{"title":"不同表面涂覆剂对填充型和树脂改性玻璃离聚体水泥释氟/再充电能力的体外研究","authors":"Shaymaa I. Habib","doi":"10.21608/adjc.2020.26342.1063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Evaluate the effect of nano-filled coating on fluoride release/recharging ability of Equia forte Fil and Fuji II LC glass ionomer cements in comparison to commonly used surface coatings; universal adhesive and petroleum jelly. Methodology: 24 disc-shaped samples for each group were prepared with glass hybrid (Group I) and resin- modified glass ionomer cement (Group II). Each group was divided into four subgroups; 1: Control, 2: Equia Forte Coat, 3: Single bond Universal and 4: Petroleum jelly. Fluoride ions released was measured at different time intervals using fluoride-specific ion-electrode. After 63 days, samples were immersed in sodium-fluoride gel and fluoride recharge capability was evaluated. Results: Application of coats on glass hybrid resulted in significant decrease in fluoride ions release at all tested time intervals, in comparison to control group (p<0.0001). The least ions release was recorded in nano-filled coat and universal adhesive. For RMGIC, delay in burst release was observed after coating, with the least fluoride release recorded in nano-filled coated subgroup. All groups showed the ability to recharge with NaF gel and re-release again. Conclusions: 1. Application of coatings has dramatic reducing effect on fluoride ions release/recharging ability. 2. Nano-filled coating and universal adhesive have a hindering influence on fluoride ions release more than petroleum jelly. 3. The effect of nano-filled coating is more evident on glass hybrid than on resin- modified glass ionomer cement. 4. Application of coatings on glass hybrid and RMGIC delayed the burst release but maintained the fluoride release ability of GICs at constant level.","PeriodicalId":140501,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Dental Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluoride Releasing/Recharging Ability of Bulk-Fill and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements After the Application of Different Surface Coating Agents: An In -Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"Shaymaa I. Habib\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/adjc.2020.26342.1063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Evaluate the effect of nano-filled coating on fluoride release/recharging ability of Equia forte Fil and Fuji II LC glass ionomer cements in comparison to commonly used surface coatings; universal adhesive and petroleum jelly. Methodology: 24 disc-shaped samples for each group were prepared with glass hybrid (Group I) and resin- modified glass ionomer cement (Group II). Each group was divided into four subgroups; 1: Control, 2: Equia Forte Coat, 3: Single bond Universal and 4: Petroleum jelly. Fluoride ions released was measured at different time intervals using fluoride-specific ion-electrode. After 63 days, samples were immersed in sodium-fluoride gel and fluoride recharge capability was evaluated. Results: Application of coats on glass hybrid resulted in significant decrease in fluoride ions release at all tested time intervals, in comparison to control group (p<0.0001). The least ions release was recorded in nano-filled coat and universal adhesive. For RMGIC, delay in burst release was observed after coating, with the least fluoride release recorded in nano-filled coated subgroup. All groups showed the ability to recharge with NaF gel and re-release again. Conclusions: 1. Application of coatings has dramatic reducing effect on fluoride ions release/recharging ability. 2. Nano-filled coating and universal adhesive have a hindering influence on fluoride ions release more than petroleum jelly. 3. The effect of nano-filled coating is more evident on glass hybrid than on resin- modified glass ionomer cement. 4. Application of coatings on glass hybrid and RMGIC delayed the burst release but maintained the fluoride release ability of GICs at constant level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":140501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjc.2020.26342.1063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjc.2020.26342.1063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
目的:评价纳米填充涂层对Equia forte Fil和Fuji II LC玻璃离子水门合剂释放/充电能力的影响,并与常用表面涂层进行比较;万能胶和凡士林。方法:用玻璃杂化物(I组)和树脂改性玻璃离子水门合剂(II组)制备每组24个盘状样品。每组又分为4个亚组;1:控制,2:Equia Forte涂层,3:单键通用和4:凡士林。采用氟化物专用离子电极测定不同时间间隔的氟离子释放量。63 d后,将样品浸泡在氟化钠凝胶中,评估氟离子补给能力。结果:与对照组相比,在玻璃杂交种上涂覆涂层在所有测试时间间隔内均显著减少氟离子释放(p<0.0001)。纳米填充涂层和万能胶粘剂的离子释放量最小。对于RMGIC,包覆后爆发释放延迟,纳米填充包覆亚组氟化物释放最少。所有组均表现出NaF凝胶充能和再释放的能力。结论:1。涂层的应用对氟离子的释放/再充电能力有显著的降低作用。2. 纳米填充涂层和万能胶对氟离子释放的阻碍作用大于凡士林。3.纳米填充涂层对玻璃杂化物的影响比对树脂改性玻璃离子水泥的影响更明显。4. 在玻璃杂化物和RMGIC表面涂覆涂层可以延缓其爆发释放,但使gic的氟释放能力保持在恒定水平。
Fluoride Releasing/Recharging Ability of Bulk-Fill and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements After the Application of Different Surface Coating Agents: An In -Vitro Study
Objective: Evaluate the effect of nano-filled coating on fluoride release/recharging ability of Equia forte Fil and Fuji II LC glass ionomer cements in comparison to commonly used surface coatings; universal adhesive and petroleum jelly. Methodology: 24 disc-shaped samples for each group were prepared with glass hybrid (Group I) and resin- modified glass ionomer cement (Group II). Each group was divided into four subgroups; 1: Control, 2: Equia Forte Coat, 3: Single bond Universal and 4: Petroleum jelly. Fluoride ions released was measured at different time intervals using fluoride-specific ion-electrode. After 63 days, samples were immersed in sodium-fluoride gel and fluoride recharge capability was evaluated. Results: Application of coats on glass hybrid resulted in significant decrease in fluoride ions release at all tested time intervals, in comparison to control group (p<0.0001). The least ions release was recorded in nano-filled coat and universal adhesive. For RMGIC, delay in burst release was observed after coating, with the least fluoride release recorded in nano-filled coated subgroup. All groups showed the ability to recharge with NaF gel and re-release again. Conclusions: 1. Application of coatings has dramatic reducing effect on fluoride ions release/recharging ability. 2. Nano-filled coating and universal adhesive have a hindering influence on fluoride ions release more than petroleum jelly. 3. The effect of nano-filled coating is more evident on glass hybrid than on resin- modified glass ionomer cement. 4. Application of coatings on glass hybrid and RMGIC delayed the burst release but maintained the fluoride release ability of GICs at constant level.