利用定量PCR技术对食几丁虫选择性引物进行Illumina Miseq分析差异丰度模式的独立验证

Spencer J. Debenport, Laura M Mason, Richard P Dick
{"title":"利用定量PCR技术对食几丁虫选择性引物进行Illumina Miseq分析差异丰度模式的独立验证","authors":"Spencer J. Debenport, Laura M Mason, Richard P Dick","doi":"10.12691/jaem-11-1-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A criticism of amplicon sequencing is the potential for bias during PCR amplification. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is an independent validation that can estimate taxon abundance and confirm patterns observed in amplicon sequencing patterns. Therefore, the objective was to design primers based on NGS sequencing and test qPCR primers to validate abundance patterns of bacterial and fungal OTUs on soils from the Optimized Shrub-intercropping System (OSS) or Sole Cropping in the Sahel. The results showed that quantitative PCR (qPCR) independently validated patterns observed in high throughput sequencing (HTS) analyses. Specific sub-genus level OTU clusters were found to be significantly enriched in intercropped millet plants in an experiment using the Ilumina MiSeq platform. These OTU sequences were used to design primers to independently validate the trends observed in that study. A total of seven OTU clusters were targeted in the Aspergillus, Chitinophaga, Fusarium, Lasiodiplodia, and Penicillium genera. The majority of those primers showed poor specificity for their intended targets, while the Chitinophaga specific primer set showed clear amplification with a single band at the expected size. This primer was used for qPCR analysis of the same DNA templates used for the Illumina MiSeq study. Quantitative PCR shows significant (P < 0.05) enrichment of Chitinophaga marker DNA that match the previously observed patterns. MiSeq analysis showed two times higher fold change differences in markers than observed in the qPCR study. These results demonstrate that selective primers can be designed from OTU sequence data and that qPCR analysis can be utilized to independently validate trends observed in HTS studies.","PeriodicalId":330542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied &amp; Environmental Microbiology","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independent Validation of Differential Abundance Patterns from Illumina Miseq Analysis Using Quantitative PCR Techniques on the Selective Primer for Chitinophaga\",\"authors\":\"Spencer J. Debenport, Laura M Mason, Richard P Dick\",\"doi\":\"10.12691/jaem-11-1-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A criticism of amplicon sequencing is the potential for bias during PCR amplification. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is an independent validation that can estimate taxon abundance and confirm patterns observed in amplicon sequencing patterns. Therefore, the objective was to design primers based on NGS sequencing and test qPCR primers to validate abundance patterns of bacterial and fungal OTUs on soils from the Optimized Shrub-intercropping System (OSS) or Sole Cropping in the Sahel. The results showed that quantitative PCR (qPCR) independently validated patterns observed in high throughput sequencing (HTS) analyses. Specific sub-genus level OTU clusters were found to be significantly enriched in intercropped millet plants in an experiment using the Ilumina MiSeq platform. These OTU sequences were used to design primers to independently validate the trends observed in that study. A total of seven OTU clusters were targeted in the Aspergillus, Chitinophaga, Fusarium, Lasiodiplodia, and Penicillium genera. The majority of those primers showed poor specificity for their intended targets, while the Chitinophaga specific primer set showed clear amplification with a single band at the expected size. This primer was used for qPCR analysis of the same DNA templates used for the Illumina MiSeq study. Quantitative PCR shows significant (P < 0.05) enrichment of Chitinophaga marker DNA that match the previously observed patterns. MiSeq analysis showed two times higher fold change differences in markers than observed in the qPCR study. These results demonstrate that selective primers can be designed from OTU sequence data and that qPCR analysis can be utilized to independently validate trends observed in HTS studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied &amp; Environmental Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied &amp; Environmental Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12691/jaem-11-1-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied &amp; Environmental Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/jaem-11-1-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对扩增子测序的批评是在PCR扩增过程中可能存在偏见。定量PCR (qPCR)是一种独立的验证方法,可以估计分类群的丰度,并确认扩增子测序模式中观察到的模式。因此,目的是设计基于NGS测序的引物,并测试qPCR引物,以验证萨赫勒地区优化灌木间作系统(OSS)或单一种植系统土壤中细菌和真菌OTUs的丰度模式。结果表明,定量PCR (qPCR)独立验证了高通量测序(HTS)分析中观察到的模式。利用Ilumina MiSeq平台进行的实验发现,间作谷子植物中特定亚属水平的OTU簇显著富集。这些OTU序列用于设计引物,以独立验证该研究中观察到的趋势。在曲霉属、食几丁菌属、镰刀菌属、Lasiodiplodia属和青霉属中共有7个OTU簇。大多数引物对预期目标的特异性较差,而Chitinophaga特异性引物组在预期大小下显示出清晰的单条带扩增。该引物用于qPCR分析与Illumina MiSeq研究相同的DNA模板。定量PCR结果显示,食几丁虫标记DNA显著富集(P < 0.05),与先前观察的模式相符。MiSeq分析显示,标记物的折叠变化差异比qPCR研究高两倍。这些结果表明,可以根据OTU序列数据设计选择性引物,qPCR分析可以用于独立验证HTS研究中观察到的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Independent Validation of Differential Abundance Patterns from Illumina Miseq Analysis Using Quantitative PCR Techniques on the Selective Primer for Chitinophaga
A criticism of amplicon sequencing is the potential for bias during PCR amplification. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is an independent validation that can estimate taxon abundance and confirm patterns observed in amplicon sequencing patterns. Therefore, the objective was to design primers based on NGS sequencing and test qPCR primers to validate abundance patterns of bacterial and fungal OTUs on soils from the Optimized Shrub-intercropping System (OSS) or Sole Cropping in the Sahel. The results showed that quantitative PCR (qPCR) independently validated patterns observed in high throughput sequencing (HTS) analyses. Specific sub-genus level OTU clusters were found to be significantly enriched in intercropped millet plants in an experiment using the Ilumina MiSeq platform. These OTU sequences were used to design primers to independently validate the trends observed in that study. A total of seven OTU clusters were targeted in the Aspergillus, Chitinophaga, Fusarium, Lasiodiplodia, and Penicillium genera. The majority of those primers showed poor specificity for their intended targets, while the Chitinophaga specific primer set showed clear amplification with a single band at the expected size. This primer was used for qPCR analysis of the same DNA templates used for the Illumina MiSeq study. Quantitative PCR shows significant (P < 0.05) enrichment of Chitinophaga marker DNA that match the previously observed patterns. MiSeq analysis showed two times higher fold change differences in markers than observed in the qPCR study. These results demonstrate that selective primers can be designed from OTU sequence data and that qPCR analysis can be utilized to independently validate trends observed in HTS studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信