Y. S. Kim, Jong Pil Kim, P. Chung, H. M. Lee, Bo Sung Go
{"title":"单小切口微创钢板内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的效果","authors":"Y. S. Kim, Jong Pil Kim, P. Chung, H. M. Lee, Bo Sung Go","doi":"10.12671/jkfs.2020.33.2.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial support: None. Conflict of interests: None. Purpose: This study compared minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using a single small skin incision and conventional open volar locking plate fixation (OP) for distal radius fracture to identify outcome difference. Materials and Methods: Forty-three patients who underwent MIPO using a single small skin incision or OP for distal radius fractures were evaluated retrospectively. Of the patients, 21 were treated with MIPO using a single small skin incision and 22 with the OP method through the conventional volar approach. The postoperative radiographic results and clinical outcomes at the final follow-up in each group were compared. Results: All patients achieved bone union in the MIPO and OP groups. No significant differences in the bone union time, alignment, range of motion, QuickDASH, or pain score were observed. On the other hand, the size of the incision was significant: 23 mm in the MIPO group and 55 mm in the OP group (p<0.001). Conclusion: MIPO technique using a single small incision showed similar satisfactory radiographic and functional outcomes compared to conventional OP for distal radius fractures. The MIPO technique using a single small incision offered advantages, including cosmetic benefits and minimal soft tissue damage, is recommended, particularly in young women and high functional demand patients.","PeriodicalId":436464,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Fracture Society","volume":"180 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of Single Small Incision Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of the Distal Radius Fractures\",\"authors\":\"Y. S. Kim, Jong Pil Kim, P. Chung, H. M. Lee, Bo Sung Go\",\"doi\":\"10.12671/jkfs.2020.33.2.72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Financial support: None. Conflict of interests: None. Purpose: This study compared minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using a single small skin incision and conventional open volar locking plate fixation (OP) for distal radius fracture to identify outcome difference. Materials and Methods: Forty-three patients who underwent MIPO using a single small skin incision or OP for distal radius fractures were evaluated retrospectively. Of the patients, 21 were treated with MIPO using a single small skin incision and 22 with the OP method through the conventional volar approach. The postoperative radiographic results and clinical outcomes at the final follow-up in each group were compared. Results: All patients achieved bone union in the MIPO and OP groups. No significant differences in the bone union time, alignment, range of motion, QuickDASH, or pain score were observed. On the other hand, the size of the incision was significant: 23 mm in the MIPO group and 55 mm in the OP group (p<0.001). Conclusion: MIPO technique using a single small incision showed similar satisfactory radiographic and functional outcomes compared to conventional OP for distal radius fractures. The MIPO technique using a single small incision offered advantages, including cosmetic benefits and minimal soft tissue damage, is recommended, particularly in young women and high functional demand patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Fracture Society\",\"volume\":\"180 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Fracture Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2020.33.2.72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Fracture Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2020.33.2.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
资金支持:无。利益冲突:无。目的:本研究比较了采用单个小皮肤切口的微创钢板内固定(MIPO)和传统的开放掌侧锁定钢板内固定(OP)治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效差异。材料与方法:回顾性分析43例桡骨远端骨折采用单小切口或OP行MIPO治疗的患者。其中21例采用单切口小皮肤MIPO治疗,22例采用常规掌侧入路OP方法治疗。比较两组患者术后影像学结果及终期随访的临床结果。结果:MIPO组和OP组均实现骨愈合。在骨愈合时间、对齐、活动范围、QuickDASH或疼痛评分方面没有观察到显著差异。另一方面,切口大小有显著性差异:MIPO组为23 mm, OP组为55 mm (p<0.001)。结论:与传统手术相比,采用单一小切口的MIPO技术治疗桡骨远端骨折具有令人满意的影像学和功能效果。使用单个小切口的MIPO技术具有优点,包括美容效果和最小的软组织损伤,特别推荐用于年轻女性和高功能需求患者。
Results of Single Small Incision Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of the Distal Radius Fractures
Financial support: None. Conflict of interests: None. Purpose: This study compared minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using a single small skin incision and conventional open volar locking plate fixation (OP) for distal radius fracture to identify outcome difference. Materials and Methods: Forty-three patients who underwent MIPO using a single small skin incision or OP for distal radius fractures were evaluated retrospectively. Of the patients, 21 were treated with MIPO using a single small skin incision and 22 with the OP method through the conventional volar approach. The postoperative radiographic results and clinical outcomes at the final follow-up in each group were compared. Results: All patients achieved bone union in the MIPO and OP groups. No significant differences in the bone union time, alignment, range of motion, QuickDASH, or pain score were observed. On the other hand, the size of the incision was significant: 23 mm in the MIPO group and 55 mm in the OP group (p<0.001). Conclusion: MIPO technique using a single small incision showed similar satisfactory radiographic and functional outcomes compared to conventional OP for distal radius fractures. The MIPO technique using a single small incision offered advantages, including cosmetic benefits and minimal soft tissue damage, is recommended, particularly in young women and high functional demand patients.