{"title":"大规模并行系统中的哈希表","authors":"I. Yen, F. Bastani","doi":"10.1109/IPPS.1992.222988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors look at the performance and new collision resolution strategies for hash tables in massively parallel systems. The results show that using a hash table with linear probing yields O(logN) time performance for handling M accesses by N processors when the load factor of the table is 50%, where N is the size of the hash table. This is better than the performance of using sorted arrays. Two phase hashing gives an average time complexity O(logN) for M simultaneous accesses to a hash table of size N even when the table has 100% load. Simulation results also show that hypercube hashing significantly outperforms linear probing and double hashing.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":340070,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Sixth International Parallel Processing Symposium","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hash table in massively parallel systems\",\"authors\":\"I. Yen, F. Bastani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPPS.1992.222988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors look at the performance and new collision resolution strategies for hash tables in massively parallel systems. The results show that using a hash table with linear probing yields O(logN) time performance for handling M accesses by N processors when the load factor of the table is 50%, where N is the size of the hash table. This is better than the performance of using sorted arrays. Two phase hashing gives an average time complexity O(logN) for M simultaneous accesses to a hash table of size N even when the table has 100% load. Simulation results also show that hypercube hashing significantly outperforms linear probing and double hashing.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":340070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Sixth International Parallel Processing Symposium\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Sixth International Parallel Processing Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPPS.1992.222988\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Sixth International Parallel Processing Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPPS.1992.222988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The authors look at the performance and new collision resolution strategies for hash tables in massively parallel systems. The results show that using a hash table with linear probing yields O(logN) time performance for handling M accesses by N processors when the load factor of the table is 50%, where N is the size of the hash table. This is better than the performance of using sorted arrays. Two phase hashing gives an average time complexity O(logN) for M simultaneous accesses to a hash table of size N even when the table has 100% load. Simulation results also show that hypercube hashing significantly outperforms linear probing and double hashing.<>