结论:主题重访

Bayesian Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2019-08-23 DOI:10.1093/oso/9780199672110.003.0013

J. Sprenger, S. Hartmann

{"title":"结论:主题重访","authors":"J. Sprenger, S. Hartmann","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199672110.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this final chapter, we look back on the results of the book and the methods we used. In particular, we enter a discussion whether Bayesian philosophy of science can and should be labeled a proper scientific philosophy due to its combination of formal, conceptual, and empirical methods. Finally, we explore the limitations of the book and we sketch projects for future research (e.g., integrating our results with social epistemology of science and the philosophy of statistical inference).","PeriodicalId":140328,"journal":{"name":"Bayesian Philosophy of Science","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conclusion: The Theme Revisited\",\"authors\":\"J. Sprenger, S. Hartmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780199672110.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this final chapter, we look back on the results of the book and the methods we used. In particular, we enter a discussion whether Bayesian philosophy of science can and should be labeled a proper scientific philosophy due to its combination of formal, conceptual, and empirical methods. Finally, we explore the limitations of the book and we sketch projects for future research (e.g., integrating our results with social epistemology of science and the philosophy of statistical inference).\",\"PeriodicalId\":140328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bayesian Philosophy of Science\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bayesian Philosophy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672110.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bayesian Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672110.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这最后一章中，我们回顾了本书的结果和我们使用的方法。特别是，由于贝叶斯科学哲学结合了形式、概念和经验方法，我们开始讨论贝叶斯科学哲学是否可以而且应该被标记为一种适当的科学哲学。最后，我们探讨了本书的局限性，并概述了未来研究的项目(例如，将我们的结果与科学的社会认识论和统计推理哲学相结合)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Conclusion: The Theme Revisited

In this final chapter, we look back on the results of the book and the methods we used. In particular, we enter a discussion whether Bayesian philosophy of science can and should be labeled a proper scientific philosophy due to its combination of formal, conceptual, and empirical methods. Finally, we explore the limitations of the book and we sketch projects for future research (e.g., integrating our results with social epistemology of science and the philosophy of statistical inference).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Bayesian Philosophy of Science

自引率

0.00%

发文量