分词一致和词缀省略

Vicenç Torrens
{"title":"分词一致和词缀省略","authors":"Vicenç Torrens","doi":"10.36505/exling-2011/04/0034/000203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Object clitic omission has been considered to be a general feature of child grammar. In this paper we show that while omission is high in young Catalan speaking children, it is very low in Spanish-speaking children. This difference can be attributed to the availability of participle agreement when objects cliticise. I present a research where we test, through a grammaticality judgement task, the sensitivity of Catalan and Spanish children to participle agreement and find a statistically significant difference between the two languages.","PeriodicalId":447857,"journal":{"name":"ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participle agreement and clitic omission\",\"authors\":\"Vicenç Torrens\",\"doi\":\"10.36505/exling-2011/04/0034/000203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Object clitic omission has been considered to be a general feature of child grammar. In this paper we show that while omission is high in young Catalan speaking children, it is very low in Spanish-speaking children. This difference can be attributed to the availability of participle agreement when objects cliticise. I present a research where we test, through a grammaticality judgement task, the sensitivity of Catalan and Spanish children to participle agreement and find a statistically significant difference between the two languages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"158 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36505/exling-2011/04/0034/000203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36505/exling-2011/04/0034/000203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宾语从句省略一直被认为是儿童语法的一个普遍特征。在这篇论文中,我们表明,虽然说加泰罗尼亚语的儿童的遗漏率很高,但说西班牙语的儿童的遗漏率很低。这种差异可以归因于当对象被修饰时分词一致性的可用性。我提出了一项研究,通过语法判断任务,我们测试了加泰罗尼亚语和西班牙语儿童对分词一致性的敏感性,并发现两种语言之间存在统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Participle agreement and clitic omission
Object clitic omission has been considered to be a general feature of child grammar. In this paper we show that while omission is high in young Catalan speaking children, it is very low in Spanish-speaking children. This difference can be attributed to the availability of participle agreement when objects cliticise. I present a research where we test, through a grammaticality judgement task, the sensitivity of Catalan and Spanish children to participle agreement and find a statistically significant difference between the two languages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信