研究质量保证中的伦理困境

H. Lucas
{"title":"研究质量保证中的伦理困境","authors":"H. Lucas","doi":"10.1002/QAJ.344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay three examples of ethical dilemmas in research quality assurance are presented. For one of the examples, dealing with the use of placebo control groups in bio-medical research on humans, the balance between ethical and scientific considerations will be evaluated on basis of a critical review of the applicable standards and/or regulations, such as the Declaration of Helsinki and the current Good Clinical Practice (GCP) regulations. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":147931,"journal":{"name":"Quality Assurance Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical dilemmas in research quality assurance\",\"authors\":\"H. Lucas\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/QAJ.344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this essay three examples of ethical dilemmas in research quality assurance are presented. For one of the examples, dealing with the use of placebo control groups in bio-medical research on humans, the balance between ethical and scientific considerations will be evaluated on basis of a critical review of the applicable standards and/or regulations, such as the Declaration of Helsinki and the current Good Clinical Practice (GCP) regulations. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality Assurance Journal\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality Assurance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/QAJ.344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Assurance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/QAJ.344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,提出了三个研究质量保证中的伦理困境的例子。例如,处理在人体生物医学研究中使用安慰剂对照组的问题,将根据对适用标准和/或条例(如《赫尔辛基宣言》和现行良好临床规范条例)的严格审查,评估伦理和科学考虑之间的平衡。版权所有©2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical dilemmas in research quality assurance
In this essay three examples of ethical dilemmas in research quality assurance are presented. For one of the examples, dealing with the use of placebo control groups in bio-medical research on humans, the balance between ethical and scientific considerations will be evaluated on basis of a critical review of the applicable standards and/or regulations, such as the Declaration of Helsinki and the current Good Clinical Practice (GCP) regulations. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信