Yue Wang, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Jin-Dong Kim, Rune Saetre, Junichi Tsujii
{"title":"提高异构注释的兼容性:以","authors":"Yue Wang, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Jin-Dong Kim, Rune Saetre, Junichi Tsujii","doi":"10.3115/1572306.1572338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there are several corpora which claim to have annotations for protein references, the heterogeneity between the annotations is recognized as an obstacle to develop expensive resources in a synergistic way. Here we present a series of experimental results which show the differences of protein mention annotations made to two corpora, GENIA and AImed.","PeriodicalId":200974,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Raising the Compatibility of Heterogeneous Annotations: A Case Study on\",\"authors\":\"Yue Wang, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Jin-Dong Kim, Rune Saetre, Junichi Tsujii\",\"doi\":\"10.3115/1572306.1572338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While there are several corpora which claim to have annotations for protein references, the heterogeneity between the annotations is recognized as an obstacle to develop expensive resources in a synergistic way. Here we present a series of experimental results which show the differences of protein mention annotations made to two corpora, GENIA and AImed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3115/1572306.1572338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/1572306.1572338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Raising the Compatibility of Heterogeneous Annotations: A Case Study on
While there are several corpora which claim to have annotations for protein references, the heterogeneity between the annotations is recognized as an obstacle to develop expensive resources in a synergistic way. Here we present a series of experimental results which show the differences of protein mention annotations made to two corpora, GENIA and AImed.