层流手术室与非层流手术室感染形态差异的横断面研究

Selina F, Talha KA, Chowdhury NA, Das S, Khatoon M, Hasan MF
{"title":"层流手术室与非层流手术室感染形态差异的横断面研究","authors":"Selina F, Talha KA, Chowdhury NA, Das S, Khatoon M, Hasan MF","doi":"10.47648/jswmc2023v13-01-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This was a cross-sectional study to compare the infection rate between laminar air flow and non-laminar air flow operation theater (OT). This was bi-center study and study places were the OT complexes of Sylhet Women’s Medical College Hospital (SWMCH) and Al Haramain Hospital Pvt. Ltd. of Sylhet. A Total 24 samples were collected from 12 OTs. Air and wall swab both types of samples were collected from each OT. Out of these 12 OTs 4 had laminar air flow system. Half of the air samples (50%) and 8.3% of wall samples were infected, whereas overall organism isolation rate was 29.17%. Among all the infected samples 25% were from laminar air flow OTs and the rest 75% were from non-laminar air flow OTs. Commonest isolated bacteria was staphylococcus epidermidis (62.5%) followed by bacillusspp (25%) and staphylococcus aureus (12.5%). staphylococcus epidermidis was predominantly found in General Surgery, Obstetrics and septic OTs. Distance from entry or toilet did not show any significant difference in infection rate in operation theaters.","PeriodicalId":407803,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Sectional Study to Evaluate Infection in Operation Theater and Difference in Infection Pattern Between Laminar Air Flow and Non-Laminar Air Flow Operation Theaters\",\"authors\":\"Selina F, Talha KA, Chowdhury NA, Das S, Khatoon M, Hasan MF\",\"doi\":\"10.47648/jswmc2023v13-01-65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This was a cross-sectional study to compare the infection rate between laminar air flow and non-laminar air flow operation theater (OT). This was bi-center study and study places were the OT complexes of Sylhet Women’s Medical College Hospital (SWMCH) and Al Haramain Hospital Pvt. Ltd. of Sylhet. A Total 24 samples were collected from 12 OTs. Air and wall swab both types of samples were collected from each OT. Out of these 12 OTs 4 had laminar air flow system. Half of the air samples (50%) and 8.3% of wall samples were infected, whereas overall organism isolation rate was 29.17%. Among all the infected samples 25% were from laminar air flow OTs and the rest 75% were from non-laminar air flow OTs. Commonest isolated bacteria was staphylococcus epidermidis (62.5%) followed by bacillusspp (25%) and staphylococcus aureus (12.5%). staphylococcus epidermidis was predominantly found in General Surgery, Obstetrics and septic OTs. Distance from entry or toilet did not show any significant difference in infection rate in operation theaters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47648/jswmc2023v13-01-65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47648/jswmc2023v13-01-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是一项横断面研究,比较层流空气和非层流空气手术室(OT)的感染率。这是一个双中心研究,研究地点是锡尔赫特妇女医学院医院(SWMCH)和锡尔赫特Al Haramain医院私人有限公司的OT综合体。12个试验点共采集24份样本。从每个OT收集空气和壁拭子两种类型的样本。在这12个OTs中,4个有层流气流系统。一半的空气样本(50%)和8.3%的壁面样本被感染,而总体微生物分离率为29.17%。在所有感染样本中,层流呼吸道感染占25%,非层流呼吸道感染占75%。最常见的分离细菌是表皮葡萄球菌(62.5%),其次是杆菌(25%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(12.5%)。表皮葡萄球菌主要见于普外科、产科和感染性外伤科。距离入口和厕所的距离对手术室感染率无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Sectional Study to Evaluate Infection in Operation Theater and Difference in Infection Pattern Between Laminar Air Flow and Non-Laminar Air Flow Operation Theaters
This was a cross-sectional study to compare the infection rate between laminar air flow and non-laminar air flow operation theater (OT). This was bi-center study and study places were the OT complexes of Sylhet Women’s Medical College Hospital (SWMCH) and Al Haramain Hospital Pvt. Ltd. of Sylhet. A Total 24 samples were collected from 12 OTs. Air and wall swab both types of samples were collected from each OT. Out of these 12 OTs 4 had laminar air flow system. Half of the air samples (50%) and 8.3% of wall samples were infected, whereas overall organism isolation rate was 29.17%. Among all the infected samples 25% were from laminar air flow OTs and the rest 75% were from non-laminar air flow OTs. Commonest isolated bacteria was staphylococcus epidermidis (62.5%) followed by bacillusspp (25%) and staphylococcus aureus (12.5%). staphylococcus epidermidis was predominantly found in General Surgery, Obstetrics and septic OTs. Distance from entry or toilet did not show any significant difference in infection rate in operation theaters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信