器学习分类方法在土地覆盖分类中的性能评价

Auchithya Sajan, Dhanya M
{"title":"基于Landsat 8 OLI的不同机器学习分类方法在土地覆盖分类中的性能评价","authors":"Auchithya Sajan, Dhanya M","doi":"10.1109/CONIT59222.2023.10205822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classification is a technique used for categorizing different features associated with the land cover. It is a very important and visually distinguishable method for understanding the land cover and land use pattern in any area. Classifying images is a part of every study that includes change detection. Various methods are used for classification. Classical, conventional and parametric methods of classification are always time consuming and chances for error are also high. Supervised and unsupervised classification techniques are useful inorder to classify the images into distinguishable forms. For fast and accurate classification it is very vital to build a model that can classify the satellite image. In this study two Machine Learning techniques are used to perform LULC classification and the accuracy of both techniques are compared and a performance assessment is done. For attaining the best classification results it is important to provide good training samples, correct data sets, the best algorithm for classification, etc. So here we use Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) dataset and uniform training sites for all three classification techniques. Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) is done in ArcGIS software, Naive Bayes classification (NBC), and Random Forest Classification (RFC) is done in Google Earth Engine using the same training samples. All three classifiers worked well. To evaluate the accuracy of each classifier, the Kappa coefficient was calculated for each technique by forming a confusion matrix. The accuracy assessment gave a promising result that Random Forest is comparatively the best technique with an accuracy of 94.86% while NBC and MLC also gave satisfactory accuracy values. All three classification techniques applied had certain limitations and were not 100% accurate hence study can be elaborated to find more classifying techniques and their accuracy in order to get the most reliable classification technique.","PeriodicalId":377623,"journal":{"name":"2023 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT)","volume":"330 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Assessment of Various Machine Learning Classification Methods for Classifying the Landcover Using Landsat 8 OLI\",\"authors\":\"Auchithya Sajan, Dhanya M\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CONIT59222.2023.10205822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classification is a technique used for categorizing different features associated with the land cover. It is a very important and visually distinguishable method for understanding the land cover and land use pattern in any area. Classifying images is a part of every study that includes change detection. Various methods are used for classification. Classical, conventional and parametric methods of classification are always time consuming and chances for error are also high. Supervised and unsupervised classification techniques are useful inorder to classify the images into distinguishable forms. For fast and accurate classification it is very vital to build a model that can classify the satellite image. In this study two Machine Learning techniques are used to perform LULC classification and the accuracy of both techniques are compared and a performance assessment is done. For attaining the best classification results it is important to provide good training samples, correct data sets, the best algorithm for classification, etc. So here we use Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) dataset and uniform training sites for all three classification techniques. Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) is done in ArcGIS software, Naive Bayes classification (NBC), and Random Forest Classification (RFC) is done in Google Earth Engine using the same training samples. All three classifiers worked well. To evaluate the accuracy of each classifier, the Kappa coefficient was calculated for each technique by forming a confusion matrix. The accuracy assessment gave a promising result that Random Forest is comparatively the best technique with an accuracy of 94.86% while NBC and MLC also gave satisfactory accuracy values. All three classification techniques applied had certain limitations and were not 100% accurate hence study can be elaborated to find more classifying techniques and their accuracy in order to get the most reliable classification technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT)\",\"volume\":\"330 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONIT59222.2023.10205822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONIT59222.2023.10205822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分类是一种用于对与土地覆盖相关的不同特征进行分类的技术。它是了解任何地区土地覆盖和土地利用格局的一种非常重要和直观的方法。图像分类是包括变化检测在内的每项研究的一部分。用于分类的方法多种多样。经典的、传统的和参数化的分类方法总是很耗时,而且出错的机会也很高。为了将图像分类为可区分的形式,监督和非监督分类技术是有用的。为了实现快速准确的分类,建立一个能够对卫星图像进行分类的模型是至关重要的。在本研究中,使用了两种机器学习技术来执行LULC分类,并比较了两种技术的准确性,并进行了性能评估。为了获得最佳的分类结果,提供良好的训练样本、正确的数据集、最佳的分类算法等是很重要的。因此,在这里,我们使用Landsat 8操作陆地成像仪(OLI)数据集和统一的训练站点来进行所有三种分类技术。最大似然分类(MLC)在ArcGIS软件中完成,朴素贝叶斯分类(NBC)和随机森林分类(RFC)在谷歌地球引擎中使用相同的训练样本完成。这三个分类器都工作得很好。为了评估每个分类器的准确性,通过形成混淆矩阵来计算每种技术的Kappa系数。准确率评估结果表明,随机森林技术相对较好,准确率为94.86%,而NBC和MLC也取得了令人满意的准确率。所采用的三种分类技术都有一定的局限性,并不是100%准确,因此可以通过研究来寻找更多的分类技术及其准确性,以获得最可靠的分类技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Assessment of Various Machine Learning Classification Methods for Classifying the Landcover Using Landsat 8 OLI
Classification is a technique used for categorizing different features associated with the land cover. It is a very important and visually distinguishable method for understanding the land cover and land use pattern in any area. Classifying images is a part of every study that includes change detection. Various methods are used for classification. Classical, conventional and parametric methods of classification are always time consuming and chances for error are also high. Supervised and unsupervised classification techniques are useful inorder to classify the images into distinguishable forms. For fast and accurate classification it is very vital to build a model that can classify the satellite image. In this study two Machine Learning techniques are used to perform LULC classification and the accuracy of both techniques are compared and a performance assessment is done. For attaining the best classification results it is important to provide good training samples, correct data sets, the best algorithm for classification, etc. So here we use Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) dataset and uniform training sites for all three classification techniques. Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) is done in ArcGIS software, Naive Bayes classification (NBC), and Random Forest Classification (RFC) is done in Google Earth Engine using the same training samples. All three classifiers worked well. To evaluate the accuracy of each classifier, the Kappa coefficient was calculated for each technique by forming a confusion matrix. The accuracy assessment gave a promising result that Random Forest is comparatively the best technique with an accuracy of 94.86% while NBC and MLC also gave satisfactory accuracy values. All three classification techniques applied had certain limitations and were not 100% accurate hence study can be elaborated to find more classifying techniques and their accuracy in order to get the most reliable classification technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信