颜色能超越文化吗?

M. McCool
{"title":"颜色能超越文化吗?","authors":"M. McCool","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2008.4610221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The taboo approach toward color emphasizes its negative implications within highly contextualized cultural events. Depending on the situation, yellow may be a sign of mourning, red a sign of communism, and white a sign of death. While the taboo approach to color is an important part of human-computer interaction, its full impact is questionable in relation to a small set of universal color prototypes. This paper presents data illustrating and explaining color prototypes and then suggests possibilities for their application in computing systems.","PeriodicalId":131068,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can color transcend culture?\",\"authors\":\"M. McCool\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPCC.2008.4610221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The taboo approach toward color emphasizes its negative implications within highly contextualized cultural events. Depending on the situation, yellow may be a sign of mourning, red a sign of communism, and white a sign of death. While the taboo approach to color is an important part of human-computer interaction, its full impact is questionable in relation to a small set of universal color prototypes. This paper presents data illustrating and explaining color prototypes and then suggests possibilities for their application in computing systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2008.4610221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2008.4610221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对颜色的禁忌方法强调其在高度情境化的文化事件中的负面影响。根据不同的情况,黄色可能是哀悼的标志,红色是共产主义的标志,白色是死亡的标志。虽然对颜色的禁忌方法是人机交互的重要组成部分,但与一小部分通用颜色原型相比,它的全部影响是值得怀疑的。本文给出了说明和解释颜色原型的数据,然后提出了它们在计算系统中应用的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can color transcend culture?
The taboo approach toward color emphasizes its negative implications within highly contextualized cultural events. Depending on the situation, yellow may be a sign of mourning, red a sign of communism, and white a sign of death. While the taboo approach to color is an important part of human-computer interaction, its full impact is questionable in relation to a small set of universal color prototypes. This paper presents data illustrating and explaining color prototypes and then suggests possibilities for their application in computing systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信