拉莫三嗪(Sazar)治疗癫痫的四年经验。卢卡神经系统疾病和癫痫的诊断、治疗和康复医疗机构协会

K. Mukhin, O. Pylaeva, M. Bobylova, N. V. Freydkova
{"title":"拉莫三嗪(Sazar)治疗癫痫的四年经验。卢卡神经系统疾病和癫痫的诊断、治疗和康复医疗机构协会","authors":"K. Mukhin, O. Pylaeva, M. Bobylova, N. V. Freydkova","doi":"10.17650/2073-8803-2022-17-3-8-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To assess the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine (Sazar) for various forms of epilepsy, based on long-term experience of Svt. Luka's Association of Medical Institutions for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Rehabilitation of Nervous System Diseases and Epilepsy. We analyzed the data obtained during 4 years (from June 2018 to August 2022).Materials and methods. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of Sazar in 104 patients aged 3 to 37 years (87 children and 17 adults (12 women and 5 men)); their mean age was 9.7 years. The sample included 42 males and 62 females. All of them were treated at Svt. Luka's Association of Medical Institutions for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Rehabilitation of Nervous System Diseases and Epilepsy.The sample included patients with structural and presumably structural focal epilepsy (n = 44), focal epilepsy of unknown etiology (n = 6), genetic and presumably genetic epilepsy and epileptic encephalopathies (n = 43), idiopathic epilepsy (n = 11).Sazar was used as a monotherapy in 38 patients, whereas 66 patients received it in combination with other antiepileptic drugs (AED) (Sazar + 1 AED in 48 patients; Sazar + 2 AED in 18 patients). Two patients initially receiving polytherapy were successfully transferred to Sazar monotherapy.The dose of Sazar varied between 75 and 400 mg/day. In the majority of patients, including all children, Sazar daily dose was split into 2 portions. Three adult patients received Cazar once a day either in the evening (n = 2) or in the morning (n = 1) at a dose of 200 mg/day. The follow-up time was between 6 months and over 4 years.Results and conclusion. Therapeutic remission was achieved in 47 out of 104 patients (45.2 %) receiving Sazar. As many as 35 patients (33.6 %) demonstrated an at least 50 % reduction in seizure frequency; 22 patients had no effect (21.2 %). None of the participants developed significant aggravation.Only 9 patients (8.6 %) discontinued Caser due to its initial low efficacy, while another 8 patients (7.6 %) stopped to receive Casar because it became ineffective after 6–12 months of treatment. In general, good therapeutic effect (remission or at least 50 % reduction in seizure frequency) was achieved in 82 out of 104 patients (78.8 %). Given the fact that this study included patients with severe epilepsy, we can conclude that treatment was very effective.Casar was most effective in patients with focal epilepsy (including structural, presumably structural, structural-genetic, and that of unidentified etiology) and idiopathic generalized epilepsy.The majority of the patients (n = 94; 90.4 %) demonstrated good tolerability of Casar. Casar-associated side effects were registered in 10 patients (9.6 %). Allergic skin rash was observed in 5 cases (4.8 %) and developed during the first 2 months of therapy. Allergic reactions accounted for 50 % of all side effects and were the only reason for Casar discontinuation due to poor tolerability.Two female patients of reproductive age started Sazar to reduce the valproate dose that caused severe menstrual disorders, weight gain, alopecia, and edema. Halving the dose of valproate (up to 750 mg/day) in combination with Casar significantly improved treatment tolerance. One patient gave birth to a healthy baby when she was receiving monotherapy with Sazar at a dose of 350 mg/day.Eight patients receiving Sazar reported a significant improvement in their mood and behavior (one patient that had earlier been diagnosed with depression discontinued antidepressants after Sazar initiation since she did