SEEAD:一种基于语义的自动二进制代码去混淆方法

Zhanyong Tang, Kaiyuan Kuang, Lei Wang, Chao Xue, Xiaoqing Gong, Xiaojiang Chen, Dingyi Fang, Jie Liu, Z. Wang
{"title":"SEEAD:一种基于语义的自动二进制代码去混淆方法","authors":"Zhanyong Tang, Kaiyuan Kuang, Lei Wang, Chao Xue, Xiaoqing Gong, Xiaojiang Chen, Dingyi Fang, Jie Liu, Z. Wang","doi":"10.1109/Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.2017.246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly sophisticated code obfuscation techniques are quickly adopted by malware developers to escape from malware detection and to thwart the reverse engineering effort of security analysts. State-of-the-art de-obfuscation approaches rely on dynamic analysis, but face the challenge of low code coverage as not all software execution paths and behavior will be exposed at specific profiling runs. As a result, these approaches often fail to discover hidden malicious patterns. This paper introduces SEEAD, a novel and generic semantic-based de-obfuscation system. When building SEEAD, we try to rely on as few assumptions about the structure of the obfuscation tool as possible, so that the system can keep pace with the fast evolving code obfuscation techniques. To increase the code coverage, SEEAD dynamically directs the target program to execute different paths across different runs. This dynamic profiling scheme is rife with taint and control dependence analysis to reduce the search overhead, and a carefully designed protection scheme to bring the program to an error free status should any error happens during dynamic profile runs. As a result, the increased code coverage enables us to uncover hidden malicious behaviors that are not detected by traditional dynamic analysis based de-obfuscation approaches. We evaluate SEEAD on a range of benign and malicious obfuscated programs. Our experimental results show that SEEAD is able to successfully recover the original logic from obfuscated binaries.","PeriodicalId":170253,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SEEAD: A Semantic-Based Approach for Automatic Binary Code De-obfuscation\",\"authors\":\"Zhanyong Tang, Kaiyuan Kuang, Lei Wang, Chao Xue, Xiaoqing Gong, Xiaojiang Chen, Dingyi Fang, Jie Liu, Z. Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.2017.246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increasingly sophisticated code obfuscation techniques are quickly adopted by malware developers to escape from malware detection and to thwart the reverse engineering effort of security analysts. State-of-the-art de-obfuscation approaches rely on dynamic analysis, but face the challenge of low code coverage as not all software execution paths and behavior will be exposed at specific profiling runs. As a result, these approaches often fail to discover hidden malicious patterns. This paper introduces SEEAD, a novel and generic semantic-based de-obfuscation system. When building SEEAD, we try to rely on as few assumptions about the structure of the obfuscation tool as possible, so that the system can keep pace with the fast evolving code obfuscation techniques. To increase the code coverage, SEEAD dynamically directs the target program to execute different paths across different runs. This dynamic profiling scheme is rife with taint and control dependence analysis to reduce the search overhead, and a carefully designed protection scheme to bring the program to an error free status should any error happens during dynamic profile runs. As a result, the increased code coverage enables us to uncover hidden malicious behaviors that are not detected by traditional dynamic analysis based de-obfuscation approaches. We evaluate SEEAD on a range of benign and malicious obfuscated programs. Our experimental results show that SEEAD is able to successfully recover the original logic from obfuscated binaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.2017.246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.2017.246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

越来越复杂的代码混淆技术被恶意软件开发人员迅速采用,以逃避恶意软件检测并挫败安全分析人员的逆向工程努力。最先进的去混淆方法依赖于动态分析,但是面临低代码覆盖率的挑战,因为不是所有的软件执行路径和行为都将在特定的分析运行中暴露出来。因此,这些方法往往无法发现隐藏的恶意模式。介绍了一种新型的通用的基于语义的去混淆系统SEEAD。在构建SEEAD时,我们尝试尽可能少地依赖于混淆工具结构的假设,以便系统能够与快速发展的代码混淆技术保持同步。为了增加代码覆盖率,SEEAD动态地指导目标程序在不同的运行中执行不同的路径。这种动态分析方案充满了污染和控制依赖分析,以减少搜索开销,并且精心设计了保护方案,以便在动态分析运行期间发生任何错误时使程序处于无错误状态。因此,增加的代码覆盖率使我们能够发现隐藏的恶意行为,这些行为是传统的基于去混淆方法的动态分析无法检测到的。我们在一系列良性和恶意混淆程序上评估SEEAD。实验结果表明,SEEAD能够成功地从混淆的二进制文件中恢复原始逻辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SEEAD: A Semantic-Based Approach for Automatic Binary Code De-obfuscation
Increasingly sophisticated code obfuscation techniques are quickly adopted by malware developers to escape from malware detection and to thwart the reverse engineering effort of security analysts. State-of-the-art de-obfuscation approaches rely on dynamic analysis, but face the challenge of low code coverage as not all software execution paths and behavior will be exposed at specific profiling runs. As a result, these approaches often fail to discover hidden malicious patterns. This paper introduces SEEAD, a novel and generic semantic-based de-obfuscation system. When building SEEAD, we try to rely on as few assumptions about the structure of the obfuscation tool as possible, so that the system can keep pace with the fast evolving code obfuscation techniques. To increase the code coverage, SEEAD dynamically directs the target program to execute different paths across different runs. This dynamic profiling scheme is rife with taint and control dependence analysis to reduce the search overhead, and a carefully designed protection scheme to bring the program to an error free status should any error happens during dynamic profile runs. As a result, the increased code coverage enables us to uncover hidden malicious behaviors that are not detected by traditional dynamic analysis based de-obfuscation approaches. We evaluate SEEAD on a range of benign and malicious obfuscated programs. Our experimental results show that SEEAD is able to successfully recover the original logic from obfuscated binaries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信