{"title":"锁相环稳定时间:相位vs.频率","authors":"D. E. Phillips","doi":"10.1109/TCC.1994.472121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tuning speed of frequency synthesizers is usually specified by either phase or frequency settling. The paper shows that in frequency hopping systems phase settling characteristics correspond to system performance better than frequency settling characteristics. Simulation results are compared to a mathematical analysis, and intuitive explanations are used to clarify this paradoxical relationship. Specific phase settling specifications are discussed.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":206310,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of TCC'94 - Tactical Communications Conference","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PLL settling time: phase vs. frequency\",\"authors\":\"D. E. Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TCC.1994.472121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The tuning speed of frequency synthesizers is usually specified by either phase or frequency settling. The paper shows that in frequency hopping systems phase settling characteristics correspond to system performance better than frequency settling characteristics. Simulation results are compared to a mathematical analysis, and intuitive explanations are used to clarify this paradoxical relationship. Specific phase settling specifications are discussed.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":206310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of TCC'94 - Tactical Communications Conference\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of TCC'94 - Tactical Communications Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.1994.472121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of TCC'94 - Tactical Communications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.1994.472121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The tuning speed of frequency synthesizers is usually specified by either phase or frequency settling. The paper shows that in frequency hopping systems phase settling characteristics correspond to system performance better than frequency settling characteristics. Simulation results are compared to a mathematical analysis, and intuitive explanations are used to clarify this paradoxical relationship. Specific phase settling specifications are discussed.<>