not need them any longer). None of the patients reported any negative effects of Sazar on their memory, attention, mood, and behavior (as evaluated by patients and parents; in some cases, by a neuropsychologist).Patients’ adherence to treatment confirmed high Sazar efficacy and tolerability: 82 out of 104 patients (78.8 %) continued to receive the drug after 6 months of treatment and 69 patients (66.3 %) still continued it after 12 months of treatment. The follow-up period varied between 6 months and 4 years.Thus, our findings suggest high efficacy and good tolerability of long-term therapy with Sazar in patients with different forms of epilepsy.","PeriodicalId":196950,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Child Neurology","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lamotrigine (Sazar) in the treatment of epilepsy: four years of experience in Svt. Luka's Association of Medical institutions for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Rehabilitation of Nervous System Diseases and Epilepsy\",\"authors\":\"K. Mukhin, O. Pylaeva, M. Bobylova, N. V. Freydkova\",\"doi\":\"10.17650/2073-8803-2022-17-3-8-36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim. To assess the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine (Sazar) for various forms of epilepsy, based on long-term experience of Svt. Luka's Association of Medical Institutions for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Rehabilitation of Nervous System Diseases and Epilepsy. We analyzed the data obtained during 4 years (from June 2018 to August 2022).Materials and methods. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of Sazar in 104 patients aged 3 to 37 years (87 children and 17 adults (12 women and 5 men)); their mean age was 9.7 years. The sample included 42 males and 62 females. All of them were treated at Svt. Luka's Association of Medical Institutions for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Rehabilitation of Nervous System Diseases and Epilepsy.The sample included patients with structural and presumably structural focal epilepsy (n = 44), focal epilepsy of unknown etiology (n = 6), genetic and presumably genetic epilepsy and epileptic encephalopathies (n = 43), idiopathic epilepsy (n = 11).Sazar was used as a monotherapy in 38 patients, whereas 66 patients received it in combination with other antiepileptic drugs (AED) (Sazar + 1 AED in 48 patients; Sazar + 2 AED in 18 patients). Two patients initially receiving polytherapy were successfully transferred to Sazar monotherapy.The dose of Sazar varied between 75 and 400 mg/day. In the majority of patients, including all children, Sazar daily dose was split into 2 portions. Three adult patients received Cazar once a day either in the evening (n = 2) or in the morning (n = 1) at a dose of 200 mg/day. The follow-up time was between 6 months and over 4 years.Results and conclusion. Therapeutic remission was achieved in 47 out of 104 patients (45.2 %) receiving Sazar. As many as 35 patients (33.6 %) demonstrated an at least 50 % reduction in seizure frequency; 22 patients had no effect (21.2 %). None of the participants developed significant aggravation.Only 9 patients (8.6 %) discontinued Caser due to its initial low efficacy, while another 8 patients (7.6 %) stopped to receive Casar because it became ineffective after 6–12 months of treatment. In general, good therapeutic effect (remission or at least 50 % reduction in seizure frequency) was achieved in 82 out of 104 patients (78.8 %). Given the fact that this study included patients with severe epilepsy, we can conclude that treatment was very effective.Casar was most effective in patients with focal epilepsy (including structural, presumably structural, structural-genetic, and that of unidentified etiology) and idiopathic generalized epilepsy.The majority of the patients (n = 94; 90.4 %) demonstrated good tolerability of Casar. Casar-associated side