通过盒块试验和imu对脑卒中幸存者上肢损伤的运动学评价

Luca Mattioli, Ilaria Mileti, D. Mattia, F. Cincotti, Ilaria Conforti, V. D. Seta, Z. Prete, E. Palermo, E. Colamarino, F. Pichiorri, J. Toppi
{"title":"通过盒块试验和imu对脑卒中幸存者上肢损伤的运动学评价","authors":"Luca Mattioli, Ilaria Mileti, D. Mattia, F. Cincotti, Ilaria Conforti, V. D. Seta, Z. Prete, E. Palermo, E. Colamarino, F. Pichiorri, J. Toppi","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA57477.2023.10171923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motion analysis is a fundamental methodology for examining upper-limb function. The objective of this study is to find a kinematic index for objectively evaluating the motor impairment caused by a stroke, during the execution of the Box and Block Test (BBT). We tracked trunk and upper limb motion during the test, using seven inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors placed on trunk and upper limb of both sides. Two groups of subjects were considered. 14 healthy subjects, with a mean age of 47.9 ±18.3.10 stroke survivors, with a mean age of 53.6 ±19.8 and with different levels of motor disability (with an average value of 54.4 ±6.4 calculated with the Fugl-Meyer scale). Data acquired were processed through validated biomechanical models, dividing BBT task into three subphases: Reaching, Tranfser and Coming Back. Average hand velocity was calculated and compared among the dominant side of healthy subjects, the affected side, and the unaffected side of patients. The ANOVA test was used to study the differences between the two groups. As expected, the mean hand velocity of the affected side of the patients was found to be lower than both the dominant side of the control group and the unaffected side of patients (p<0.05). A correlation study was also conducted between mean velocity and the score that patients achieved in the BBT. For this study, however, the significance was not reached (p>0.1).","PeriodicalId":191927,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinematic evaluation of upper limb impairment in stroke survivors through box and block test and IMUs\",\"authors\":\"Luca Mattioli, Ilaria Mileti, D. Mattia, F. Cincotti, Ilaria Conforti, V. D. Seta, Z. Prete, E. Palermo, E. Colamarino, F. Pichiorri, J. Toppi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MeMeA57477.2023.10171923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Motion analysis is a fundamental methodology for examining upper-limb function. The objective of this study is to find a kinematic index for objectively evaluating the motor impairment caused by a stroke, during the execution of the Box and Block Test (BBT). We tracked trunk and upper limb motion during the test, using seven inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors placed on trunk and upper limb of both sides. Two groups of subjects were considered. 14 healthy subjects, with a mean age of 47.9 ±18.3.10 stroke survivors, with a mean age of 53.6 ±19.8 and with different levels of motor disability (with an average value of 54.4 ±6.4 calculated with the Fugl-Meyer scale). Data acquired were processed through validated biomechanical models, dividing BBT task into three subphases: Reaching, Tranfser and Coming Back. Average hand velocity was calculated and compared among the dominant side of healthy subjects, the affected side, and the unaffected side of patients. The ANOVA test was used to study the differences between the two groups. As expected, the mean hand velocity of the affected side of the patients was found to be lower than both the dominant side of the control group and the unaffected side of patients (p<0.05). A correlation study was also conducted between mean velocity and the score that patients achieved in the BBT. For this study, however, the significance was not reached (p>0.1).\",\"PeriodicalId\":191927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA57477.2023.10171923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA57477.2023.10171923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动分析是检查上肢功能的基本方法。本研究的目的是在进行盒块测试(BBT)时,寻找一种客观评估中风引起的运动损伤的运动学指标。在测试过程中,我们使用放置在躯干和两侧上肢的七个惯性测量单元(IMU)传感器跟踪躯干和上肢的运动。研究对象分为两组。健康受试者14例,平均年龄为47.9±18.3.10岁,平均年龄为53.6±19.8岁,具有不同程度的运动障碍(Fugl-Meyer量表计算平均值为54.4±6.4)。通过验证的生物力学模型处理获得的数据,将BBT任务分为三个子阶段:到达,转移和回来。计算并比较健康受试者的优势侧、患侧和未患侧的平均手速度。采用方差分析(ANOVA)检验两组间的差异。正如预期的那样,发现患者患侧的平均手速度低于对照组的优势侧和未受影响的患者(p0.1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kinematic evaluation of upper limb impairment in stroke survivors through box and block test and IMUs
Motion analysis is a fundamental methodology for examining upper-limb function. The objective of this study is to find a kinematic index for objectively evaluating the motor impairment caused by a stroke, during the execution of the Box and Block Test (BBT). We tracked trunk and upper limb motion during the test, using seven inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors placed on trunk and upper limb of both sides. Two groups of subjects were considered. 14 healthy subjects, with a mean age of 47.9 ±18.3.10 stroke survivors, with a mean age of 53.6 ±19.8 and with different levels of motor disability (with an average value of 54.4 ±6.4 calculated with the Fugl-Meyer scale). Data acquired were processed through validated biomechanical models, dividing BBT task into three subphases: Reaching, Tranfser and Coming Back. Average hand velocity was calculated and compared among the dominant side of healthy subjects, the affected side, and the unaffected side of patients. The ANOVA test was used to study the differences between the two groups. As expected, the mean hand velocity of the affected side of the patients was found to be lower than both the dominant side of the control group and the unaffected side of patients (p<0.05). A correlation study was also conducted between mean velocity and the score that patients achieved in the BBT. For this study, however, the significance was not reached (p>0.1).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信