基于语音密码的说话人验证特征归一化技术的比较评价

Fidalizia Pyrtuh, Sarfaraz Jelil, Geetima Kachari, L. J. Singh
{"title":"基于语音密码的说话人验证特征归一化技术的比较评价","authors":"Fidalizia Pyrtuh, Sarfaraz Jelil, Geetima Kachari, L. J. Singh","doi":"10.1109/NCVPRIPG.2013.6776237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative study of the normalization techniques used at feature level in voice password based speaker verification system. The input sample speech is recorded at different instants of time and environment. Hence, there is a variation in the input sample due to the environmental interference, noise, emotions etc. The input sample is a human voice with unique passwords taken/recorded at three different instants of time or day. This input sample is processed using sampling, pre-emphasis, MFCC feature extraction and DTW. In order to enhance the features we have used three different popular feature normalization techniques namely MVN (Mean and Variance Normalization), CMN (Cepstral Mean Normalization) and PCA(Principal Component Analysis) and analyzed the result of each technique individually. The objective of this paper is to compare the performance and efficiency of these techniques and evaluate which of these gives the best verification rate. According to our findings CMN gives the best results.","PeriodicalId":436402,"journal":{"name":"2013 Fourth National Conference on Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition, Image Processing and Graphics (NCVPRIPG)","volume":"78 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of feature normalization techniques for voice password based speaker verification\",\"authors\":\"Fidalizia Pyrtuh, Sarfaraz Jelil, Geetima Kachari, L. J. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NCVPRIPG.2013.6776237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparative study of the normalization techniques used at feature level in voice password based speaker verification system. The input sample speech is recorded at different instants of time and environment. Hence, there is a variation in the input sample due to the environmental interference, noise, emotions etc. The input sample is a human voice with unique passwords taken/recorded at three different instants of time or day. This input sample is processed using sampling, pre-emphasis, MFCC feature extraction and DTW. In order to enhance the features we have used three different popular feature normalization techniques namely MVN (Mean and Variance Normalization), CMN (Cepstral Mean Normalization) and PCA(Principal Component Analysis) and analyzed the result of each technique individually. The objective of this paper is to compare the performance and efficiency of these techniques and evaluate which of these gives the best verification rate. According to our findings CMN gives the best results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Fourth National Conference on Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition, Image Processing and Graphics (NCVPRIPG)\",\"volume\":\"78 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Fourth National Conference on Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition, Image Processing and Graphics (NCVPRIPG)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NCVPRIPG.2013.6776237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Fourth National Conference on Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition, Image Processing and Graphics (NCVPRIPG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NCVPRIPG.2013.6776237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文对基于语音密码的说话人验证系统中特征级的归一化技术进行了比较研究。在不同的时间和环境下记录输入的语音样本。因此,由于环境干扰、噪声、情绪等,输入样本存在变化。输入样本是在三个不同的时间或一天中拍摄/记录的具有唯一密码的人类声音。该输入样本使用采样、预强调、MFCC特征提取和DTW进行处理。为了增强特征,我们使用了三种不同的流行特征归一化技术,即MVN(均值和方差归一化),CMN(倒谱均值归一化)和PCA(主成分分析),并分别分析了每种技术的结果。本文的目的是比较这些技术的性能和效率,并评估哪一种技术给出了最好的验证率。根据我们的研究结果,CMN给出了最好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of feature normalization techniques for voice password based speaker verification
This paper presents a comparative study of the normalization techniques used at feature level in voice password based speaker verification system. The input sample speech is recorded at different instants of time and environment. Hence, there is a variation in the input sample due to the environmental interference, noise, emotions etc. The input sample is a human voice with unique passwords taken/recorded at three different instants of time or day. This input sample is processed using sampling, pre-emphasis, MFCC feature extraction and DTW. In order to enhance the features we have used three different popular feature normalization techniques namely MVN (Mean and Variance Normalization), CMN (Cepstral Mean Normalization) and PCA(Principal Component Analysis) and analyzed the result of each technique individually. The objective of this paper is to compare the performance and efficiency of these techniques and evaluate which of these gives the best verification rate. According to our findings CMN gives the best results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信