effects were registered in 10 patients (9.6 %). Allergic skin rash was observed in 5 cases (4.8 %) and developed during the first 2 months of therapy. Allergic reactions accounted for 50 % of all side effects and were the only reason for Casar discontinuation due to poor tolerability.Two female patients of reproductive age started Sazar to reduce the valproate dose that caused severe menstrual disorders, weight gain, alopecia, and edema. Halving the dose of valproate (up to 750 mg/day) in combination with Casar significantly improved treatment tolerance. One patient gave birth to a healthy baby when she was receiving monotherapy with Sazar at a dose of 350 mg/day.Eight patients receiving Sazar reported a significant improvement in their mood and behavior (one patient that had earlier been diagnosed with depression discontinued antidepressants after Sazar initiation since she did not need them any longer). None of the patients reported any negative effects of Sazar on their memory, attention, mood, and behavior (as evaluated by patients and parents; in some cases, by a neuropsychologist).Patients’ adherence to treatment confirmed high Sazar efficacy and tolerability: 82 out of 104 patients (78.8 %) continued to receive the drug after 6 months of treatment and 69 patients (66.3 %) still continued it after 12 months of treatment. The follow-up period varied between 6 months and 4 years.Thus, our findings suggest high efficacy and good tolerability of long-term therapy with Sazar in patients with different forms of epilepsy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Child Neurology\",\"volume\":\"144 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Child Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17650/2073-8803-2022-17-3-8-36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/2073-8803-2022-17-3-8-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

的目标。基于长期使用Svt的经验,评估拉莫三嗪(Sazar)治疗各种形式癫痫的疗效和耐受性。卢卡神经系统疾病和癫痫的诊断、治疗和康复医疗机构协会。我们分析了4年间(2018年6月至2022年8月)获得的数据。材料和方法。我们评估了104例3 - 37岁患者(87名儿童和17名成人(12名女性和5名男性))的疗效和耐受性;他们的平均年龄为9.7岁。样本包括42名男性和62名女性。他们都在Svt接受过治疗。卢卡神经系统疾病和癫痫的诊断、治疗和康复医疗机构协会。样本包括结构性和推定结构性局灶性癫痫(n = 44),病因不明的局灶性癫痫(n = 6),遗传性和推定遗传性癫痫和癫痫性脑病(n = 43),特发性癫痫(n = 11)。38例患者单独使用Sazar, 66例患者联合其他抗癫痫药物(AED)(48例患者使用Sazar + 1 AED;Sazar + 2 AED(18例)。两名最初接受综合治疗的患者成功地转移到Sazar单一治疗。Sazar的剂量在75至400毫克/天之间变化。在大多数患者中,包括所有儿童,Sazar每日剂量分为2份。三名成年患者每天接受一次Cazar治疗,分别在晚上(n = 2)或早上(n = 1),剂量为200mg /天。随访时间为6个月至4年以上。结果与结论。104例接受Sazar治疗的患者中有47例(45.2%)达到治疗缓解。多达35名患者(33.6%)表现出癫痫发作频率至少降低50%;22例无效(21.2%)。没有参与者出现明显的恶化。只有9名患者(8.6%)因其最初的低疗效而停用Casar,而另外8名患者(7.6%)因其在治疗6-12个月后无效而停止接受Casar。总的来说,104例患者中有82例(78.8%)获得了良好的治疗效果(癫痫发作频率缓解或至少减少50%)。考虑到这项研究包括严重癫痫患者,我们可以得出结论,治疗是非常有效的。Casar对局灶性癫痫(包括结构性,可能是结构性,结构遗传性和病因不明)和特发性全身性癫痫患者最有效。大多数患者(n = 94;90.4%)表现出良好的Casar耐受性。10例患者(9.6%)出现卡萨相关副作用。5例(4.8%)在治疗前2个月出现过敏性皮疹。过敏反应占所有副作用的50%,是卡萨因耐受性差而停药的唯一原因。2名育龄女性患者开始Sazar,以减少丙戊酸盐剂量,导致严重的月经紊乱、体重增加、脱发和水肿。将丙戊酸盐剂量减半(高达750mg /天)与Casar联合使用可显著改善治疗耐受性。一名患者在接受350毫克/天的Sazar单药治疗时,生下了一名健康婴儿。8名接受Sazar治疗的患者报告说,他们的情绪和行为有了显著改善(一名早期被诊断为抑郁症的患者在Sazar治疗开始后停止服用抗抑郁药物,因为她不再需要它们了)。没有患者报告Sazar对他们的记忆、注意力、情绪和行为有任何负面影响(由患者和家长评估;在某些情况下,由神经心理学家)。患者对治疗的依从性证实了较高的Sazar疗效和耐受性:104例患者中有82例(78.8%)在治疗6个月后继续服用该药,69例(66.3%)在治疗12个月后仍继续服用该药。随访时间从6个月到4年不等。因此,我们的研究结果表明,saazar对不同类型癫痫患者的长期治疗具有很高的疗效和良好的耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lamotrigine (Sazar) in the treatment of epilepsy: four years of experience in Svt. Luka's Association of Medical institutions for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Rehabilitation of Nervous System Diseases and Epilepsy
