视频语义索引的时间重新评分与时间描述符

Abdelkader Hamadi, P. Mulhem, G. Quénot
{"title":"视频语义索引的时间重新评分与时间描述符","authors":"Abdelkader Hamadi, P. Mulhem, G. Quénot","doi":"10.1109/CBMI.2015.7153626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The automated indexing of image and video is a difficult problem because of the “distance” between the arrays of numbers encoding these documents and the concepts (e.g. people, places, events or objects) with which we wish to annotate them. Methods exist for this but their results are far from satisfactory in terms of generality and accuracy. Existing methods typically use a single set of such examples and consider it as uniform. This is not optimal because the same concept may appear in various contexts and its appearance may be very different depending upon these contexts. The context has been widely used in the state of the art to treat various problems. However, the temporal context seems to be the most crucial and the most effective for the case of videos. In this paper, we present a comparative study between two methods exploiting the temporal context for semantic video indexing. The proposed approaches use temporal information that is derived from two different sources: low-level content and semantic information. Our experiments on TRECVID'12 collection showed interesting results that confirm the usefulness of the temporal context and demonstrate which of the two approaches is more effective.","PeriodicalId":387496,"journal":{"name":"2015 13th International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI)","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal re-scoring vs. temporal descriptors for semantic indexing of videos\",\"authors\":\"Abdelkader Hamadi, P. Mulhem, G. Quénot\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CBMI.2015.7153626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The automated indexing of image and video is a difficult problem because of the “distance” between the arrays of numbers encoding these documents and the concepts (e.g. people, places, events or objects) with which we wish to annotate them. Methods exist for this but their results are far from satisfactory in terms of generality and accuracy. Existing methods typically use a single set of such examples and consider it as uniform. This is not optimal because the same concept may appear in various contexts and its appearance may be very different depending upon these contexts. The context has been widely used in the state of the art to treat various problems. However, the temporal context seems to be the most crucial and the most effective for the case of videos. In this paper, we present a comparative study between two methods exploiting the temporal context for semantic video indexing. The proposed approaches use temporal information that is derived from two different sources: low-level content and semantic information. Our experiments on TRECVID'12 collection showed interesting results that confirm the usefulness of the temporal context and demonstrate which of the two approaches is more effective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 13th International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI)\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 13th International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMI.2015.7153626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 13th International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMI.2015.7153626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

图像和视频的自动索引是一个难题,因为编码这些文档的数字数组与我们希望注释它们的概念(例如人物、地点、事件或对象)之间存在“距离”。这方面已有方法,但其结果在通用性和准确性方面远不能令人满意。现有的方法通常使用一组这样的例子,并认为它是统一的。这不是最优的,因为相同的概念可能出现在不同的上下文中,并且根据这些上下文中,它的外观可能非常不同。上下文已被广泛应用于当前的技术水平来处理各种问题。然而,对于视频来说,时间背景似乎是最关键和最有效的。在本文中,我们对两种利用时间上下文进行语义视频索引的方法进行了比较研究。所提出的方法使用来自两个不同来源的时间信息:低级内容和语义信息。我们在TRECVID'12收集上的实验显示了有趣的结果,证实了时间上下文的有用性,并证明了两种方法中哪一种更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal re-scoring vs. temporal descriptors for semantic indexing of videos
The automated indexing of image and video is a difficult problem because of the “distance” between the arrays of numbers encoding these documents and the concepts (e.g. people, places, events or objects) with which we wish to annotate them. Methods exist for this but their results are far from satisfactory in terms of generality and accuracy. Existing methods typically use a single set of such examples and consider it as uniform. This is not optimal because the same concept may appear in various contexts and its appearance may be very different depending upon these contexts. The context has been widely used in the state of the art to treat various problems. However, the temporal context seems to be the most crucial and the most effective for the case of videos. In this paper, we present a comparative study between two methods exploiting the temporal context for semantic video indexing. The proposed approaches use temporal information that is derived from two different sources: low-level content and semantic information. Our experiments on TRECVID'12 collection showed interesting results that confirm the usefulness of the temporal context and demonstrate which of the two approaches is more effective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信