东欧四国的心理健康融资与采购

G. Cosoveanu, M. Dlouhý, H. Hinkov, Pavol Čižmárik
{"title":"东欧四国的心理健康融资与采购","authors":"G. Cosoveanu, M. Dlouhý, H. Hinkov, Pavol Čižmárik","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1810080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this international comparison are: a) to describe and analyze the current status of mental health financing and purchasing in Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Bulgaria; b) to identify common trends as well as national specifics in mental health financing and purchasing and find opportunities for transfer of knowledge and experience among the countries, c) to improve understanding of the attitudes towards mental health services in the countries. Methods: The country-specific information was obtained by a questionnaire that was developed by the research team in the project “Finance and Mental Health Services Training in Czech Republic/Central Europe”, sponsored by the U.S. National Institutes of Health John E. Fogarty International Center. The questionnaire includes both quantitative and qualitative information on the mental health policy, health services, financing and purchasing.Results: In all countries, the tax-financed system was transformed to public health insurance one, though the countries differ in the implementation. The Czech Republic and Slovakia have multiple health insurance funds; Romania has the national unique social health insurance fund administrated by the National Health Insurance House through its district houses and Bulgaria run one national health insurance fund. The compulsory social health insurance system secures that citizens have access to mental health services. The Czech Republic and Slovakia do not have any separate budget for mental health care; mental health care is financially integrated with other services. In Romania is the Mental Health National Program developed by the Health Ministry through the national unique social health insurance fund. Bulgaria is the only country in which inpatient care for the mentally ill is financed from the state budget and outpatient care is financed from health insurance.","PeriodicalId":403132,"journal":{"name":"HEN: Financing & Budgeting (Topic)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental Health Financing and Purchasing in Four Eastern European Countries\",\"authors\":\"G. Cosoveanu, M. Dlouhý, H. Hinkov, Pavol Čižmárik\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1810080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objectives of this international comparison are: a) to describe and analyze the current status of mental health financing and purchasing in Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Bulgaria; b) to identify common trends as well as national specifics in mental health financing and purchasing and find opportunities for transfer of knowledge and experience among the countries, c) to improve understanding of the attitudes towards mental health services in the countries. Methods: The country-specific information was obtained by a questionnaire that was developed by the research team in the project “Finance and Mental Health Services Training in Czech Republic/Central Europe”, sponsored by the U.S. National Institutes of Health John E. Fogarty International Center. The questionnaire includes both quantitative and qualitative information on the mental health policy, health services, financing and purchasing.Results: In all countries, the tax-financed system was transformed to public health insurance one, though the countries differ in the implementation. The Czech Republic and Slovakia have multiple health insurance funds; Romania has the national unique social health insurance fund administrated by the National Health Insurance House through its district houses and Bulgaria run one national health insurance fund. The compulsory social health insurance system secures that citizens have access to mental health services. The Czech Republic and Slovakia do not have any separate budget for mental health care; mental health care is financially integrated with other services. In Romania is the Mental Health National Program developed by the Health Ministry through the national unique social health insurance fund. Bulgaria is the only country in which inpatient care for the mentally ill is financed from the state budget and outpatient care is financed from health insurance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HEN: Financing & Budgeting (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HEN: Financing & Budgeting (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1810080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HEN: Financing & Budgeting (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1810080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一国际比较的目标是:a)描述和分析罗马尼亚、捷克共和国、斯洛伐克和保加利亚的精神卫生筹资和采购现状;(B)确定精神卫生筹资和采购方面的共同趋势以及各国具体情况,并寻找在各国之间转让知识和经验的机会;(c)增进对各国对精神卫生服务态度的了解。方法:研究小组在美国国立卫生研究院约翰·e·福格蒂国际中心赞助的“捷克共和国/中欧金融和心理健康服务培训”项目中,通过问卷调查获得具体国家信息。调查表包括关于精神卫生政策、卫生服务、筹资和采购的定量和定性信息。结果:各国均实现了税收融资体制向公共医疗保险体制的转变,但在实施上存在差异。捷克共和国和斯洛伐克有多种医疗保险基金;罗马尼亚有国家独特的社会健康保险基金,由国家健康保险公司通过其地区办事处管理,保加利亚有一个国家健康保险基金。强制性社会健康保险制度确保公民获得精神卫生服务。捷克共和国和斯洛伐克没有任何单独的精神保健预算;精神卫生保健在财政上与其他服务相结合。在罗马尼亚,卫生部通过国家独特的社会健康保险基金制定了精神健康国家方案。保加利亚是唯一一个精神病患者住院治疗由国家预算供资,门诊治疗由健康保险供资的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mental Health Financing and Purchasing in Four Eastern European Countries
The objectives of this international comparison are: a) to describe and analyze the current status of mental health financing and purchasing in Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Bulgaria; b) to identify common trends as well as national specifics in mental health financing and purchasing and find opportunities for transfer of knowledge and experience among the countries, c) to improve understanding of the attitudes towards mental health services in the countries. Methods: The country-specific information was obtained by a questionnaire that was developed by the research team in the project “Finance and Mental Health Services Training in Czech Republic/Central Europe”, sponsored by the U.S. National Institutes of Health John E. Fogarty International Center. The questionnaire includes both quantitative and qualitative information on the mental health policy, health services, financing and purchasing.Results: In all countries, the tax-financed system was transformed to public health insurance one, though the countries differ in the implementation. The Czech Republic and Slovakia have multiple health insurance funds; Romania has the national unique social health insurance fund administrated by the National Health Insurance House through its district houses and Bulgaria run one national health insurance fund. The compulsory social health insurance system secures that citizens have access to mental health services. The Czech Republic and Slovakia do not have any separate budget for mental health care; mental health care is financially integrated with other services. In Romania is the Mental Health National Program developed by the Health Ministry through the national unique social health insurance fund. Bulgaria is the only country in which inpatient care for the mentally ill is financed from the state budget and outpatient care is financed from health insurance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信