Aim. To assess the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine (Sazar) for various forms of epilepsy, based on long-term experience of Svt. Luka's Association of Medical Institutions for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Rehabilitation of Nervous System Diseases and Epilepsy. We analyzed the data obtained during 4 years (from June 2018 to August 2022).Materials and methods. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of Sazar in 104 patients aged 3 to 37 years (87 children and 17 adults (12 women and 5 men)); their mean age was 9.7 years. The sample included 42 males and 62 females. All of them were treated at Svt. Luka's Association of Medical Institutions for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Rehabilitation of Nervous System Diseases and Epilepsy.The sample included patients with structural and presumably structural focal epilepsy (n = 44), focal epilepsy of unknown etiology (n = 6), genetic and presumably genetic epilepsy and epileptic encephalopathies (n = 43), idiopathic epilepsy (n = 11).Sazar was used as a monotherapy in 38 patients, whereas 66 patients received it in combination with other antiepileptic drugs (AED) (Sazar + 1 AED in 48 patients; Sazar + 2 AED in 18 patients). Two patients initially receiving polytherapy were successfully transferred to Sazar monotherapy.The dose of Sazar varied between 75 and 400 mg/day. In the majority of patients, including all children, Sazar daily dose was split into 2 portions. Three adult patients received Cazar once a day either in the evening (n = 2) or in the morning (n = 1) at a dose of 200 mg/day. The follow-up time was between 6 months and over 4 years.Results and conclusion. Therapeutic remission was achieved in 47 out of 104 patients (45.2 %) receiving Sazar. As many as 35 patients (33.6 %) demonstrated an at least 50 % reduction in seizure frequency; 22 patients had no effect (21.2 %). None of the participants developed significant aggravation.Only 9 patients (8.6 %) discontinued Caser due to its initial low efficacy, while another 8 patients (7.6 %) stopped to receive Casar because it became ineffective after 6–12 months of treatment. In general, good therapeutic effect (remission or at least 50 % reduction in seizure frequency) was achieved in 82 out of 104 patients (78.8 %). Given the fact that this study included patients with severe epilepsy, we can conclude that treatment was very effective.Casar was most effective in patients with focal epilepsy (including structural, presumably structural, structural-genetic, and that of unidentified etiology) and idiopathic generalized epilepsy.The majority of the patients (n = 94; 90.4 %) demonstrated good tolerability of Casar. Casar-associated side effects were registered in 10 patients (9.6 %). Allergic skin rash was observed in 5 cases (4.8 %) and developed during the first 2 months of therapy. Allergic reactions accounted for 50 % of all side effects and were the only reason for Casar discontinuation due to poor tolerability.Two female patients of reproductive age started Sazar to reduce the valproate dose that caused severe menstrual disorders, weight gain, alopecia, and edema. Halving the dose of valproate (up to 750 mg/day) in combination with Casar significantly improved treatment tolerance. One patient gave birth to a healthy baby when she was receiving monotherapy with Sazar at a dose of 350 mg/day.Eight patients receiving Sazar reported a significant improvement in their mood and behavior (one patient that had earlier been diagnosed with depression discontinued antidepressants after Sazar initiation since she did not need them any longer). None of the patients reported any negative effects of Sazar on their memory, attention, mood, and behavior (as evaluated by patients and parents; in some cases, by a neuropsychologist).Patients’ adherence to treatment confirmed high Sazar efficacy and tolerability: 82 out of 104 patients (78.8 %) continued to receive the drug after 6 months of treatment and 69 patients (66.3 %) still continued it after 12 months of treatment. The follow-up period varied between 6 months and 4 years.Thus, our findings suggest high efficacy and good tolerability of long-term therapy with Sazar in patients with different forms of epilepsy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信