信任的缺失与动态

Abhaya C. Nayak
{"title":"信任的缺失与动态","authors":"Abhaya C. Nayak","doi":"10.1109/EUC.2010.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trust and Belief are two very closely connected notions. Hence one would expect that any mechanism that guides the management of one can efficaciously guide the other. In fact, devices such as Dempster-Shafer’s theory of evidence have been successfully used in the management of both. This paper looks at a different mechanism devised for inductive inferencing, namely Spohn’s Ordinal Conditional Functions, and shows that, when appropriately adapted and interpreted, it can fruitfully model the dynamics of trust via trust deficit.","PeriodicalId":265175,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Deficit and Dynamics of Trust\",\"authors\":\"Abhaya C. Nayak\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EUC.2010.85\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trust and Belief are two very closely connected notions. Hence one would expect that any mechanism that guides the management of one can efficaciously guide the other. In fact, devices such as Dempster-Shafer’s theory of evidence have been successfully used in the management of both. This paper looks at a different mechanism devised for inductive inferencing, namely Spohn’s Ordinal Conditional Functions, and shows that, when appropriately adapted and interpreted, it can fruitfully model the dynamics of trust via trust deficit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EUC.2010.85\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EUC.2010.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

信任和信念是两个紧密相连的概念。因此,人们会期望任何指导其中一个管理的机制都能有效地指导另一个。事实上,Dempster-Shafer的证据理论等方法已经成功地应用于两者的管理中。本文着眼于为归纳推理设计的另一种机制,即Spohn的有序条件函数,并表明,当适当地适应和解释时,它可以通过信任赤字有效地模拟信任的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Deficit and Dynamics of Trust
Trust and Belief are two very closely connected notions. Hence one would expect that any mechanism that guides the management of one can efficaciously guide the other. In fact, devices such as Dempster-Shafer’s theory of evidence have been successfully used in the management of both. This paper looks at a different mechanism devised for inductive inferencing, namely Spohn’s Ordinal Conditional Functions, and shows that, when appropriately adapted and interpreted, it can fruitfully model the dynamics of trust via trust deficit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信